Literature DB >> 19928752

Chemical domain of QSAR models from atom-centered fragments.

Ralph Kühne1, Ralf-Uwe Ebert, Gerrit Schüürmann.   

Abstract

A methodology to characterize the chemical domain of qualitative and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models based on the atom-centered fragment (ACF) approach is introduced. ACFs decompose the molecule into structural pieces, with each non-hydrogen atom of the molecule acting as an ACF center. ACFs vary with respect to their size in terms of the path length covered in each bonding direction starting from a given central atom and how comprehensively the neighbor atoms (including hydrogen) are described in terms of element type and bonding environment. In addition to these different levels of ACF definitions, the ACF match mode as degree of strictness of the ACF comparison between a test compound and a given ACF pool (such as from a training set) has to be specified. Analyses of the prediction statistics of three QSAR models with their training sets as well as with external test sets and associated subsets demonstrate a clear relationship between the prediction performance and the levels of ACF definition and match mode. The findings suggest that second-order ACFs combined with a borderline match mode may serve as a generic and at the same time a mechanistically sound tool to define and evaluate the chemical domain of QSAR models. Moreover, four standard categories of the ACF-based membership to a given chemical domain (outside, borderline outside, borderline inside, inside) are introduced that provide more specific information about the expected QSAR prediction performance. As such, the ACF-based characterization of the chemical domain appears to be particularly useful for QSAR applications in the context of REACH and other regulatory schemes addressing the safety evaluation of chemical compounds.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19928752     DOI: 10.1021/ci900313u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  9 in total

1.  ChemStable: a web server for rule-embedded naïve Bayesian learning approach to predict compound stability.

Authors:  Zhihong Liu; Minghao Zheng; Xin Yan; Qiong Gu; Johann Gasteiger; Johan Tijhuis; Peter Maas; Jiabo Li; Jun Xu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  LBVS: an online platform for ligand-based virtual screening using publicly accessible databases.

Authors:  Minghao Zheng; Zhihong Liu; Xin Yan; Qianzhi Ding; Qiong Gu; Jun Xu
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Computational prediction of potential inhibitors for SARS-COV-2 main protease based on machine learning, docking, MM-PBSA calculations, and metadynamics.

Authors:  Isabela de Souza Gomes; Charles Abreu Santana; Leandro Soriano Marcolino; Leonardo Henrique França de Lima; Raquel Cardoso de Melo-Minardi; Roberto Sousa Dias; Sérgio Oliveira de Paula; Sabrina de Azevedo Silveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  QSAR with experimental and predictive distributions: an information theoretic approach for assessing model quality.

Authors:  David J Wood; Lars Carlsson; Martin Eklund; Ulf Norinder; Jonna Stålring
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Development of an ecotoxicity QSAR model for the KAshinhou Tool for Ecotoxicity (KATE) system, March 2009 version.

Authors:  A Furuhama; T Toida; N Nishikawa; Y Aoki; Y Yoshioka; H Shiraishi
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Screening for potential endocrine disruptors in fish: evidence from structural alerts and in vitro and in vivo toxicological assays.

Authors:  Monika Nendza; Andrea Wenzel; Martin Müller; Geertje Lewin; Nelly Simetska; Frauke Stock; Jürgen Arning
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.893

7.  Species sensitivity distributions for use in environmental protection, assessment, and management of aquatic ecosystems for 12 386 chemicals.

Authors:  Leo Posthuma; Jos van Gils; Michiel C Zijp; Dik van de Meent; Dick de Zwart
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Prioritization of Mycotoxins Based on Their Genotoxic Potential with an In Silico-In Vitro Strategy.

Authors:  Maria Alonso-Jauregui; María Font; Elena González-Peñas; Adela López de Cerain; Ariane Vettorazzi
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  ERGO: Breaking Down the Wall between Human Health and Environmental Testing of Endocrine Disrupters.

Authors:  Henrik Holbech; Peter Matthiessen; Martin Hansen; Gerrit Schüürmann; Dries Knapen; Marieke Reuver; Frédéric Flamant; Laurent Sachs; Werner Kloas; Klara Hilscherova; Marc Leonard; Jürgen Arning; Volker Strauss; Taisen Iguchi; Lisa Baumann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.