Carol L Mackersie1, Yingyong Qi, Arthur Boothroyd, Nicole Conrad. 1. San Diego State University, School of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, 5500 Campanile Dr., MC-1518, San Diego, CA 92182-1518, USA. cmackers@mail.sdsu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare multichannel amplification within a cellular phone system to a standard cellular phone response. RESEARCH DESIGN: Three cellular phone speech-encoding strategies were evaluated: a narrow-band (3.5 kHz upper cutoff) enhanced variable-rate coder (EVRC), a narrow-band selectable mode vocoder (SMV), and a wide-band SMV (7.5 kHz cutoff). Because the SMV encoding strategies are not yet available on phones, the processing was simulated using a computer. Individualized-amplification settings were created using NAL-NL1 (National Acoustic Laboratories--Non-linear 1) targets. Overall gain was set at preferred listening levels for both the individualized-amplification setting and the standard cellular phone setting for each of the three encoders. Phoneme-recognition scores and subjective ratings (listening effort, overall quality) were obtained in quiet and in noise. Stimuli were played from loudspeakers in one room, picked up by a microphone connected to a (transmitting) computer, and sent over the Internet to a receiving computer in an adjacent room, where the signal was amplified and delivered monaurally. STUDY SAMPLE: Fourteen participants with hearing loss. RESULTS: Phoneme scores and subjective ratings were significantly higher for the individualized-amplification setting than for the standard setting in both quiet and noise. There were no significant differences among the cellular phone encoding strategies for any measure.
PURPOSE: To compare multichannel amplification within a cellular phone system to a standard cellular phone response. RESEARCH DESIGN: Three cellular phone speech-encoding strategies were evaluated: a narrow-band (3.5 kHz upper cutoff) enhanced variable-rate coder (EVRC), a narrow-band selectable mode vocoder (SMV), and a wide-band SMV (7.5 kHz cutoff). Because the SMV encoding strategies are not yet available on phones, the processing was simulated using a computer. Individualized-amplification settings were created using NAL-NL1 (National Acoustic Laboratories--Non-linear 1) targets. Overall gain was set at preferred listening levels for both the individualized-amplification setting and the standard cellular phone setting for each of the three encoders. Phoneme-recognition scores and subjective ratings (listening effort, overall quality) were obtained in quiet and in noise. Stimuli were played from loudspeakers in one room, picked up by a microphone connected to a (transmitting) computer, and sent over the Internet to a receiving computer in an adjacent room, where the signal was amplified and delivered monaurally. STUDY SAMPLE: Fourteen participants with hearing loss. RESULTS: Phoneme scores and subjective ratings were significantly higher for the individualized-amplification setting than for the standard setting in both quiet and noise. There were no significant differences among the cellular phone encoding strategies for any measure.