Literature DB >> 19927672

Subjective and objective evaluation of noise management algorithms.

Heidi Peeters1, Francis Kuk, Chi-chuen Lau, Denise Keenan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the subjective and objective improvement of speech intelligibility in noise offered by a commercial hearing aid that uses a fully adaptive directional microphone and a noise reduction algorithm that optimizes the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII). RESEARCH
DESIGN: Comparison of results on the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) and the Acceptable Noise Level task (ANL). STUDY SAMPLE: Eighteen participants with varying configurations of sensorineural hearing loss.
RESULTS: Both the directional microphone and the noise reduction algorithm improved the speech-in-noise performance of the participants. The benefits reported were higher for the directional microphone than the noise reduction algorithm. A moderate correlation was noted between the benefits measured on the HINT and the ANL for the directional microphone condition, the noise reduction condition, and the directional microphone plus noise reduction conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the directional microphone and the SII-based noise reduction algorithm may improve the SNR of the listening environments, and both the HINT and the ANL may be used to study their benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19927672     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.20.2.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  7 in total

Review 1.  An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Rebecca A Venediktov; Jaumeiko J Coleman; Hillary M Leech
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Christoph Völker; Anna Warzybok; Stephan M A Ernst
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength Among Hearing Aid Users.

Authors:  Tobias Neher; Kirsten C Wagener
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Efficacy of a Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Function.

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Yuan Chen; Qianran Wang; Volker Kuehnel
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  The Acceptable Noise Level Benefit From Directionality for Listeners With Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Mina Aghsoleimani; Hamid Jalilvand; Mohammad Ebrahim Mahdavi; Ahmad Reza Nazeri; Mohammad Kamali
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.372

6.  Type of Speech Material Affects Acceptable Noise Level Test Outcome.

Authors:  Xaver Koch; Gertjan Dingemanse; André Goedegebure; Esther Janse
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-26

7.  The Effects of Hearing Aid Digital Noise Reduction and Directionality on Acceptable Noise Level.

Authors:  Roghayeh Ahmadi; Hamid Jalilvand; Mohammad Ebrahim Mahdavi; Fatemeh Ahmadi; Ali Reza Akbarzade Baghban
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 3.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.