BACKGROUND: Hypertension and dyslipidemia are highly prevalent in the elderly. We studied the combined impact of both conditions on cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. METHODS: We studied 4,311 participants aged 65-98 (61.2% female) from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a longitudinal epidemiologic study, with no prior CVD. We evaluated the relation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or non-HDL-cholesterol combined with blood pressure (BP) categories to incident CVD-including coronary heart disease (CHD) (angina, myocardial infarction (MI), angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, or CHD death), stroke, claudication, and CVD death over 15 years. RESULTS: CVD incidence (per 1,000 person years) ranged from 38.4 when BP <120/80 mm Hg and LDL-C <100 mg/dl to 94.8 when BP >or=160/100 mm Hg and LDL-C >or=160 mg/dl, and from 28.9 when BP <120/80 mm Hg and HDL >60 mg/dl to 87.1 for a BP >or=160/100 and HDL-C <40 mg/dl. Compared with those with BP <120/80 mm Hg with either LDL-C <100 mg/dl or HDL-C >60 mg/dl, hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD events were 2.1 when BP >or=160/100 mm Hg and LDL-C >or=160 mg/dl and 2.1 when BP >or=160/100 and HDL-C <40 mg/dl (all P < 0.01), with similar results for non-HDL-C. Elevated BP was associated with increased risk across all lipid levels. Increased LDL-C added risk mainly when BP <140/90 mm Hg, but lower HDL-C also predicted CVD in those with higher BP. CONCLUSION: Increased BP confers increased risks for CVD in elderly persons across all lipid levels. Although increased LDL-C added risk mainly when BP <140/90 mm Hg, low HDL-C added risk also in those with hypertension. These results document the importance of combined hypertension and dyslipidemia.
BACKGROUND:Hypertension and dyslipidemia are highly prevalent in the elderly. We studied the combined impact of both conditions on cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. METHODS: We studied 4,311 participants aged 65-98 (61.2% female) from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a longitudinal epidemiologic study, with no prior CVD. We evaluated the relation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or non-HDL-cholesterol combined with blood pressure (BP) categories to incident CVD-including coronary heart disease (CHD) (angina, myocardial infarction (MI), angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, or CHD death), stroke, claudication, and CVD death over 15 years. RESULTS: CVD incidence (per 1,000 person years) ranged from 38.4 when BP <120/80 mm Hg and LDL-C <100 mg/dl to 94.8 when BP >or=160/100 mm Hg and LDL-C >or=160 mg/dl, and from 28.9 when BP <120/80 mm Hg and HDL >60 mg/dl to 87.1 for a BP >or=160/100 and HDL-C <40 mg/dl. Compared with those with BP <120/80 mm Hg with either LDL-C <100 mg/dl or HDL-C >60 mg/dl, hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD events were 2.1 when BP >or=160/100 mm Hg and LDL-C >or=160 mg/dl and 2.1 when BP >or=160/100 and HDL-C <40 mg/dl (all P < 0.01), with similar results for non-HDL-C. Elevated BP was associated with increased risk across all lipid levels. Increased LDL-C added risk mainly when BP <140/90 mm Hg, but lower HDL-C also predicted CVD in those with higher BP. CONCLUSION: Increased BP confers increased risks for CVD in elderly persons across all lipid levels. Although increased LDL-C added risk mainly when BP <140/90 mm Hg, low HDL-C added risk also in those with hypertension. These results document the importance of combined hypertension and dyslipidemia.
Authors: L P Fried; N O Borhani; P Enright; C D Furberg; J M Gardin; R A Kronmal; L H Kuller; T A Manolio; M B Mittelmark; A Newman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 1991-02 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Peter S Sever; Björn Dahlöf; Neil R Poulter; Hans Wedel; Gareth Beevers; Mark Caulfield; Rory Collins; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Arni Kristinsson; Gordon T McInnes; Jesper Mehlsen; Markku Nieminen; Eoin O'Brien; Jan Ostergren Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-04-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bruce M Psaty; Melissa Anderson; Richard A Kronmal; Russell P Tracy; Trevor Orchard; Linda P Fried; Thomas Lumley; John Robbins; Greg Burke; Anne B Newman; Curt D Furberg Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sarah Lewington; Gary Whitlock; Robert Clarke; Paul Sherliker; Jonathan Emberson; Jim Halsey; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-12-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: W H Ettinger; P W Wahl; L H Kuller; T L Bush; R P Tracy; T A Manolio; N O Borhani; N D Wong; D H O'Leary Journal: Circulation Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Weiquan Lu; Helaine E Resnick; Kathleen A Jablonski; Kristina L Jones; Arvind K Jain; Wm James Howard; David C Robbins; Barbara V Howard Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: George Howard; Mary Cushman; Brett M Kissela; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Leslie A McClure; Monika M Safford; J David Rhodes; Elsayed Z Soliman; Claudia S Moy; Suzanne E Judd; Virginia J Howard Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Christina M Vitto; Joseph D Lykins V; Hillary Wiles-Lafayette; Taruna K Aurora Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 4.592