Literature DB >> 19927089

The reliability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging grading of lumbar facet arthropathy in total disc replacement patients.

Jonathan Stieber1, Martin Quirno, Mary Cunningham, Thomas J Errico, John A Bendo.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective inter-rater and intrarater reliability analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the inter-rater and intrarater reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for grading of facet arthropathy as well as determining whether there is a contraindication to total disc replacement (TDR). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several classifications attempted to evaluate lumbar facet joints and their degree of arthropathy. The Fujiwara-MRI and Pathrea-CT classifications remain the most commonly used.
METHODS: A total of 10 fellowship-trained orthopedic spine surgeons and 3 orthopedic spine fellows evaluated 50 levels from L3-L4 through L5-S1 on parallel axial MRI (T1 and T2) and CT images. The degree of osteoarthritis was graded on a 4-point scale (Fujiwara-MRI and Pathrea-CT). Surgeons evaluated whether the degree of facet disease represented a contraindication to TDR. Grading was performed during 2 sessions. Weighted kappa statistics were used to describe inter- and intraobserver agreement.
RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability for MRI was 0.21 and 0.07 (fair to slight) among attendings and fellows, respectively. inter-rater reliability for CT was 0.33 and 0.27 (fair), respectively. The mean intrarater reliability for MRI was fair, 0.36 (attendings) and 0.26 (fellows). The mean intrarater reliability for CT was moderate, 0.52 (attendings) and 0.51 (fellows). For possible TDR contraindication, the inter-rater reliability for MRI was 0.22 and 0.01 (fair to slight) among attendings and fellows, respectively. Inter-rater reliability for CT was 0.33 and 0.45 (fair), respectively. The mean intrarater reliability for MRI was fair, 0.36 (attendings) and 0.26 (fellows). The mean intrarater reliability for CT was moderate, 0.52 (attendings) and 0.51 (fellows).
CONCLUSION: The current grading system for facet arthropathy has only fair agreement. CT is slightly more reliable for grading. Intrarater reliability was only fair for MRI and moderate for CT. Only limited agreement existed between surgeons as to the extent of facet disease that would pose as a contraindication for TDR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19927089     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bda50a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Reliability of change in lumbar MRI findings over time in patients with and without disc prosthesis--comparing two different image evaluation methods.

Authors:  Linda Berg; Oivind Gjertsen; Christian Hellum; Gesche Neckelmann; Lars G Johnsen; Geir E Eide; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  The lumbar facet joint: a review of current knowledge: Part II: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Gerard P Varlotta; Todd R Lefkowitz; Mark Schweitzer; Thomas J Errico; Jeffrey Spivak; John A Bendo; Leon Rybak
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Quantitative in vivo MRI evaluation of lumbar facet joints and intervertebral discs using axial T2 mapping.

Authors:  David Stelzeneder; Alina Messner; Marianna Vlychou; Goetz H Welsch; Georg Scheurecker; Sabine Goed; Karin Pieber; Verena Pflueger; Klaus M Friedrich; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Facet arthropathy evaluation: CT or MRI?

Authors:  Linda Berg; Hanne Thoresen; Gesche Neckelmann; Håvard Furunes; Christian Hellum; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Real-time fusion-imaging in low back pain: a new navigation system for facet joint injections.

Authors:  Elena Massone; Davide Orlandi; Alberto Bellelli; Fabio Martino; Luca Cavagnaro; Matteo Formica; Pietro Caruso; Enzo Silvestri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting.

Authors:  Gustav Andreisek; Richard A Deyo; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Francois Porchet; Sebastian F X Winklhofer; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Training improves interobserver reliability for the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement.

Authors:  Geert A Buijze; Thierry G Guitton; C Niek van Dijk; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Radiographic loss of contact between radial head fracture fragments is moderately reliable.

Authors:  Wendy E Bruinsma; Thierry Guitton; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Linda Berg; Gesche Neckelmann; Oivind Gjertsen; Christian Hellum; Lars G Johnsen; Geir E Eide; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Bone scans are reliable for the identification of lumbar disk and facet pathology.

Authors:  Gregory M Malham; Rhiannon M Parker; Zita E Ballok; Ben Goss; Ashish D Diwan; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.