OBJECTIVE: Little is known about patient satisfaction and disability after brachial plexus surgery. Would patients undergo the procedure again, if they knew the current result beforehand? How do they rate their result and their disability? METHODS: Of 319 plexus patients who had undergone surgery between 1995 and 2005, 199 received a 65-item questionnaire. Measurement instruments included a new plexus-specific outcome questionnaire (Ulm Questionnaire) with categories of satisfaction, functionality, pain, comorbidities, and work; and the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH; scale, 0-100). RESULTS: Of 99 returned questionnaires, 70 were returned in a useful form for evaluation. The results of patients with C5-C6 lesions (21 of 70) are as follows: 90% (19 of 21) would undergo surgery again, 95% (20 of 21) were satisfied with the result, and 86% (18 of 21) subjectively improved. The mean DASH score was 41 (standard deviation [SD], 24). The results of patients with C5-C7 lesions (6 of 70) are as follows: 50% (3 of 6) were satisfied and would undergo surgery again, and 67% (4 of 6) improved. The mean DASH score was 46 (SD, 13). The results of patients with C5-T1 lesions (43 of 70) are as follows: 67% (29 of 43) would undergo surgery again, 81% (35 of 42) were satisfied, and 74% (32 of 43) reported improvement. The mean DASH score was 58 (SD, 26). The overall mean DASH score was 52 (SD, 26). Pain since the injury was prevalent in 86% of patients (60 of 70), back pain in 53%, and depression/anxiety in 21%. Fifty-two percent of those who worked before their injury (27 of 53 patients) remained unemployed or incapacitated for work. Forty-five percent of previous workers (24 of 53) returned to their former occupation. Occupational retraining was successful for 70% of patients (16 of 23). The mean duration until return to work was 9 months overall and 5 months for those who returned to their previous occupation. CONCLUSION: Eighty-seven percent of patients were satisfied with the results and 83% would undergo the procedure again. Despite a high satisfaction rate, patients remained considerably disabled, and half of the previous workers did not return to work. Occupational retraining is effective.
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about patient satisfaction and disability after brachial plexus surgery. Would patients undergo the procedure again, if they knew the current result beforehand? How do they rate their result and their disability? METHODS: Of 319 plexus patients who had undergone surgery between 1995 and 2005, 199 received a 65-item questionnaire. Measurement instruments included a new plexus-specific outcome questionnaire (Ulm Questionnaire) with categories of satisfaction, functionality, pain, comorbidities, and work; and the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH; scale, 0-100). RESULTS: Of 99 returned questionnaires, 70 were returned in a useful form for evaluation. The results of patients with C5-C6 lesions (21 of 70) are as follows: 90% (19 of 21) would undergo surgery again, 95% (20 of 21) were satisfied with the result, and 86% (18 of 21) subjectively improved. The mean DASH score was 41 (standard deviation [SD], 24). The results of patients with C5-C7 lesions (6 of 70) are as follows: 50% (3 of 6) were satisfied and would undergo surgery again, and 67% (4 of 6) improved. The mean DASH score was 46 (SD, 13). The results of patients with C5-T1 lesions (43 of 70) are as follows: 67% (29 of 43) would undergo surgery again, 81% (35 of 42) were satisfied, and 74% (32 of 43) reported improvement. The mean DASH score was 58 (SD, 26). The overall mean DASH score was 52 (SD, 26). Pain since the injury was prevalent in 86% of patients (60 of 70), back pain in 53%, and depression/anxiety in 21%. Fifty-two percent of those who worked before their injury (27 of 53 patients) remained unemployed or incapacitated for work. Forty-five percent of previous workers (24 of 53) returned to their former occupation. Occupational retraining was successful for 70% of patients (16 of 23). The mean duration until return to work was 9 months overall and 5 months for those who returned to their previous occupation. CONCLUSION: Eighty-seven percent of patients were satisfied with the results and 83% would undergo the procedure again. Despite a high satisfaction rate, patients remained considerably disabled, and half of the previous workers did not return to work. Occupational retraining is effective.
Authors: Brandon W Smith; Kate W-C Chang; Serena J Saake; Lynda J-S Yang; Kevin C Chung; Susan H Brown Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Sarah M Yannascoli; Dustin Stwalley; Mohammed J Saeed; Margaret A Olsen; Christopher J Dy Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2018-05-19 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Thomas S Hong; Andrea Tian; Ryan Sachar; Wilson Z Ray; David M Brogan; Christopher J Dy Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Christopher J Dy; Rohit Garg; Steve K Lee; Phillip Tow; Carol A Mancuso; Scott W Wolfe Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2014-12-13 Impact factor: 2.230