BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Blood pressure (BP) is a predictor of concurrent and subsequently measured white-matter hyperintensity (WMH), but longitudinal studies of WMH changes and data in black participants are lacking. We hypothesized that WMH progression would be (1) strongly related to BP in blacks and whites and (2) predicted more strongly by earlier (midlife) or cumulative BP measurements than by measures at older ages. METHODS: Participants were 983 individuals (49% black) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study who underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging in 1993-1995 and 2004-2006. Associations between BP (measured at each of 5 visits, in addition to a time-averaged cumulative BP) and progression of WMHs were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Cumulative systolic BP (SBP) was the strongest BP predictor of WMH progression in adjusted models. Higher cumulative SBP (by 20 mm Hg) was associated with greater progression of WMHs and was similar in blacks (2.5 cm(3), P<0.0001) and whites (2.6 cm(3), P<0.0001). Higher cumulative SBP (per 20 mm Hg) was also associated with being in the top quintile of WMH progression (adjusted odds ratio=2.0; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.6). Earlier SBP measurements were stronger predictors of WMH progression than were later SBP measurements, but in blacks only. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort, cumulative SBP was a stronger predictor of WMH progression than SBP from individual visits, in both blacks and whites. Earlier BPs were stronger predictors than BPs measured at later time points in blacks only.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Blood pressure (BP) is a predictor of concurrent and subsequently measured white-matter hyperintensity (WMH), but longitudinal studies of WMH changes and data in black participants are lacking. We hypothesized that WMH progression would be (1) strongly related to BP in blacks and whites and (2) predicted more strongly by earlier (midlife) or cumulative BP measurements than by measures at older ages. METHODS:Participants were 983 individuals (49% black) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study who underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging in 1993-1995 and 2004-2006. Associations between BP (measured at each of 5 visits, in addition to a time-averaged cumulative BP) and progression of WMHs were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Cumulative systolic BP (SBP) was the strongest BP predictor of WMH progression in adjusted models. Higher cumulative SBP (by 20 mm Hg) was associated with greater progression of WMHs and was similar in blacks (2.5 cm(3), P<0.0001) and whites (2.6 cm(3), P<0.0001). Higher cumulative SBP (per 20 mm Hg) was also associated with being in the top quintile of WMH progression (adjusted odds ratio=2.0; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.6). Earlier SBP measurements were stronger predictors of WMH progression than were later SBP measurements, but in blacks only. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort, cumulative SBP was a stronger predictor of WMH progression than SBP from individual visits, in both blacks and whites. Earlier BPs were stronger predictors than BPs measured at later time points in blacks only.
Authors: Robert Stewart; Qian-Li Xue; Kamal Masaki; Helen Petrovitch; G Webster Ross; Lon R White; Lenore J Launer Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-06-29 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: F E de Leeuw; J C de Groot; M Oudkerk; J C Witteman; A Hofman; J van Gijn; M M Breteler Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: W T Longstreth; T A Manolio; A Arnold; G L Burke; N Bryan; C A Jungreis; P L Enright; D O'Leary; L Fried Journal: Stroke Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: T A Manolio; R A Kronmal; G L Burke; V Poirier; D H O'Leary; J M Gardin; L P Fried; E P Steinberg; R N Bryan Journal: Stroke Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Ewoud J van Dijk; Niels D Prins; Henri A Vrooman; Albert Hofman; Peter J Koudstaal; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Tom Jeerakathil; Philip A Wolf; Alexa Beiser; Joseph Massaro; Sudha Seshadri; Ralph B D'Agostino; Charles DeCarli Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-06-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Paul A Nyquist; Murat S Bilgel; Rebecca Gottesman; Lisa R Yanek; Taryn F Moy; Lewis C Becker; Jennifer Cuzzocreo; Jerry Prince; David M Yousem; Diane M Becker; Brian G Kral; Dhananjay Vaidya Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Omar M Al-Janabi; Christopher A Brown; Ahmed A Bahrani; Erin L Abner; Justin M Barber; Brian T Gold; Larry B Goldstein; Ronan R Murphy; Peter T Nelson; Nathan F Johnson; Leslie M Shaw; Charles D Smith; John Q Trojanowski; Donna M Wilcock; Gregory A Jicha Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Natalia S Rost; Saloomeh Sadaghiani; Alessandro Biffi; Kaitlin M Fitzpatrick; Lisa Cloonan; Jonathan Rosand; Dean K Shibata; Thomas H Mosley Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Adam de Havenon; Chelsea Meyer; J Scott McNally; Matthew Alexander; Lee Chung Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2019-07-27 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Charles H Brown; A Richey Sharrett; Josef Coresh; Andrea L C Schneider; Alvaro Alonso; David S Knopman; Thomas H Mosley; Rebecca F Gottesman Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Yi-Fang Chuang; Dana Eldreth; Kirk I Erickson; Vijay Varma; Gregory Harris; Linda P Fried; George W Rebok; Elizabeth K Tanner; Michelle C Carlson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 4.673