O Trabelsi1, A Pérez del Palomar, J L López-Villalobos, A Ginel, M Doblaré. 1. Group of Structural Mechanics and Material Modeling (GEMM), Aragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), Network Centre of Biomedical Research on Bioengineering Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), University of Zaragoza, Maria de Luna s/n, Zaragoza, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cartilage and smooth muscle constitute the main structural components of the human central airways, their mechanical properties affect the flow in the trachea and contribute to the biological function of the respiratory system. The aim of this work is to find out the mechanical passive response of the principal constituents of the human trachea under static tensile conditions and to propose constitutive models to describe their behavior. METHODS: Histological analyses to characterize the tissues and mechanical tests have been made on three human trachea specimens obtained from autopsies. Uniaxial tensile tests on cartilaginous rings and smooth muscle were performed. Tracheal cartilage was considered an elastic material and its Young's modulus and Poisson's coefficient were determined fitting the experimental curves using a Neo-Hookean model. The smooth muscle was proved to behave as a reinforced hyperelastic material with two families of collagen fibers, and its non-linearity was investigated using the Holzapfel strain-energy density function for two families of fibers to fit the experimental data obtained from longitudinal and transversal cuts. RESULTS: For cartilage, fitting the experimental curves to an elastic model, a Young's modulus of 3.33 MPa and nu=0.49 were obtained. For smooth muscle, several parameters of the Holzapfel function were found out (C(10)=0.877 kPa, k(1)=0.154 kPa, k(2)=34.157, k(3)=0.347 kPa and k(4)=13.889) and demonstrated that the tracheal muscle was stiffer in the longitudinal direction. CONCLUSION: The better understanding of how these tissues mechanically behave is essential for a correct modeling of the human trachea, a better simulation of its response under different loading conditions, and the development of strategies for the design of new endotracheal prostheses. (c) 2009 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cartilage and smooth muscle constitute the main structural components of the human central airways, their mechanical properties affect the flow in the trachea and contribute to the biological function of the respiratory system. The aim of this work is to find out the mechanical passive response of the principal constituents of the human trachea under static tensile conditions and to propose constitutive models to describe their behavior. METHODS: Histological analyses to characterize the tissues and mechanical tests have been made on three human trachea specimens obtained from autopsies. Uniaxial tensile tests on cartilaginous rings and smooth muscle were performed. Tracheal cartilage was considered an elastic material and its Young's modulus and Poisson's coefficient were determined fitting the experimental curves using a Neo-Hookean model. The smooth muscle was proved to behave as a reinforced hyperelastic material with two families of collagen fibers, and its non-linearity was investigated using the Holzapfel strain-energy density function for two families of fibers to fit the experimental data obtained from longitudinal and transversal cuts. RESULTS: For cartilage, fitting the experimental curves to an elastic model, a Young's modulus of 3.33 MPa and nu=0.49 were obtained. For smooth muscle, several parameters of the Holzapfel function were found out (C(10)=0.877 kPa, k(1)=0.154 kPa, k(2)=34.157, k(3)=0.347 kPa and k(4)=13.889) and demonstrated that the tracheal muscle was stiffer in the longitudinal direction. CONCLUSION: The better understanding of how these tissues mechanically behave is essential for a correct modeling of the human trachea, a better simulation of its response under different loading conditions, and the development of strategies for the design of new endotracheal prostheses. (c) 2009 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Liping Zhao; Sumati Sundaram; Andrew V Le; Angela H Huang; Jiasheng Zhang; Go Hatachi; Arkadi Beloiartsev; Michael G Caty; Tai Yi; Katherine Leiby; Ashley Gard; Mehmet H Kural; Liqiong Gui; Kevin A Rocco; Amogh Sivarapatna; Elizabeth Calle; Allison Greaney; Luca Urbani; Panagiotis Maghsoudlou; Alan Burns; Paolo DeCoppi; Laura E Niklason Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Jopeth Ramis; Robert Middlewick; Francesco Pappalardo; Jennifer T Cairns; Iain D Stewart; Alison E John; Shams-Un-Nisa Naveed; Ramaswamy Krishnan; Suzanne Miller; Dominick E Shaw; Christopher E Brightling; Lee Buttery; Felicity Rose; Gisli Jenkins; Simon R Johnson; Amanda L Tatler Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 33.795