Monica Parry1, Judy Watt-Watson. 1. Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Canada. monica.parry@utoronto.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heart disease is a major cause of illness, disability and death worldwide with high personal, community and healthcare costs. Social support affects psychological and physical morbidity, mortality, and adjustment to chronic disease. Peer support, a specific type of social support, has been shown to be an effective intervention for a variety of populations. AIM: The aim of this paper is to critically examine the effects of peer support interventions on health outcomes in individuals with heart disease. METHODS: Searches were made of ACP Journal Club, EBM, CDSR, DARE, CCTR (1982-2005), MEDLINE (1966-2005), PsycINFO (1975-July 2005), HealthSTAR (1975-June 2005), and CINAHL (1982-July 2005) using text words and MeSH headings. RESULTS: Electronic and hand searching yielded 27 studies and reviews. Six studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed using guidelines from The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group and The Cochrane Collaboration. Inferences about the results were limited to critical appraisal. The trials demonstrated some positive effects of peer support for individuals with heart disease, including higher levels of self-efficacy, improved activity, reduced pain, and fewer emergency room visits. CONCLUSION: Despite some evidence supporting peer support for individuals with heart disease, methodological problems preclude generalizations. Further research with greater methodological rigor is warranted. Copyright (c) 2009 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Heart disease is a major cause of illness, disability and death worldwide with high personal, community and healthcare costs. Social support affects psychological and physical morbidity, mortality, and adjustment to chronic disease. Peer support, a specific type of social support, has been shown to be an effective intervention for a variety of populations. AIM: The aim of this paper is to critically examine the effects of peer support interventions on health outcomes in individuals with heart disease. METHODS: Searches were made of ACP Journal Club, EBM, CDSR, DARE, CCTR (1982-2005), MEDLINE (1966-2005), PsycINFO (1975-July 2005), HealthSTAR (1975-June 2005), and CINAHL (1982-July 2005) using text words and MeSH headings. RESULTS: Electronic and hand searching yielded 27 studies and reviews. Six studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed using guidelines from The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group and The Cochrane Collaboration. Inferences about the results were limited to critical appraisal. The trials demonstrated some positive effects of peer support for individuals with heart disease, including higher levels of self-efficacy, improved activity, reduced pain, and fewer emergency room visits. CONCLUSION: Despite some evidence supporting peer support for individuals with heart disease, methodological problems preclude generalizations. Further research with greater methodological rigor is warranted. Copyright (c) 2009 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: Marlyn Allicock; Lindsey Haynes-Maslow; La-Shell Johnson; William R Carpenter; Anissa I Vines; Denise G Belle; Ray Phillips; Michele W Cherry Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Katie M Becofsky; Robin P Shook; Xuemei Sui; Sara Wilcox; Carl J Lavie; Steven N Blair Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Katie E Mosack; Leslie Patterson; Amanda M Brouwer; Angela R Wendorf; Kristyn Ertl; Dan Eastwood; Jeffrey Morzinski; Kathlyn Fletcher; Jeff Whittle Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2013-02-12