Literature DB >> 19925789

Ultraviolet radiation transmittance of the mouse eye and its individual media components.

Johanna Tukler Henriksson1, Jan P G Bergmanson, James E Walsh.   

Abstract

Recently, the mouse has become the preferred animal model in ophthalmic research. Therefore, there is a need for enhanced understanding of the mouse eye to validate its use in different experimental setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the ocular transmittance of the whole mouse eye, the cornea and the crystalline lens, particularly in the ultraviolet radiation (UVR) wavebands. This was carried out using a non-cuvette based fiber optic spectrometer system and the resulting transmittance curves were compared with published cone spectral response curves and mouse ocular transmittance data. First, transmittance curves of the whole mouse eye were measured by removing a small disc of sclera from the posterior pole to provide an anterior to posterior optical path. No statistical difference was found between left and right eye in each of the four mice sampled, therefore, all eight eyes were included in the final statistical analysis. The average of five test measurements from each left and right eye for the four test mice showed a transmittance cut off at approximately 310 nm. Secondly, the cornea with a scleral rim was excised and transmittance curves obtained for all eight eyes. This data showed an average transmittance cut off at 280 nm for the cornea. Similarly measured data for the excised crystalline lens showed UVR transmittance down to 310 nm. The good correlation between total ocular UVR transmittance and the sum of the individually measured components (i.e. the cornea and the crystalline lens) supported the validity of our method and its findings. This experiment demonstrated that the mouse cornea transmits more UV-B (280-315 nm) than the rabbit and the human corneal transmittance. The mouse crystalline lens on the other hand showed a cut off in the UV-B at 310 nm, which is at a much lower UV-B wavelength than the approximate UV-A (315-400 nm) cut off for the human crystalline lens at around 390 nm. The increased transmittance of UVR in the mouse eye serves its vision, since the mouse has a cone photopigment peaking at approximately 350 nm. Due to the above stated differences between the mouse and the human it is concluded that the mouse is not an ideal model for the human eye in experiments involving UVR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19925789     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  15 in total

1.  UV-B-induced DNA damage and repair in the mouse lens.

Authors:  Rosana Mesa; Steven Bassnett
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Imaging light responses of retinal ganglion cells in the living mouse eye.

Authors:  Lu Yin; Ying Geng; Fumitaka Osakada; Robin Sharma; Ali H Cetin; Edward M Callaway; David R Williams; William H Merigan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A neuronal circuit for colour vision based on rod-cone opponency.

Authors:  Maximilian Joesch; Markus Meister
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Neuropsin (OPN5)-mediated photoentrainment of local circadian oscillators in mammalian retina and cornea.

Authors:  Ethan D Buhr; Wendy W S Yue; Xiaozhi Ren; Zheng Jiang; Hsi-Wen Rock Liao; Xue Mei; Shruti Vemaraju; Minh-Thanh Nguyen; Randall R Reed; Richard A Lang; King-Wai Yau; Russell N Van Gelder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Improved CoChR Variants Restore Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in a Mouse Model of Blindness under Ambient Light Conditions.

Authors:  Tushar H Ganjawala; Qi Lu; Mitchell D Fenner; Gary W Abrams; Zhuo-Hua Pan
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 11.454

6.  State-dependent pupil dilation rapidly shifts visual feature selectivity.

Authors:  Katrin Franke; Konstantin F Willeke; Kayla Ponder; Mario Galdamez; Na Zhou; Taliah Muhammad; Saumil Patel; Emmanouil Froudarakis; Jacob Reimer; Fabian H Sinz; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 69.504

7.  Nanowire arrays restore vision in blind mice.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Nan Qin; Yan Chong; Yupu Diao; Zhexuan Wang; Tian Xue; Min Jiang; Jiayi Zhang; Gengfeng Zheng
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  The spectral transmission of ocular media suggests ultraviolet sensitivity is widespread among mammals.

Authors:  R H Douglas; G Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Establishment and Characterization of a Unilateral UV-Induced Photoreceptor Degeneration Model in the C57Bl/6J Mouse.

Authors:  Anna-Marina van der Meer; Tanja Berger; Frank Müller; Ann Christina Foldenauer; Sandra Johnen; Peter Walter
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 10.  Ocular Clocks: Adapting Mechanisms for Eye Functions and Health.

Authors:  Marie-Paule Felder-Schmittbuhl; Ethan D Buhr; Ouria Dkhissi-Benyahya; David Hicks; Stuart N Peirson; Christophe P Ribelayga; Cristina Sandu; Rainer Spessert; Gianluca Tosini
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.