Literature DB >> 19925498

Can patients at high risk for significant colorectal neoplasms and having normal quantitative faecal occult blood test postpone elective colonoscopy?

R Hazazi1, P Rozen, M Leshno, Z Levi, Z Samuel, A Waked, A Vilkin, E Maoz, S Birkenfeld, Y Niv.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Common reasons for elective screening and surveillance colonoscopy, at predetermined intervals, are family or personal history of colorectal cancer (CRC) or advanced adenoma (AAP). Quantified, human haemoglobin (Hb)-specific, immunochemical faecal occult blood tests (I-FOBT) detect bleeding. AIM: To determine I-FOBT sensitivity for CRC or AAP before elective colonoscopy in patients at high-risk of cancer or advanced adenoma.
METHODS: Prospective double-blind study of 1000 ambulatory asymptomatic high-risk patients (555 family history of CRC, 445 surveillance for past neoplasm), who prepared three I-FOBTs before elective colonoscopy. I-FOBTs quantified as ngHb/mL of buffer by OC-MICRO instrument and results >or=50 ngHb/mL considered positive.
RESULTS: At colonoscopy, eight patients had CRC, 64 others had AAP. Sensitivity for CRC and/or AAP was the highest, 65.3% (95% CI 54.3, 76.3), when any of the three I-FOBTs was >or=50 ngHb (15.4%), with specificity of 87.5% (95% CI 86.4, 90.5) identifying all CRCs and 62% of AAPs.
CONCLUSIONS: All cancers or an AAP were detected every third I-FOBT-positive colonoscopy (47/154), so colonoscopy was potentially not needed at this time in 84.6% (846 patients). I-FOBT screening might provide effective supervision of high-risk patients, delaying unnecessary elective colonoscopies. This favourable evaluation needs confirmation and cost-benefit study by risk-group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19925498     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04202.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  10 in total

1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Patients at Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anastasia Katsoula; Paschalis Paschos; Anna-Bettina Haidich; Apostolos Tsapas; Olga Giouleme
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Potential of soluble CD26 as a serum marker for colorectal cancer detection.

Authors:  Oscar J Cordero; Monica Imbernon; Loretta De Chiara; Vicenta S Martinez-Zorzano; Daniel Ayude; Maria Paez de la Cadena; F Javier Rodriguez-Berrocal
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-10

3.  Serum CD26 is related to histopathological polyp traits and behaves as a marker for colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas.

Authors:  Loretta De Chiara; Ana M Rodríguez-Piñeiro; Francisco J Rodríguez-Berrocal; Oscar J Cordero; David Martínez-Ares; María Páez de la Cadena
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Faecal immunochemical test accuracy in patients referred for surveillance colonoscopy: a multi-centre cohort study.

Authors:  Jochim S Terhaar sive Droste; Sietze T van Turenhout; Frank A Oort; René W M van der Hulst; Vincent A Steeman; Usha Coblijn; Lisette van der Eem; Ruud Duijkers; Anneke A Bouman; Gerrit A Meijer; Annekatrien C T M Depla; Pieter Scholten; Ruud J L F Loffeld; Veerle M H Coupé; Chris J J Mulder
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Immunochemical fecal occult blood test for detection of advanced colonic adenomas and colorectal cancer: comparison with colonoscopy results.

Authors:  Bianca Rosa Viana Freitas; Cristiane Kibune Nagasako; Celia Regina Pavan; Sônia Letícia Silva Lorena; Fabio Guerrazzi; Cláudio Saddy Rodrigues Coy; Maria de Lourdes S Ayrizono; Maria Aparecida Mesquita
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Faecal haemoglobin and faecal calprotectin as indicators of bowel disease in patients presenting to primary care with bowel symptoms.

Authors:  Craig Mowat; Jayne Digby; Judith A Strachan; Robyn Wilson; Francis A Carey; Callum G Fraser; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) versus colonoscopy for surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Kate Wooldrage; Emma C Robbins; Ines Kralj-Hans; Eilidh MacRae; Carolyn Piggott; Iain Stenson; Aaron Prendergast; Bhavita Patel; Kevin Pack; Rosemary Howe; Nicholas Swart; Julia Snowball; Stephen W Duffy; Stephen Morris; Christian von Wagner; Stephen P Halloran; Wendy S Atkin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The performance of three-sample qualitative immunochemical fecal test to detect colorectal adenoma and cancer in gastrointestinal outpatients: an observational study.

Authors:  Dong Wu; Han-Qing Luo; Wei-Xun Zhou; Jia-Ming Qian; Jing-Nan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Faecal haemoglobin can define risk of colorectal neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jayne Digby; Shirley Cleary; Lynne Gray; Pooja Datt; David R Goudie; Robert J C Steele; Judith A Strachan; Adam Humphries; Callum G Fraser; Craig Mowat
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Lower gastrointestinal symptoms and symptoms-based triaging systems are poor predictors of clinical significant disease on colonoscopy.

Authors:  Mohd Syafiq Ismail; Olufemi Aoko; Sandeep Sihag; Eimear Connolly; Joseph Omorogbe; Serhiy Semenov; Neil O'Morain; Anthony O'Connor; Niall Breslin; Barbara Ryan; Deirdre McNamara
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.