Richard J Siegert1, Alan Tennant, Lynne Turner-Stokes. 1. Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, 3rd Floor, Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RJ, UK. richard.siegert@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE: To apply Rasch analysis to the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) responses of a mixed neurorehabilitation sample to determine its suitability for assessing depression among this group. METHOD: Three hundred and fifteen in-patients undergoing post-acute specialist in-patient rehabilitation at the Regional Rehabilitation Unit (RRU) of Northwick Park Hospital in North London were administered the Beck Depression Inventory. All patients were administered the BDI-II by a clinical psychologist using a large print version and taking as much time as patients required. Rasch analysis was completed using the RUMM2020 software. Where disordered thresholds were identified item rescoring was undertaken. Each item was also examined for Differential Item Functioning. Where misfit to model expectations was identified items were removed in an iterative fashion. The effect of any deletion upon person estimates was examined. Specific tests of unidimensionality were undertaken at each iterative phase. RESULTS: Rescoring was necessary before Items 1-4, 6, 8-12, 20 and 21 showed ordered thresholds. Three items failed to satisfy model expectations - items 16 (changes in sleeping pattern), 18 (changes in appetite) and 21 (loss of interest in sex) and were deleted - after which good overall fit to the Rasch model was observed. The three items deleted affected person estimates in a significant way such that the 21 item version in this group of patients may be biased because of multidimensionality. CONCLUSIONS: The BDI-II in a sample of patients undergoing neurorehabilitation satisfies unidimensional Rasch model expectations in an 18-item format. Some disordering of response categories was evident, but this evidence requires replication before any common rescoring option should be considered.
PURPOSE: To apply Rasch analysis to the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) responses of a mixed neurorehabilitation sample to determine its suitability for assessing depression among this group. METHOD: Three hundred and fifteen in-patients undergoing post-acute specialist in-patient rehabilitation at the Regional Rehabilitation Unit (RRU) of Northwick Park Hospital in North London were administered the Beck Depression Inventory. All patients were administered the BDI-II by a clinical psychologist using a large print version and taking as much time as patients required. Rasch analysis was completed using the RUMM2020 software. Where disordered thresholds were identified item rescoring was undertaken. Each item was also examined for Differential Item Functioning. Where misfit to model expectations was identified items were removed in an iterative fashion. The effect of any deletion upon person estimates was examined. Specific tests of unidimensionality were undertaken at each iterative phase. RESULTS: Rescoring was necessary before Items 1-4, 6, 8-12, 20 and 21 showed ordered thresholds. Three items failed to satisfy model expectations - items 16 (changes in sleeping pattern), 18 (changes in appetite) and 21 (loss of interest in sex) and were deleted - after which good overall fit to the Rasch model was observed. The three items deleted affected person estimates in a significant way such that the 21 item version in this group of patients may be biased because of multidimensionality. CONCLUSIONS: The BDI-II in a sample of patients undergoing neurorehabilitation satisfies unidimensional Rasch model expectations in an 18-item format. Some disordering of response categories was evident, but this evidence requires replication before any common rescoring option should be considered.
Authors: Thomas Forkmann; Maren Boecker; Markus Wirtz; Heide Glaesmer; Elmar Brähler; Christine Norra; Siegfried Gauggel Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Tracey A Davenport; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright; Ian B Hickie Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Barbora de Courten; Aya Mousa; Negar Naderpoor; Helena Teede; Maximilian P J de Courten; Robert Scragg Journal: Trials Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 2.279