Literature DB >> 19924006

Quantification of vertical ground reaction forces of popular bilateral plyometric exercises.

Brian J Wallace1, Thomas W Kernozek, James M White, Dennis E Kline, Glenn A Wright, Hsien-Te Peng, Chen-Fu Huang.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify the vertical ground reaction forces (VGRFs) developed during the performance of popular bilateral plyometric movements. Fourteen power-oriented track and field men of collegiate and national level randomly performed 3 trials of 9 different bilateral plyometric exercises in a single testing session. Three depth drop (DD) and 3 depth jump (DJ) conditions from 30, 60, and 90 cm heights (DD30, DD60, and DD90 and DJ30, DJ60, and DJ90) were tested, in addition to vertical jump (VJ), standing long jump (SLJ), and 2 consecutive jump (2CJ) conditions. Peak impact VGRFs were normalized to body weight. Additionally, all conditions were compared against the VJ in an intensity index. The SLJ condition resulted in a significantly higher peak VGRF than the 2CJ condition (p < or = 0.05). 90DD, 90DJ, 60DD, and SLJ had a significantly greater peak VGRF (5.39, 4.93, 4.30, and 4.22 times body weight, respectively) than the VJ condition (3.34 times body weight). The 30DJ condition had an insignificantly smaller peak VGRF (2.78 times body weight) when compared with the VJ. Practitioners may use these findings to more effectively progress athletes in these movements based on their intensities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19924006     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c3b841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

Review 1.  Optimising the Late-Stage Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sport Training and Testing Process After ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew Buckthorpe
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump.

Authors:  Raynier Montoro-Bombú; Lázaro de la Paz Arencibia; Carlo Buzzichelli; Paulo Miranda-Oliveira; Orlando Fernandes; Amândio Santos; Luis Rama
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  Programming Plyometric-Jump Training in Soccer: A Review.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Jason Moran; Jon L Oliver; Jason S Pedley; Rhodri S Lloyd; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

5.  Impact forces of plyometric exercises performed on land and in water.

Authors:  Orna A Donoghue; Hirofumi Shimojo; Hideki Takagi
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  The Effect of Aquatic Plyometric Training on Jump Performance Including a Four-week Follow-up in Youth Female Volleyball Players.

Authors:  Elisa Dell'Antonio; Caroline Ruschel; Marcel Hubert; Ricardo Dantas De Lucas; Alessandro Haupenthal; Helio Roesler
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.923

7.  The effects of single versus repeated plyometrics on landing biomechanics and jumping performance in men.

Authors:  H Makaruk; A Czaplicki; T Sacewicz; J Sadowski
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.806

Review 8.  Peak vertical ground reaction force during two-leg landing: a systematic review and mathematical modeling.

Authors:  Wenxin Niu; Tienan Feng; Chenghua Jiang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.