Literature DB >> 19923166

How soon can I be proficient in embryo transfer? Lessons from the cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM).

Lionel Dessolle1, Thomas Fréour, Paul Barrière, Miguel Jean, Célia Ravel, Emile Daraï, David J Biau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer, a crucial step for achieving pregnancy after in vitro fertilization, is an operator-dependent technique but the number of procedures required for a trainee to reach proficiency is unknown. We set out to evaluate the learning curve (LC) of embryo transfer using a specifically designed statistical tool.
METHODS: The first embryo transfers performed by five trainees were monitored by the cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM), a statistical tool designed to indicate when a process has reached a predefined level of performance. The main outcome measure was a positive hCG test. A 40% pregnancy rate (PR) per transfer was chosen to define adequate performance and a PR of 20% was considered inadequate. After the learning phase, standard CUSUM were implemented to ensure that performance was maintained. The same CUSUM parameters were also applied to monitor 241 consecutive embryo transfers performed by a senior gynaecologist.
RESULTS: Between 11 and 99 embryo transfers were necessary for the trainees to reach the predefined level of performance. Simple and intuitive graphical representations of the LCs were generated. CUSUM tests confirmed that performance was maintained after the learning phase. The PR of the senior gynaecologist was 42.7% and the CUSUM showed that performance remained adequate throughout the 241 procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an exportable model for a quantitative monitoring of the LC of embryo transfer as well as a reference curve for continuous monitoring of performance in embryo transfer. The length of the LC of embryo transfer is highly variable, justifying a tailored training to learn this procedure.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19923166     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

1.  Opinion : how should we define success in assisted reproduction? is live birth rate the gold standard measurement?

Authors:  Ulun Ulug; Izhar Ben-Shlomo; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Do trained reproductive endocrinologists perform better than their trainees? Comparing clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates after transfer of single fresh blastocysts.

Authors:  Sadikah Behbehani; Joseph Hasson; Stefano Polesello; W Y Son; Togas Tulandi; William Buckett
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Proficiency in oocyte retrieval: how many procedures are necessary for training?

Authors:  Kara N Goldman; Kimberly S Moon; Belinda J Yauger; Mark D Payson; James H Segars; Barbara J Stegmann
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Are we ready to inject? Individualized LC-CUSUM training in ICSI.

Authors:  Mercè Durban; Désireé García; Albert Obradors; Valerie Vernaeve; Rita Vassena
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Learning Curve of C-Arm Cone-beam Computed Tomography Virtual Navigation-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy.

Authors:  Su Yeon Ahn; Chang Min Park; Soon Ho Yoon; Hyungjin Kim; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon's Experience.

Authors:  Ding Ding; Hongyuan Jiang; Jichan Nie; Xishi Liu; Sun-Wei Guo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-08-08

7.  The human factor: does the operator performing the embryo transfer significantly impact the cycle outcome?

Authors:  F Cirillo; P Patrizio; M Baccini; E Morenghi; C Ronchetti; L Cafaro; E Zannoni; A Baggiani; P E Levi-Setti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Analyzing the learning curve of vaginal pelvic reconstruction surgery with and without mesh by the cumulative summation test (CUSUM).

Authors:  Chin-Jui Wu; Kuan-Ju Huang; Wen-Chun Chang; Ying-Xuan Li; Lin-Hung Wei; Bor-Ching Sheu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Ga Won Yim; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Student attainment of proficiency in a clinical skill: the assessment of individual learning curves.

Authors:  Robert D Campbell; Kent G Hecker; David J Biau; Daniel S J Pang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.