INTRODUCTION: The fetal membrane (FM) layers, amnion and choriodecidua, are frequently noted to have varying degrees of separation following delivery. FM layers normally separate prior to rupture during in vitro biomechanical testing. We hypothesized that the adherence between amnion and choriodecidua decreases prior to delivery resulting in separation of the FM layers and facilitating FM rupture. METHODS: FM from 232 consecutively delivered patients were examined to determine the extent of spontaneous separation of the FM layers at delivery. Percent separation was determined by the weight of separated FM tissue divided by the total FM weight. Separately, the adherence between intact FM layers was determined. FM adherence was tested following term vaginal delivery (13), term unlabored cesarean section (10), and preterm delivery (6). RESULTS: Subjects enrolled in the two studies had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. FM separation was present in 92.1% of membranes. Only 4.3% of FM delivered following spontaneous rupture of the fetal membranes (SROM) had no detectable separation. 64.7% of FM had greater than 10% separation. FM from term vaginal deliveries had significantly more separation and were less adherent than FM of term unlabored, elective cesarean section (39.0+/-34.4% vs 22.5+/-30.9%, p=.046 and 0.041+/-0.018N/cm vs 0.048+/-0.019N/cm, p<.005). Preterm FM had less separation and were more adherent than term FM (9.95+/-17.7% vs 37.5+/-34.4% and 0.070+/-0.040N/cm vs 0.044+/-0.020N/cm; both p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Separation of the amnion from choriodecidua at delivery is almost universal. Increased separation is associated with decreased adherence as measured in vitro. Increased separation and decreased adherence are seen both with increasing gestation and with labor suggesting both biochemical and mechanical etiologies. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that FM layer separation is part of the FM weakening process during normal parturition.
INTRODUCTION: The fetal membrane (FM) layers, amnion and choriodecidua, are frequently noted to have varying degrees of separation following delivery. FM layers normally separate prior to rupture during in vitro biomechanical testing. We hypothesized that the adherence between amnion and choriodecidua decreases prior to delivery resulting in separation of the FM layers and facilitating FM rupture. METHODS: FM from 232 consecutively delivered patients were examined to determine the extent of spontaneous separation of the FM layers at delivery. Percent separation was determined by the weight of separated FM tissue divided by the total FM weight. Separately, the adherence between intact FM layers was determined. FM adherence was tested following term vaginal delivery (13), term unlabored cesarean section (10), and preterm delivery (6). RESULTS: Subjects enrolled in the two studies had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. FM separation was present in 92.1% of membranes. Only 4.3% of FM delivered following spontaneous rupture of the fetal membranes (SROM) had no detectable separation. 64.7% of FM had greater than 10% separation. FM from term vaginal deliveries had significantly more separation and were less adherent than FM of term unlabored, elective cesarean section (39.0+/-34.4% vs 22.5+/-30.9%, p=.046 and 0.041+/-0.018N/cm vs 0.048+/-0.019N/cm, p<.005). Preterm FM had less separation and were more adherent than term FM (9.95+/-17.7% vs 37.5+/-34.4% and 0.070+/-0.040N/cm vs 0.044+/-0.020N/cm; both p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Separation of the amnion from choriodecidua at delivery is almost universal. Increased separation is associated with decreased adherence as measured in vitro. Increased separation and decreased adherence are seen both with increasing gestation and with labor suggesting both biochemical and mechanical etiologies. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that FM layer separation is part of the FM weakening process during normal parturition.
Authors: M Meinert; G V Eriksen; A C Petersen; R B Helmig; C Laurent; N Uldbjerg; A Malmström Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Roman M Sydorak; Shinjiro Hirose; Per L Sandberg; Roy A Filly; Michael R Harrison; Diana L Farmer; Craig T Albanese Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Roberto Romero; Adi L Tarca; Pooja Mittal; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Offer Erez; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John Hotra; Nandor Gabor Than; Jung-Sun Kim; Sonia S Hassan; Chong Jai Kim Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: N Rangaswamy; A Abdelrahim; R M Moore; L Uyen; B M Mercer; J M Mansour; D Kumar; J Sawady; J J Moore Journal: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Date: 2011-05-23
Authors: Brian M Mercer; Adli Abdelrahim; Robert M Moore; Jillian Novak; Deepak Kumar; Joseph M Mansour; Marina Perez-Fournier; Cynthia J Milluzzi; John J Moore Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: R M Moore; F Schatz; D Kumar; B M Mercer; A Abdelrahim; N Rangaswamy; C Bartel; J M Mansour; C J Lockwood; J J Moore Journal: Placenta Date: 2010-08-14 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: D Kumar; F Schatz; R M Moore; B M Mercer; N Rangaswamy; J M Mansour; C J Lockwood; J J Moore Journal: Placenta Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Ramkumar Menon; Elizabeth A Bonney; Jennifer Condon; Sam Mesiano; Robert N Taylor Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 15.610