OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of urinary 3-hydroxybenzo[a]pyrene (3-OH-B[a]P) as a biomarker of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in various environmental exposure scenarios alongside the more usually studied 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OH-Pyr). METHODS: Two groups of 15 and 10 non smoking, healthy men and women, were exposed for approximately 6h to ambient air at two outdoor locations close to metallurgical industries, and at one indoor location in an urban setting. Atmospheric measurements of 16 "priority" PAHs were carried out during each exposure. Urinary 1-OH-Pyr and 3-OH-B[a]P were also analysed, samples being taken the morning before exposure, at the end of exposure, then 4 and 15 h after the end of exposure. Urinary 1-OH-Pyr and 3-OH-B[a]P were analysed using high performance liquid chromatograph with fluorescence detection. Limits of detection (LOD) were 0.092 nmol/L and 0.28 pmol/L for 1-OH-Pyr and 3-OH-B[a]P respectively. RESULTS: Average ambient air concentrations varied from 0.27 to 2.87 ng/m(3) for pyrene, 0.04 to 1.20 ng/m(3) for B[a]P, and from 70.0 to 910.6 ng/m(3) for the sum of the 16 PAH (SigmaPAHs). Concentrations of 1-OH-Pyr were not correlated with atmospheric concentrations of PAHs to which subjects were exposed, nor with the concentrations of 3-OH-B[a]P. Nearly 80% of measurements of 3-OH-B[a]P were lower than the LOD and no relationship between atmospheric concentrations and urinary metabolites was observable. However, the percentage of post-exposure values of 3-OH-B[a]P greater than the LOD increased significantly with the median of atmospheric concentrations of Pyr, B[a]P and SigmaPAH at the different sites (test of linear trend, p<0.02 in all cases). CONCLUSION: Although we used very sensitive techniques for the measurements of urinary metabolites, especially for 3-OH-B[a]P, neither 1-OH-Pyr nor 3-OH-B[a]P were an unequivocal biomarker of exposure to atmospheric PAHs in environmental exposure scenarios relevant to the general population. It would be interesting to investigate other urinary monohydroxy PAH metabolites in this context. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of urinary 3-hydroxybenzo[a]pyrene (3-OH-B[a]P) as a biomarker of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in various environmental exposure scenarios alongside the more usually studied 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OH-Pyr). METHODS: Two groups of 15 and 10 non smoking, healthy men and women, were exposed for approximately 6h to ambient air at two outdoor locations close to metallurgical industries, and at one indoor location in an urban setting. Atmospheric measurements of 16 "priority" PAHs were carried out during each exposure. Urinary 1-OH-Pyr and 3-OH-B[a]P were also analysed, samples being taken the morning before exposure, at the end of exposure, then 4 and 15 h after the end of exposure. Urinary 1-OH-Pyr and 3-OH-B[a]P were analysed using high performance liquid chromatograph with fluorescence detection. Limits of detection (LOD) were 0.092 nmol/L and 0.28 pmol/L for 1-OH-Pyr and 3-OH-B[a]P respectively. RESULTS: Average ambient air concentrations varied from 0.27 to 2.87 ng/m(3) for pyrene, 0.04 to 1.20 ng/m(3) for B[a]P, and from 70.0 to 910.6 ng/m(3) for the sum of the 16 PAH (SigmaPAHs). Concentrations of 1-OH-Pyr were not correlated with atmospheric concentrations of PAHs to which subjects were exposed, nor with the concentrations of 3-OH-B[a]P. Nearly 80% of measurements of 3-OH-B[a]P were lower than the LOD and no relationship between atmospheric concentrations and urinary metabolites was observable. However, the percentage of post-exposure values of 3-OH-B[a]P greater than the LOD increased significantly with the median of atmospheric concentrations of Pyr, B[a]P and SigmaPAH at the different sites (test of linear trend, p<0.02 in all cases). CONCLUSION: Although we used very sensitive techniques for the measurements of urinary metabolites, especially for 3-OH-B[a]P, neither 1-OH-Pyr nor 3-OH-B[a]P were an unequivocal biomarker of exposure to atmospheric PAHs in environmental exposure scenarios relevant to the general population. It would be interesting to investigate other urinary monohydroxy PAH metabolites in this context. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: Noel J Aquilina; Juana Mari Delgado-Saborit; Claire Meddings; Stephen Baker; Roy M Harrison; Peyton Jacob; Margaret Wilson; Lisa Yu; Minjiang Duan; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Environ Int Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Parinaz Poursafa; Mohammad Mehdi Amin; Yaghoub Hajizadeh; Marjan Mansourian; Hamidreza Pourzamani; Karim Ebrahim; Babak Sadeghian; Roya Kelishadi Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Oleksii Motorykin; Jill Schrlau; Yuling Jia; Barbara Harper; Stuart Harris; Anna Harding; David Stone; Molly Kile; Daniel Sudakin; Staci L Massey Simonich Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Lucia G Pruneda-Álvarez; Francisco J Pérez-Vázquez; Tania Ruíz-Vera; Ángeles C Ochoa-Martínez; Sandra T Orta-García; Jorge A Jiménez-Avalos; Iván N Pérez-Maldonado Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2015-12-12 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Holly M Dixon; Richard P Scott; Darrell Holmes; Lehyla Calero; Laurel D Kincl; Katrina M Waters; David E Camann; Antonia M Calafat; Julie B Herbstman; Kim A Anderson Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 4.142