Literature DB >> 19922911

Indoor air pollution, cookstove quality, and housing characteristics in two Honduran communities.

Maggie L Clark1, Stephen J Reynolds, James B Burch, Stuart Conway, Annette M Bachand, Jennifer L Peel.   

Abstract

Elevated indoor air pollution exposures associated with the burning of biomass fuels in developing countries are well established. Improved cookstoves have the potential to substantially reduce these exposures. However, few studies have quantitatively evaluated exposure reductions associated with the introduction of improved stoves, likely due to the cost and time-intensive nature of such evaluations. Several studies have demonstrated the value of estimating indoor air pollution exposures by evaluating personal cooking practices and household parameters in addition to stove type. We assessed carbon monoxide (n=54) and fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) (n=58) levels among non-smoking Honduran women cooking with traditional or improved wood-burning cookstoves in two communities, one semi-urban and one rural. Exposure concentrations were assessed via 8-h indoor monitoring, as well as 8-h personal PM(2.5) monitoring. Housing characteristics were determined to indicate ventilation that may affect carbon monoxide and PM(2.5). Stove quality was assessed using a four-level subjective scale representing the potential for indoor emissions, ranging from poorly functioning traditional stoves to well-functioning improved stoves. Univariately, the stove scale as compared to stove type (traditional versus improved) accounted for a higher percent of the variation in pollutant concentrations; for example, the stove scale predicted 79% of the variation and the stove type predicted 54% of the variation in indoor carbon monoxide concentrations. In multivariable models, the stove scale, age of the stove, and ventilation factors predicted more than 50% of the variation in personal and indoor PM(2.5) and 85% of the variation in indoor carbon monoxide. Results indicate that using type of stove alone as a proxy for exposure may lead to exposure misclassification and potentially biased exposure and health effects relationships. Utilizing stove quality and housing characteristics that influence ventilation may provide a viable alternative to the more time- and cost-intensive pollutant assessments for larger-scale studies. Designing kitchens with proper ventilation structures could lead to improved indoor environments, especially important in areas where biomass will continue to be the preferred and necessary cooking fuel for some time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19922911     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  25 in total

1.  Kitchen concentrations of fine particulate matter and particle number concentration in households using biomass cookstoves in rural Honduras.

Authors:  Megan L Benka-Coker; Jennifer L Peel; John Volckens; Nicholas Good; Kelsey R Bilsback; Christian L'Orange; Casey Quinn; Bonnie N Young; Sarah Rajkumar; Ander Wilson; Jessica Tryner; Sebastian Africano; Anibal B Osorto; Maggie L Clark
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Proinflammatory Effects in Ex Vivo Human Lung Tissue of Respirable Smoke Extracts from Indoor Cooking in Nepal.

Authors:  Binaya Kc; Parth Sarathi Mahapatra; Dhruma Thakker; Amanda P Henry; Charlotte K Billington; Ian Sayers; Siva Praveen Puppala; Ian P Hall
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-06

3.  'Oorja' in India: Assessing a large-scale commercial distribution of advanced biomass stoves to households.

Authors:  Mark C Thurber; Himani Phadke; Sriniketh Nagavarapu; Gireesh Shrimali; Hisham Zerriffi
Journal:  Energy Sustain Dev       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Indoor Air Quality in Central Appalachia Homes Impacted by Wood and Coal Use.

Authors:  Laura M Paulin; D'Ann Williams; Charles Oberweiser; Gregory B Diette; Patrick N Breysse; Meredith M McCormack; Elizabeth C Matsui; Roger Peng; Tricia A Metts; Nadia N Hansel
Journal:  J Environ Prot (Irvine, Calif)       Date:  2013-01

Review 5.  Ambient and household air pollution: complex triggers of disease.

Authors:  Stephen A Farmer; Timothy D Nelin; Michael J Falvo; Loren E Wold
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Combining sensor-based measurement and modeling of PM2.5 and black carbon in assessing exposure to indoor aerosols.

Authors:  Jennie Cox; Seung-Hyun Cho; Patrick Ryan; Kelechi Isiugo; James Ross; Steven Chillrud; Zheng Zhu; Roman Jandarov; Sergey A Grinshpun; Tiina Reponen
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Pilot Intervention Study of Household Ventilation and Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations in a Low-Income Urban Area, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Anne M Weaver; Shahana Parveen; Doli Goswami; Christina Crabtree-Ide; Carole Rudra; Jihnhee Yu; Lina Mu; Alicia M Fry; Iffat Sharmin; Stephen P Luby; Pavani K Ram
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Changes to indoor air quality as a result of relocating families from slums to public housing.

Authors:  Soledad Burgos; Pablo Ruiz; Rosalina Koifman
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Chimney stoves modestly improved indoor air quality measurements compared with traditional open fire stoves: results from a small-scale intervention study in rural Peru.

Authors:  S M Hartinger; A A Commodore; J Hattendorf; C F Lanata; A I Gil; H Verastegui; M Aguilar-Villalobos; D Mäusezahl; L P Naeher
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 5.770

10.  Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollution- related Health Problem in Ethiopia: Review of Related Literature.

Authors:  Worku Tefera; Araya Asfaw; Frank Gilliland; Alemayehu Worku; Mehari Wondimagegn; Abera Kumie; Jonathan Samet; Kiros Berhane
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Dev       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.