Literature DB >> 19922879

Comparison of insulin detemir and insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen, with insulin aspart as the mealtime insulin, in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 52-week, multinational, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target noninferiority trial.

Simon Heller1, Christoph Koenen, Bruce Bode.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary study objective was to determine whether insulin detemir (detemir) was noninferior to insulin glargine (glargine) as the basal insulin in a basal-bolus regimen, with insulin aspart as the mealtime insulin, in terms of glycemic control at the end of 52 weeks in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
METHODS: This multinational, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target, noninferiority trial enrolled patients aged > or = 18 years who had had T1DM for at least 12 months, had been taking a basal-bolus insulin regimen for at least 3 months, and had a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value < or = 11.0% at screening. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either detemir or glargine for 52 weeks. The basal insulin was initially administered once daily (in the evening) in both groups; if patients in the detemir group were achieving the plasma glucose (PG) target before breakfast but not before dinner, they were switched to twice-daily administration. Glargine was administered once daily throughout the trial, according to its approved labeling. Each patient attended 13 study visits and received 16 scheduled telephone calls from the trial site. The primary efficacy end point was glycemic control (HbA1c) after 52 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included the number of patients achieving an HbA1c value < or = 7.0%, with or without a major hypoglycemic episode in the last month of treatment; fasting PG (FPG); within-patient variation in self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) before breakfast and dinner; and 10-point SMPG profiles. The noninferiority margin was 0.4%, consistent with US Food and Drug Administration guidelines.
RESULTS: Four hundred forty-three patients (mean [SD] age, 42 [12] years; body mass index, 26.5 [4.0] kg/m2; duration of diabetes, 17.2 [11.4] years; HbA1c, 8.1% [1.1%]) received study treatment. After 52 weeks, the estimated mean HbA1c did not differ significantly between the detemir and glargine groups (7.57% and 7.56%, respectively; mean difference, 0.01%; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.16), consistent with the noninferiority of detemir to glargine. The corresponding estimated changes in HbA1c were -0.53% and -0.54%. In the 90 patients who completed the trial on once-daily detemir and the 173 patients who completed the trial on twice-daily detemir, the estimated changes in HbA1c were -0.49% and -0.58%, respectively. After 52 weeks, there were no significant differences in the proportions of those receiving detemir and glargine who achieved an HbA1c value < or = 7.0% without major hypoglycemia (31.9% and 28.9%, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences in estimated mean FPG (8.58 and 8.81 mmol/L; mean difference, -0.23 mmol/L; 95% CI, -1.04 to 0.58) or in basal insulin doses. The basal insulin dose was numerically higher in patients receiving detemir twice rather than once daily (0.47 vs 0.33 U/kg, respectively). The relative risks for total and nocturnal hypoglycemia with detemir versus glargine were 0.94 and 1.12, respectively (both, P = NS). Six patients (2.0%) randomized to the detemir group and 4 (2.7%) randomized to the glargine group withdrew due to adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: During 52 weeks of basal-bolus therapy in patients with T1DM, detemir was noninferior to glargine in terms of overall glycemic control (HbA1c). When used according to the approved labeling, detemir and glargine did not differ in tolerability or in terms of the occurrence of hypoglycemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19922879     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  28 in total

Review 1.  Reporting Severe Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes: Facts and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard; Birger Thorsteinsson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time.

Authors:  Chantal Mathieu; Pieter Gillard; Katrien Benhalima
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  International Forum for the Advancement of Diabetes Research and Care, April 29-30, 2011, Athens, Greece.

Authors:  Geremia B Bolli; Larry C Deeb; Satish K Garg; John L Leahy; Roger S Mazze; David R Owens; Matthew C Riddle; Phil Southerland; Ellie S Strock
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  [Costs of diabetes care and treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes patients treated with a basal-bolus (ICT) insulin regimen in outpatient care: results of the LIVE-COM study].

Authors:  Ralph Achim Bierwirth; Thomas Kohlmann; Jörn Moock; Rolf Holle; Wolfgang Landgraf
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2010-12-07

5.  A comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of 100 and 200 U/mL formulations of ultra-long-acting insulin degludec.

Authors:  Stefan Korsatko; Sigrid Deller; Gerd Koehler; Julia K Mader; Katharina Neubauer; Charlotte L Adrian; Henrik Thomsen; Hanne Haahr; Thomas R Pieber
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Chitosan-zinc-insulin complex incorporated thermosensitive polymer for controlled delivery of basal insulin in vivo.

Authors:  Mayura Oak; Jagdish Singh
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 7.  An update on the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on insulin detemir, a long-acting human insulin analog.

Authors:  Katarina Raslova
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-06-01

8.  Drug Development and Potential Regulatory Paths for Insulin Biosimilars.

Authors:  Mukul Minocha; Jogarao Gobburu
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01

Review 9.  Insulin detemir: a review of its use in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine versus detemir analysis in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thales B C Silva; Paulo H R F Almeida; Vania E Araújo; Francisco de Assis Acurcio; Augusto A Guerra Júnior; Brian Godman; Juliana Alvares
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.