Literature DB >> 19922820

Material properties of mandibular cortical bone in the American alligator, Alligator mississippiensis.

Uriel Zapata1, Keith Metzger, Qian Wang, Ruth M Elsey, Callum F Ross, Paul C Dechow.   

Abstract

This study reports the elastic material properties of cortical bone in the mandible of juvenile Alligator mississippiensis obtained by using an ultrasonic wave technique. The elastic modulus, the shear modulus, and Poisson's ratio were measured on 42 cylindrical Alligator bone specimens obtained from the lingual and facial surfaces of 4 fresh Alligator mandibles. The data suggest that the elastic properties of alligator mandibular cortical bone are similar to those found in mammals and are orthotropic. The properties most resemble those found in the cortex of mammalian postcranial long bones where the bone is most stiff in one direction and much less stiff in the two remaining orthogonal directions. This is different from cortical bone found in the mandibles of humans and some monkeys, where the bone has greatest stiffness in one direction, much less stiffness in another direction, and an intermediate amount in the third orthogonal direction. This difference suggests a relationship between levels of orthotropy and bending stress. The comparability of these elastic moduli to those of other vertebrates suggest that the high bone strain magnitudes recorded from the alligator mandible in vivo are not attributable to a lower stiffness of alligator mandibular bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19922820     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  11 in total

1.  Elastic anisotropy and off-axis ultrasonic velocity distribution in human cortical bone.

Authors:  Dong Hwa Chung; Paul C Dechow
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The impact of bone and suture material properties on mandibular function in Alligator mississippiensis: testing theoretical phenotypes with finite element analysis.

Authors:  David A Reed; Laura B Porro; Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Justin B Lemberg; Casey M Holliday; Fred Anapol; Callum F Ross
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Edentulism, beaks, and biomechanical innovations in the evolution of theropod dinosaurs.

Authors:  Stephan Lautenschlager; Lawrence M Witmer; Perle Altangerel; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sensitivity and ex vivo validation of finite element models of the domestic pig cranium.

Authors:  Jen A Bright; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Functional anatomy and feeding biomechanics of a giant Upper Jurassic pliosaur (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from Weymouth Bay, Dorset, UK.

Authors:  Davide Foffa; Andrew R Cuff; Judyth Sassoon; Emily J Rayfield; Mark N Mavrogordato; Michael J Benton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  In vivo bone strain and finite element modeling of the mandible of Alligator mississippiensis.

Authors:  Laura B Porro; Keith A Metzger; Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Callum F Ross
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Strain in the ostrich mandible during simulated pecking and validation of specimen-specific finite element models.

Authors:  Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Beware the black box: investigating the sensitivity of FEA simulations to modelling factors in comparative biomechanics.

Authors:  Christopher W Walmsley; Matthew R McCurry; Phillip D Clausen; Colin R McHenry
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Feeding mechanics in spinosaurid theropods and extant crocodilians.

Authors:  Andrew R Cuff; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Validation experiments on finite element models of an ostrich (Struthio camelus) cranium.

Authors:  Andrew R Cuff; Jen A Bright; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.