Literature DB >> 19922694

Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle.

Klara L Verbyla1, Ben J Hayes, Philip J Bowman, Michael E Goddard.   

Abstract

Genomic selection describes a selection strategy based on genomic breeding values predicted from dense single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Multiple methods have been proposed but the critical issue is how to decide whether an SNP should be included in the predictive set to estimate breeding values. One major disadvantage of the traditional Bayes B approach is its high computational demands caused by the changing dimensionality of the models. The use of stochastic search variable selection (SSVS) retains the same assumptions about the distribution of SNP effects as Bayes B, while maintaining constant dimensionality. When Bayesian SSVS was used to predict genomic breeding values for real dairy data over a range of traits it produced accuracies higher or equivalent to other genomic selection methods with significantly decreased computational and time demands than Bayes B.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19922694     DOI: 10.1017/S0016672309990243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  44 in total

1.  Sensitivity of genomic selection to using different prior distributions.

Authors:  Klara L Verbyla; Philip J Bowman; Ben J Hayes; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2010-03-31

2.  Back to basics for Bayesian model building in genomic selection.

Authors:  Hanni P Kärkkäinen; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Selfing for the design of genomic selection experiments in biparental plant populations.

Authors:  Benjamin McClosky; Jason LaCombe; Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genome-Wide Association Analyses Based on Broadly Different Specifications for Prior Distributions, Genomic Windows, and Estimation Methods.

Authors:  Chunyu Chen; Juan P Steibel; Robert J Tempelman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Inference of posterior inclusion probability of QTLs in Bayesian shrinkage analysis.

Authors:  Deguang Yang; Shanshan Han; Dan Jiang; Runqing Yang; Ming Fang
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle.

Authors:  Vinzent Boerner; David J Johnston; Bruce Tier
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.

Authors:  Mario Pl Calus; Heyun Huang; Addie Vereijken; Jeroen Visscher; Jan Ten Napel; Jack J Windig
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.

Authors:  Mario Pl Calus; Chris Schrooten; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Jennie Pryce; Amanda J Chamberlain; Phil J Bowman; Mike E Goddard
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Phillip J Bowman; Amanda C Chamberlain; Klara Verbyla; Mike E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.