Literature DB >> 19922593

Chromogenic in situ hybridization for Her-2/neu-oncogene in breast cancer: comparison of a new dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Doris Mayr1, Sibylle Heim, Kerstin Weyrauch, Evelyn Zeindl-Eberhart, Anne Kunz, Jutta Engel, Thomas Kirchner.   

Abstract

AIMS: Her-2/neu testing is used as a marker for Herceptin therapy. The aim was to investigate new dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), in a large number of breast carcinomas (n = 205) with DNA-specific dual-colour probes (ZytoVision, Bremerhaven, Germany) and to compare the results with immunohistochemistry (n = 205) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (n = 129). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Paraffin-embedded tissue of 205 patients was used. After immunohistochemistry with a focus on immunohistochemically uncertain cases, Her-2/neu amplification using dual-colour CISH (ZytoVision) was analysed. Validation by FISH was performed. The results were: immunohistochemistry, 27.8% with strong expression, 53.7% with uncertain overexpression and 18.5% with no expression; FISH, 25.6% amplified and 74.4% negative; CISH, 35.6% amplified, 62.9% negative and 1.5% not evaluable. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with CISH: CISH negative in 100% with immunohistochemistry 0/1+, amplified in 82.5% with immunohistochemistry 3+; 5.9% contradictory results: 4.4% immunohistochemistry 3+ and negative by CISH, 1.5% negative in immunohistochemistry but amplified by CISH; FISH (129 cases), 8.5% contradictory results to immunohistochemistry, 6.2% immunohistochemistry 3+ and negative by FISH, 2.3% negative by immunohistochemistry and amplified by FISH; comparison of CISH and FISH, 94.6% same results, 3.9% different ones, 1.6% CISH not analysable.
CONCLUSIONS: CISH, using dual-colour probes (ZytoVision) is as good as FISH for Her-2/neu analysis. The few discrepant results are likely to be caused by polysomy or tumour heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19922593     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03427.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  12 in total

1.  HER2 amplification, overexpression and score criteria in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yingchuan Hu; Santhoshi Bandla; Tony E Godfrey; Dongfeng Tan; James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Xing Qiu; David G Hicks; Jeffrey H Peters; Zhongren Zhou
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  Out of the darkness and into the light: bright field in situ hybridisation for delineation of ERBB2 (HER2) status in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Aaron M Gruver; Ziad Peerwani; Raymond R Tubbs
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Accurate assessment of HER2 gene status for invasive component of breast cancer by combination of immunohistochemistry and chromogenic In Situ hybridization.

Authors:  Xiu Nie; Jun He; Yan Li; Dan-Zhen Pan; Hua-Xiong Pan; Mi-Xia Weng; Xiu-Ping Yang; Chun-Ping Liu; Tao Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-17

4.  Y-chromosome status identification suggests a recipient origin of posttransplant non-small cell lung carcinomas: chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Sergey V Brodsky; Weiqiang Zhao; Gregory A Otterson; Miguel Villalona-Calero; Anjali A Satoskar; Ayesha Hasan; Ronald Pelletier; Iouri Ivanov; Patrick Ross; Tibor Nadasdy; Konstantin Shilo
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Hybridization for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastric carcinoma: a comparison of fluorescence in-situ hybridization with a novel fully automated dual-colour silver in-situ hybridization method.

Authors:  Elena García-García; Carlos Gómez-Martín; Bárbara Angulo; Esther Conde; Ana Suárez-Gauthier; Magdalena Adrados; Cristian Perna; José Luis Rodríguez-Peralto; Manuel Hidalgo; Fernando López-Ríos
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Tim S Poulsen; Maiken L M Espersen; Vibeke Kofoed; Tanja Dabetic; Estrid Høgdall; Eva Balslev
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-12-05

7.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Comparison of automated and manual FISH for evaluation of HER2 gene status on breast carcinoma core biopsies.

Authors:  Christian Ohlschlegel; Doris Kradolfer; Margreth Hell; Wolfram Jochum
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-04-20

9.  EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study.

Authors:  Vanessa Fátima Bernardes; Frederico Omar Gleber-Netto; Sílvia Ferreira de Sousa; Rafael Malagoli Rocha; Maria Cássia Ferreira de Aguiar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  MiR-192 directly binds and regulates Dicer1 expression in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Galina Feinberg-Gorenshtein; Avital Guedj; Keren Shichrur; Marta Jeison; Drorit Luria; Yona Kodman; Shifra Ash; Meora Feinmesser; Liat Edry; Noam Shomron; Abraham Weizman; Isaac Yaniv; Smadar Avigad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.