Literature DB >> 19921442

Male terminalia variation in the rainforest dwelling Drosophila teissieri contrasts with the sperm pattern and species stability.

Dominique Joly1, Marie-Louise Cariou, Tendai Mhlanga-Mutangadura, Daniel Lachaise.   

Abstract

It is commonly recognized that speciation does not necessarily imply extensive variation between populations, and what the speciation process per se consists of still remains an unanswered question. We advocate here that the variation of male terminalia does not necessarily result in noticeable reproductive isolation. We report whether there is invariance or variance of traits central to sexual selection processes (i.e. male terminalia and sperm length) compared to traits which are generally assumed to vary more neutrally (i.e. allozymes) in the strictly Afrotropical forest-dwelling continental species Drosophila teissieri. Three geographic blocks can be recognized along the present range of the species. Our data suggest that the components of the species integrity do not obey the variance/invariance alternative consistently. Male terminalia and allozymes show extensive variation while sperm length distribution is strikingly similar between the geographic blocks. It is therefore inferred that sperm length might be one of the major targets of stabilizing selection. Finally, it is suggested that the striking fit between the extent of sperm heteromorphism (within male) and sperm polymorphism (between males) is instrumental in maintaining the species integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19921442     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-009-9423-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  14 in total

1.  Pre-reproductive isolation as a consequence of allopatric differentiation between populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W Haerty; M Lesbats; P Capy
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 2.  The evolutionary genetics of speciation.

Authors:  J A Coyne; H A Orr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  SPERM DEPENDENCE OF FEMALE RECEPTIVITY TO REMATING IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Mark H Gromko; Mary Ellen A Newport; Maria G Kortier
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Amylase gene duplication: an ancestral trait in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  O Daïnou; M L Cariou; J R David; D Hickey
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila.

Authors:  M Solignac; M Monnerot; J C Mounolou
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition.

Authors:  M Higgie; S Chenoweth; M W Blows
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  VARIATIONS IN CUTICULAR HYDROCARBONS AMONG THE EIGHT SPECIES OF THE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER SUBGROUP.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Jallon; Jean R David
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  How two Afrotropical endemics made two cosmopolitan human commensals: the Drosophila melanogaster-D. simulans palaeogeographic riddle.

Authors:  Daniel Lachaise; Jean-François Silvain
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Species-specific effects of single sensillum ablation on mating position in Drosophila.

Authors:  Angel Acebes; Matthew Cobb; Jean-François Ferveur
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Coevolution of male and female reproductive structures in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dominique Joly; Michele Schiffer
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.082

View more
  2 in total

1.  Wolbachia in the Drosophila yakuba Complex: Pervasive Frequency Variation and Weak Cytoplasmic Incompatibility, but No Apparent Effect on Reproductive Isolation.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Paul S Ginsberg; Michael Turelli; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Coevolution between male and female genitalia in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  Amir Yassin; Virginie Orgogozo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.