Literature DB >> 19921081

Factors used by female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellowship directors to select their fellows.

Tyler M Muffly1, Emily R Penick, Fengming Tang, Aaron J Bonham, Roger P Smith, Richard F C Hill, Roberta E Blandon.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We report the attributes of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPM&RS) fellowship applicants that are most valued by fellowship program directors during the ranking process.
METHODS: Anonymous questionnaires were filled out by FPM&RS fellowship program directors following the 2008 match. The survey was designed to assess the relative importance of various factors in the ranking of fellowship applicants.
RESULTS: Surveys were sent to 67 program directors, and 21 completed the survey (31%). Items ranked as the most important in the selection process were a high quality obstetrics and gynecology residency education (8.2+/-1.2), followed by clinical research experience (7.4+/-1.4). Ability to work well with staff and work ethic were considered to be the most important subjective criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results support anecdotal evidence that placed emphasis on research experience and interpersonal skills in the selection of FPM&RS fellows.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19921081     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-1038-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  8 in total

1.  Factors used by pediatric emergency medicine program directors to select their fellows.

Authors:  Michael P Poirier; Charles W Pruitt
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.454

2.  Comparative analysis of successful and unsuccessful candidates for the pediatric surgical matching program.

Authors:  M A Hirthler; P L Glick; J M Hassett; J Rossman; P Mendola; J E Allen; T C Jewett; D R Cooney
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Cost considerations and applicant characteristics for the Pediatric Surgery Match.

Authors:  Danny C Little; Suzanne M Yoder; Tracy C Grikscheit; Carl-Christian A Jackson; Julie R Fuchs; Kimberly W McCrudden; George W Holcomb
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Selection criteria for the integrated model of plastic surgery residency.

Authors:  Jeffrey R LaGrasso; Debbie A Kennedy; James G Hoehn; Salmon Ashruf; Adrian M Przybyla
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Report on a survey of program directors regarding selection factors in graduate medical education.

Authors:  N E Wagoner; G T Gray
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1979-06

6.  "Matchmaker-matchmaker"--the evolution of pediatric surgical training programs and the selection of candidates for pediatric surgical training through the first quarter-century of the American Pediatric Surgical Association.

Authors:  R A Amoury
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Factors used by physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training directors to select their residents.

Authors:  J A DeLisa; S S Jain; D I Campagnolo
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.159

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Determining the Most Important Factors Involved in Ranking Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants.

Authors:  Rishi Baweja; Matthew J Kraeutler; Mary K Mulcahey; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-11-09

2.  Applicant Ranking Criteria in Adult Reconstruction Fellowship: Your Interview Counts When Applying for Fellowship.

Authors:  Shyam A Patel; Jillian Glasser; Ellis M Berns; Caitlin C Barrett; Derek Jenkins; Valentin Antoci; Eric Cohen; John Froehlich
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.