Literature DB >> 19920515

A double-masked, placebo-controlled evaluation of timolol in a gel vehicle.

J Laurence1, D Holder, R Vogel, R L Gross, B G Haik, D W Karp, M M Koby, T J Zimmerman.   

Abstract

We evaluated a topical formulation of timolol in an anionic heteropolysaccharide gellan gum (Gelrite). Fifty-five white patients with ocular hypertension entered a double-masked, placebo-controlled, four-period, incomplete block crossover study. After washout of any ocular hypotensive medications, the intraocular pressure of both eyes of all patients was measured at 0 (09:00 h), 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h (diurnal baseline). Patients were then randomized to receive, at 2-week intervals, one drop of each of four of the six treatments in one eye (0.008% timolol gel, 0.1% timolol gel, placebo gel, 0.008% timolol solution, 0.1% timolol solution, and placebo solution). Fellow eyes received the appropriate placebo. As measured by least-squares means, adjusted for the unmedicated baseline diurnal values, there was a clear dose-response, with the 0.1% treatments being more effective ocular hypotensive agents than the 0.008% treatments, which in turn were more effective than the placebo treatments. Within each concentration at several observation points, the gel formulation elicited a 1-2-mm Hg greater efficacy than the solution. Gel-treated subjects had a greater incidence of blurred vision. We conclude that formulation of timolol with a gel may increase efficacy, and thus duration of action. This may possibly allow use of a lower concentration of timolol or a reduced frequency of instillation. Further evaluation in chronic dosing studies is justified.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 19920515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients.

Authors:  D L Easty; G Nemeth-Wasmer; J-P Vounatsos; B Girard; N Besnainou; P Pouliquen; L Delval; J-F Rouland
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Plasma timolol concentrations of timolol maleate: timolol gel-forming solution (TIMOPTIC-XE) once daily versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution twice daily.

Authors:  A H Shedden; J Laurence; A Barrish; T V Olah
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 3.  Timolol 0.1% in Glaucomatous Patients: Efficacy, Tolerance, and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Letizia Negri; Antonio Ferreras; Michele Iester
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Advantages of Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Tafluprost/Timolol Combination Over Fixed-Dose Latanoprost/Timolol Combination.

Authors:  Masahiro Fuwa; Kenji Ueda; Takahiro Akaishi; Naoko Yamashita; Tomoko Kirihara; Atsushi Shimazaki; Hidetoshi Mano; Kouichi Kawazu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of preservative removal from fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol on intraocular pressure lowering: a potential timolol dose-response phenomenon.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Marina Bejanian
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.