PURPOSE: Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway has been reported to induce resistance to (chemo)radiation in cancers, such as head and neck cancer, whereas EGFR-targeted agents in combination with (chemo)radiation seem to improve treatment efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine the relation between proteins involved in the EGFR pathway and response to (chemo)radiation and survival in a large, well-documented series of cervical cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Pretreatment tissue samples of 375 consecutive International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians stage Ib to IVa cervical cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiation between January 1980 and December 2006 were collected. Clinicopathologic and follow-up data were prospectively obtained during standard treatment and follow-up. Protein expression of EGFR, phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR), PTEN, phosphorylated AKT, and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK) was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. RESULTS: EGFR staining was present in 35.3%, pEGFR in 19.7%, PTEN in 34.1%, phosphorylated AKT in 4.1%, and pERK in 29.2% of tumors. pEGFR staining was related to PTEN (P = 0.001) and pERK staining (P = 0.004). EGFR staining was inversely related to PTEN (P = 0.011). In multivariate analysis, membranous staining of EGFR [hazard ratio (HR), 1.84; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.20-2.82; P = 0.005] and cytoplasmic staining of pEGFR (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.11-2.66; P = 0.016) were independent predictors of poor response to (chemo)radiation. Membranous EGFR staining also was an independent prognostic factor for poor disease-specific survival (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.17; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: EGFR and pEGFR immunostainings are frequently observed and independently associated with poor response to therapy and disease-specific survival in cervical cancer patients primarily treated by (chemo)radiation. Our data present the EGFR pathway as a promising therapeutic target in already ongoing clinical trials.
PURPOSE: Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway has been reported to induce resistance to (chemo)radiation in cancers, such as head and neck cancer, whereas EGFR-targeted agents in combination with (chemo)radiation seem to improve treatment efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine the relation between proteins involved in the EGFR pathway and response to (chemo)radiation and survival in a large, well-documented series of cervical cancerpatients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Pretreatment tissue samples of 375 consecutive International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians stage Ib to IVa cervical cancerpatients treated with (chemo)radiation between January 1980 and December 2006 were collected. Clinicopathologic and follow-up data were prospectively obtained during standard treatment and follow-up. Protein expression of EGFR, phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR), PTEN, phosphorylated AKT, and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK) was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. RESULTS:EGFR staining was present in 35.3%, pEGFR in 19.7%, PTEN in 34.1%, phosphorylated AKT in 4.1%, and pERK in 29.2% of tumors. pEGFR staining was related to PTEN (P = 0.001) and pERK staining (P = 0.004). EGFR staining was inversely related to PTEN (P = 0.011). In multivariate analysis, membranous staining of EGFR [hazard ratio (HR), 1.84; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.20-2.82; P = 0.005] and cytoplasmic staining of pEGFR (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.11-2.66; P = 0.016) were independent predictors of poor response to (chemo)radiation. Membranous EGFR staining also was an independent prognostic factor for poor disease-specific survival (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.17; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS:EGFR and pEGFR immunostainings are frequently observed and independently associated with poor response to therapy and disease-specific survival in cervical cancerpatients primarily treated by (chemo)radiation. Our data present the EGFR pathway as a promising therapeutic target in already ongoing clinical trials.
Authors: Alessandro D Santin; Michael W Sill; D Scott McMeekin; Mario M Leitao; Jubilee Brown; Gregory P Sutton; Linda Van Le; Patricia Griffin; Cecelia H Boardman Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Frank Roossink; Steven de Jong; G Bea A Wisman; Ate G J van der Zee; Ed Schuuring Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Milan Vosmik; Jan Laco; Igor Sirak; Martin Beranek; Eva Hovorkova; Hana Vosmikova; Monika Drastikova; Miroslav Hodek; Zdenek Zoul; Karel Odrazka; Jiri Petera Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2013-08-03 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Arjan Kol; Joyce M Lubbers; Anouk L J Terwindt; Hagma H Workel; Annechien Plat; G Bea A Wisman; Joost Bart; Hans W Nijman; Marco De Bruyn Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2021-06-12 Impact factor: 8.110