Literature DB >> 19919888

Utility of the Pentax-AWS without interruption of chest compression: comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope with the Pentax-AWS in manikin model.

Sang Kuk Han1, Dong Hyuk Shin, Pil Cho Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency airway management in suboptimal conditions can result in difficulties in tracheal intubation. The video laryngoscope (Pentax-AWS) has potential advantages during difficult tracheal intubations. According to the 2005 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), all rescuers should minimize interruption of chest compressions. Our hypothesis is that tracheal intubation using the Pentax-AWS is possible without interruption of chest compressions. We tested this using tracheal intubation performed by less experienced medical personnel in a manikin model.
METHODS: Thirty-two less experienced (<10 tracheal intubations) medical interns performed intubation using the Pentax-AWS and the Macintosh laryngoscope in an ALS simulator (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway) in each of three scenarios. The three scenarios were: (1) normal airway without chest compression, (2) normal airway with continuous chest compression, and (3) difficult airway with continuous chest compression. The success rate, time required to complete tracheal intubation and to visualize vocal cords, POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score, dental compression and the ease of intubation were recorded.
RESULTS: All participants performed successful intubation with the Pentax-AWS in the three scenarios. In the two continuous chest compression scenarios (scenarios 2 and 3), the success rate was significantly higher with the Pentax-AWS than with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
CONCLUSIONS: The Pentax-AWS was an effective tool for endotracheal intubation during chest compression performed by less experienced medical personnel in a manikin model simulating cardiac arrest, both under conditions of normal and difficult airways. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19919888     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  8 in total

1.  Comparisons of the Pentax-AWS, Glidescope, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Intubation Performance during Mechanical Chest Compressions in Left Lateral Tilt: A Randomized Simulation Study of Maternal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  Sanghyun Lee; Wonhee Kim; Hyunggoo Kang; Jaehoon Oh; Tae Ho Lim; Yoonjae Lee; Changsun Kim; Jun Hwi Cho
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Cardiac arrest is a predictor of difficult tracheal intubation independent of operator experience in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Nita Khandelwal; Richard E Galgon; Marwan Ali; Aaron M Joffe
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  A comparison of the force applied on oral structures during intubation attempts between the Pentax-AWS airwayscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope: a high-fidelity simulator-based study.

Authors:  Tadahiro Goto; Yasuaki Koyama; Takashiro Kondo; Yusuke Tsugawa; Kohei Hasegawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Can the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians?: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.

Authors:  Andrzej Kurowski; Lukasz Szarpak; Zenon Truszewski; Lukasz Czyzewski
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Comparison of VividTrac, King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and difficult airways during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation among novices.

Authors:  Dóra Keresztes; Ákos Mérei; Martin Rozanovic; Edina Nagy; Zoltán Kovács-Ábrahám; János Oláh; Péter Maróti; Szilárd Rendeki; Bálint Nagy; Gábor Woth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of the utility of the Pentax Airway Scope (AWS) with that of the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope during chest compression: is the AWS an easy-to-use device for a novice?

Authors:  Atsushi Kotera; Hiroki Irie; Shinsuke Iwashita; Junichi Taniguchi; Shunji Kasaoka; Yoshihiro Kinoshita
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2014-04-23

7.  Endotracheal intubation using the Macintosh laryngoscope or KingVision video laryngoscope during uninterrupted chest compression.

Authors:  Ewelina Gaszynska; Tomasz Gaszynski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Comparison of the Pentax Airwayscope, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope, and Macintosh Laryngoscope During Chest Compression According to Bed Height.

Authors:  Wonhee Kim; Yoonje Lee; Changsun Kim; Tae Ho Lim; Jaehoon Oh; Hyunggoo Kang; Sanghyun Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.