BACKGROUND: In limited institution phase 2 studies, thalidomide and temozolomide has yielded response rates (RRs) up to 32% for advanced melanoma, leading to the use of this combination as "standard" by some. We conducted a multicenter phase 2 trial to better define the clinical efficacy of thalidomide and temozolomide and the immune modulatory effects of thalidomide, when combined with temozolomide, in patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: Patients must have had stage IV cutaneous melanoma, no active brain metastases, Zubrod PS 0-1, up to 1 prior systemic therapy excluding thalidomide, temozolomide, or dacarbazine, adequate organ function, and given informed consent. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), RR, toxicities, and assessment of relationships between biomarkers and clinical outcomes. Patients received thalidomide (200 mg/d escalated to 400 mg/d for patients <70, or 100 mg/d escalated to 250 mg/d for patients > or =70) plus temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)/d x 6 weeks, and then 2 weeks rest). RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were enrolled; 2 refused treatment. The 6-month PFS was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%-23%), the 1-year OS was 35% (95% CI, 24%-47%), and the RR was 13% (95% CI, 5%-25%), all partial. One treatment-related death occurred from myocardial infarction; 3 other grade 4 events occurred, including pulmonary embolism, neutropenia, and central nervous system (CNS) ischemia. There was no significant correlation between biomarkers and PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: This combination of thalidomide and temozolomide does not appear to have a clinical benefit that exceeds dacarbazine alone. We would not recommend it further for phase 3 trials or for standard community use.
BACKGROUND: In limited institution phase 2 studies, thalidomide and temozolomide has yielded response rates (RRs) up to 32% for advanced melanoma, leading to the use of this combination as "standard" by some. We conducted a multicenter phase 2 trial to better define the clinical efficacy of thalidomide and temozolomide and the immune modulatory effects of thalidomide, when combined with temozolomide, in patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS:Patients must have had stage IV cutaneous melanoma, no active brain metastases, Zubrod PS 0-1, up to 1 prior systemic therapy excluding thalidomide, temozolomide, or dacarbazine, adequate organ function, and given informed consent. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), RR, toxicities, and assessment of relationships between biomarkers and clinical outcomes. Patients received thalidomide (200 mg/d escalated to 400 mg/d for patients <70, or 100 mg/d escalated to 250 mg/d for patients > or =70) plus temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)/d x 6 weeks, and then 2 weeks rest). RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were enrolled; 2 refused treatment. The 6-month PFS was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%-23%), the 1-year OS was 35% (95% CI, 24%-47%), and the RR was 13% (95% CI, 5%-25%), all partial. One treatment-related death occurred from myocardial infarction; 3 other grade 4 events occurred, including pulmonary embolism, neutropenia, and central nervous system (CNS) ischemia. There was no significant correlation between biomarkers and PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: This combination of thalidomide and temozolomide does not appear to have a clinical benefit that exceeds dacarbazine alone. We would not recommend it further for phase 3 trials or for standard community use.
Authors: M R Middleton; J J Grob; N Aaronson; G Fierlbeck; W Tilgen; S Seiter; M Gore; S Aamdal; J Cebon; A Coates; B Dreno; M Henz; D Schadendorf; A Kapp; J Weiss; U Fraass; P Statkevich; M Muller; N Thatcher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wen-Jen Hwu; Susan E Krown; Katherine S Panageas; Jennifer H Menell; Paul B Chapman; Philip O Livingston; Linda J Williams; Carolyn J Quinn; Alan N Houghton Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Verbon; N P Juffermans; P Speelman; S J van Deventer; I J ten Berge; H J Guchelaar; T van der Poll Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M B Atkins; M T Lotze; J P Dutcher; R I Fisher; G Weiss; K Margolin; J Abrams; M Sznol; D Parkinson; M Hawkins; C Paradise; L Kunkel; S A Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W F Ng; P J Duggan; F Ponchel; G Matarese; G Lombardi; A D Edwards; J D Isaacs; R I Lechler Journal: Blood Date: 2001-11-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Michael B Atkins; Jessie Hsu; Sandra Lee; Gary I Cohen; Lawrence E Flaherty; Jeffrey A Sosman; Vernon K Sondak; John M Kirkwood Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-11-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T Eisen; C Boshoff; I Mak; F Sapunar; M M Vaughan; L Pyle; S R Johnston; R Ahern; I E Smith; M E Gore Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Harshita Mishra; Pawan K Mishra; Adam Ekielski; Manu Jaggi; Zeenat Iqbal; Sushama Talegaonkar Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Christina K Speirs; Misun Hwang; Sungjune Kim; Weier Li; Sophia Chang; Vinod Varki; Lauren Mitchell; Stephen Schleicher; Bo Lu Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Steven N Reuland; Nathaniel B Goldstein; Katie A Partyka; David A Cooper; Mayumi Fujita; David A Norris; Yiqun G Shellman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 3.240