Literature DB >> 19918916

Selection in utero: a biological response to mass layoffs.

Ralph Catalano1, Claire E Margerison Zilko, Katherine B Saxton, Tim Bruckner.   

Abstract

Most research describing the biological response to unemployment appears appropriately motivated by clinical or public health concerns and focuses on death, disease, and medical care. We argue that expanding the work to include other outcomes could contribute to basic science. As an example, we use the response to mass layoffs to discriminate between two explanations of low ratios of male to female live births in stressed populations. One explanation asserts that ambient stressors reduce the ratio of males to females conceived. The other argues that the maternal stress response selects against males in utero. We show that selection in utero better explains the observed data. We conclude that human adaptation to the economic environment deserves scrutiny from a wider array of scientists than it now receives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19918916     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.21011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  14 in total

1.  Prenatal stress, gestational age and secondary sex ratio: the sex-specific effects of exposure to a natural disaster in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Florencia Torche; Karine Kleinhaus
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Impact of earthquakes on sex ratio at birth: Eastern Marmara earthquakes.

Authors:  Emek Doğer; Yiğit Cakıroğlu; Sule Yıldırım Köpük; Yasin Ceylan; Hayal Uzelli Simşek; Eray Calışkan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-06-01

3.  An exploration of secondary sex ratios among women diagnosed with anxiety disorders.

Authors:  M S Subbaraman; S J Goldman-Mellor; E S Anderson; K Z Lewinn; K B Saxton; M Shumway; R Catalano
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Selection against small males in utero: a test of the Wells hypothesis.

Authors:  R Catalano; J Goodman; C E Margerison-Zilko; K B Saxton; E Anderson; M Epstein
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Hormonal evidence supports the theory of selection in utero.

Authors:  R A Catalano; K B Saxton; T A Bruckner; M Pearl; E Anderson; S Goldman-Mellor; C Margerison-Zilko; M Subbaraman; R J Currier; M Kharrazi
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.937

6.  Very low birthweight: dysregulated gestation versus evolutionary adaptation.

Authors:  Ralph Catalano; Deborah Karasek; Alison Gemmill; April Falconi; Julia Goodman; Aristotle Magganas; Terry Hartig
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Economic contraction and maternal health behaviors during pregnancy in a national sample of U.S. women.

Authors:  Claire Margerison-Zilko
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Economic downturns and male cesarean deliveries: a time-series test of the economic stress hypothesis.

Authors:  Tim A Bruckner; Yvonne W Cheng; Amrita Singh; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Natural selection in utero induced by mass layoffs: the hCG evidence.

Authors:  Ralph Catalano; Claire Margerison-Zilko; Sidra Goldman-Mellor; Michelle Pearl; Elizabeth Anderson; Katherine Saxton; Tim Bruckner; Meenakshi Subbaraman; Julia Goodman; Mollie Epstein; Robert Currier; Martin Kharrazi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 10.  Maternal Diabetes and Infant Sex Ratio.

Authors:  Samantha F Ehrlich
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.