Literature DB >> 19918588

Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up.

Irena Sailer1, Jacqueline Gottnerb, Sarah Kanelb, Christoph Han Franz Hammerle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test whether posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with zirconia frameworks exhibit similar survival rates and technical and biologic outcomes as those with metal frameworks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients in need of 76 FDPs replacing one to three posterior teeth (molars and premolars) were included in the study. The three- to five-unit FDPs were randomly assigned to 38 zirconia-ceramic and 38 metal-ceramic FDPs. At baseline, 6 months, and 1 to 3 years after cementation, the technical outcome of the reconstructions was examined using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The biologic outcome was analyzed at test (abutment) and control (contralateral) teeth by assessing: probing pocket depth (PPD), probing attachment level (PAL), plaque control record (PCR), bleeding on probing (BOP), and tooth vitality. Radiographs of the FDPs were made. Statistical analysis was performed by applying Kaplan-Meier, Pearson chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests.
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with 67 FDPs (36 zirconia-ceramic, 31 metal-ceramic) were examined after a mean observation period of 40.3 +/- 2.8 months. Six patients with 9 FDPs were lost to follow-up. The survival of both kinds of FDPs was 100%. No significant differences regarding the technical and biologic outcomes were found. Minor chipping of the veneering ceramic was found in 25% of the zirconia-ceramic and 19.4% of the metal-ceramic FDPs. Extended fracturing of the veneering ceramic occurred solely in zirconia-ceramic FDPs (C: 8.6%, D: 2.8% [USPHS criteria]). Few biologic complications were found. Both types of FDPs rendered the same mean values for the biologic parameters (mean PPD, PCR, and BOP for zirconia-ceramic FDPs = 2.4 +/- 0.3, 0.1 +/- 0.1, and 0.3 +/- 0.2, respectively; mean PPD, PCR, and BOP for metal-ceramic FDPs = 2.4 +/- 0.3, 0.1 +/- 0.1, and 0.3 +/- 0.2, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Zirconia-ceramic FDPs exhibited a similar survival rate to metal-ceramic FDPs at 3 years of function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19918588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  52 in total

1.  Chipping resistance of graded zirconia ceramics for dental crowns.

Authors:  Y Zhang; H Chai; J J-W Lee; B R Lawn
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Influence of cusp inclination and curvature on the in vitro failure and fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.

Authors:  Verena Preis; Thomas Dowerk; Michael Behr; Carola Kolbeck; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition.

Authors:  Elliot Abt; Alan B Carr; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-17

4.  On the interfacial fracture of porcelain/zirconia and graded zirconia dental structures.

Authors:  Herzl Chai; James J-W Lee; Adam J Mieleszko; Stephen J Chu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 5.  Performance of dental ceramics: challenges for improvements.

Authors:  E D Rekow; N R F A Silva; P G Coelho; Y Zhang; P Guess; V P Thompson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Clinical evaluation of zirconia-based all-ceramic single crowns: an up to 12-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shoko Miura; Shin Kasahara; Shinobu Yamauchi; Yayoi Okuyama; Akio Izumida; Jun Aida; Hiroshi Egusa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: a 4-year clinical follow-up study.

Authors:  Mustafa Barış Güncü; Umut Cakan; Guliz Aktas; Güliz Nigar Güncü; Şenay Canay
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  New Knowledge about Zirconium-Ceramic as a Structural Material in Fixed Prosthodontics.

Authors:  Davor Špehar; Marko Jakovac
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2015-06

9.  Five-year prospective clinical study of posterior three-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Roberto Sorrentino; Giorgio De Simone; Stefano Tetè; Simona Russo; Fernando Zarone
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Fatigue limit of monolithic Y-TZP three-unit-fixed dental prostheses: Effect of grinding at the gingival zone of the connector.

Authors:  Marina Amaral; Regina F Villefort; Renata Marques Melo; Gabriel K R Pereira; Yu Zhang; Luiz Felipe Valandro; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.