OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationships between history of falls and cholinergic vs dopaminergic denervation in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). BACKGROUND: There is a need to explore nondopaminergic mechanisms of gait control as the majority of motor impairments associated with falls in PD are resistant to dopaminergic treatment. Alterations in cholinergic neurotransmission in PD may be implicated because of evidence that gait control depends on cholinergic system-mediated higher-level cortical and subcortical processing, including pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) function. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 44 patients with PD (Hoehn & Yahr stages I-III) without dementia and 15 control subjects underwent a clinical assessment and [(11)C]methyl-4-piperidinyl propionate (PMP) acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and [(11)C]dihydrotetrabenazine (DTBZ) vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2) brain PET imaging. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (38.6%) reported a history of falls and 27 patients had no falls. Analysis of covariance of the cortical AChE hydrolysis rates demonstrated reduced cortical AChE in the PD fallers group (-12.3%) followed by the PD nonfallers (-6.6%) compared to control subjects (F = 7.22, p = 0.0004). Thalamic AChE activity was lower only in the PD fallers group (-11.8%; F = 4.36, p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in nigrostriatal dopaminergic activity between PD fallers and nonfallers. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation, cholinergic hypofunction is associated with fall status in Parkinson disease (PD). Thalamic AChE activity in part represents cholinergic output of the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN), a key node for gait control. Our results are consistent with other data indicating that PPN degeneration is a major factor leading to impaired postural control and gait dysfunction in PD.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationships between history of falls and cholinergic vs dopaminergic denervation in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). BACKGROUND: There is a need to explore nondopaminergic mechanisms of gait control as the majority of motor impairments associated with falls in PD are resistant to dopaminergic treatment. Alterations in cholinergic neurotransmission in PD may be implicated because of evidence that gait control depends on cholinergic system-mediated higher-level cortical and subcortical processing, including pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) function. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 44 patients with PD (Hoehn & Yahr stages I-III) without dementia and 15 control subjects underwent a clinical assessment and [(11)C]methyl-4-piperidinyl propionate (PMP) acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and [(11)C]dihydrotetrabenazine (DTBZ) vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2) brain PET imaging. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (38.6%) reported a history of falls and 27 patients had no falls. Analysis of covariance of the cortical AChE hydrolysis rates demonstrated reduced cortical AChE in the PD fallers group (-12.3%) followed by the PD nonfallers (-6.6%) compared to control subjects (F = 7.22, p = 0.0004). Thalamic AChE activity was lower only in the PD fallers group (-11.8%; F = 4.36, p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in nigrostriatal dopaminergic activity between PD fallers and nonfallers. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation, cholinergic hypofunction is associated with fall status in Parkinson disease (PD). Thalamic AChE activity in part represents cholinergic output of the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN), a key node for gait control. Our results are consistent with other data indicating that PPN degeneration is a major factor leading to impaired postural control and gait dysfunction in PD.
Authors: Robert D Nebes; Bruce G Pollock; Edythe M Halligan; Margaret A Kirshner; Patricia R Houck Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: J-P Taylor; E N Rowan; D Lett; J T O'Brien; I G McKeith; D J Burn Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: R A Hauser; J Friedlander; T A Zesiewicz; C H Adler; L C Seeberger; C F O'Brien; E S Molho; S A Factor Journal: Clin Neuropharmacol Date: 2000 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.592
Authors: N I Bohnen; D I Kaufer; R Hendrickson; L S Ivanco; B J Lopresti; G M Constantine; Ch A Mathis; J G Davis; R Y Moore; S T Dekosky Journal: J Neurol Date: 2005-09-02 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Martijn L T M Müller; Nicolaas I Bohnen; Vikas Kotagal; Peter J H Scott; Robert A Koeppe; Kirk A Frey; Roger L Albin Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Ajeesh Koshy Cherian; Aaron Kucinski; Ryan Wu; Inge E M de Jong; Martin Sarter Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Brian Lau; Marie-Laure Welter; Hayat Belaid; Sara Fernandez Vidal; Eric Bardinet; David Grabli; Carine Karachi Journal: Brain Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 13.501