Literature DB >> 19917383

Performance of posttransplant Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and delta-MELD scores on short-term outcome after living donor liver transplantation.

J D Kim1, J Y Choi, J H Kwon, J W Jang, S H Bae, S K Yoon, Y K You, D G Kim.   

Abstract

The performance of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and delta-MELD scores in predicting posttransplant survival has been variable and the results are conflicting, suggesting that posttransplantational factors are more important than pre- or peritransplantational factors in outcomes following liver transplantation (OLT). We assessed the value of posttransplant MELD and delta-MELD scores to predict short-term (90-day) posttransplant survival. We evaluated 279 consecutive patients undergoing living donor OLTs. The MELD scores were calculated serially from pretransplantation as well as 3, 7, and 14 days after transplantation. Twenty-seven (9.7%) among 279 patients died within 90 days after transplantation. Pretransplant MELD score was not associated with short-term posttransplant mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve in predicting 90-day mortality was 0.637 for posttransplant 3-day MELD, 0.746 for posttransplant 7-day MELD, and 0.859 for posttransplant 14-day MELD score (P = .047, <.001, and <.001, respectively); AUROC was 0.582, 0.646, and 0.784 for 3-day, 7-day, and 14-day delta-MELD scores (P = .235, .034, <.001, respectively). Upon multivariate analysis, posttransplant 14-day MELD (> or =20 vs <20), and 14-day delta-MELD scores (> or =-3 vs <-3) were independent short-term prognostic factors with risk ratios of 18.875 (95% confidential interval [CI]: 4.625-77.028, P < .001) and 13.577 (95% CI: 2.641-69.791, P = .002), respectively. In conclusion, determination of posttransplant 14-day MELD and 14-day delta-MELD scores may afford suitable short-term prognostic predictors for patients following living donor OLT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19917383     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

1.  MELD-good for many, not as good for others … at least for now.

Authors:  Thomas Schiano
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Model for end-stage liver disease score predicts complications after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Thomas Røjkjær Daugaard; Andreas Arendtsen Rostved; Nicolai Aagaard Schultz; Jens Hillingsø; Paul Suno Krohn; Allan Rasmussen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Can Preoperative Frailty Accurately Predict Morbidity and Mortality Following Liver Surgery?

Authors:  Hui-Xian Li; Fu-Shan Xue; Gui-Zhen Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Reply to Li et al. "Can Preoperative Frailty Accurately Predict Morbidity and Mortality Following Liver Surgery?"

Authors:  Faiz Gani; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Sluggish decline in a post-transplant model for end-stage liver disease score is a predictor of mortality in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Won Jung Hwang; Joon Pyo Jeon; Seung Hee Kang; Hyun Sik Chung; Ji Yong Kim; Chul Soo Park
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-09-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.