Literature DB >> 19915983

Impact of pattern of admission on ICH outcomes.

Neeraj Sunderrajan Naval1, J Ricardo Carhuapoma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with the highest mortality of all strokes. Admission to a Neurosciences Critical Care Unit (NCCU) compared to a general ICU has been associated with reduced mortality following ICH. Such association has led to several hospitals transferring ICH patients to Neuro-ICUs in tertiary care centers. However, delays in optimizing ICH management prior to and during transfer can lead to deleterious consequences. To compare functional outcomes in ICH patients admitted to our NCCU directly from the ED versus inter-hospital transfer admissions.
METHODS: Records of consecutive spontaneous supratentorial ICH patients admitted to The Johns Hopkins Hospital NCCU were reviewed. Patients with ICH related to trauma or underlying lesions (brain tumors, aneurysms, AVM) were excluded. We compared outcomes at discharge in patients admitted directly from the ED and inter-hospital transfers (IHT) using dichotomized modified Rankin Scale (Good outcomes: mRS 0-3). Other factors potentially impacting outcomes such as age, ICH volume, IVH volume, and admission GCS were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: 125 patients were included in the analysis (ED 61.6%; IHT 38.4%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean age (ED 63.4 +/- 13.1; IHT 63.4 +/- 15.2, P = 0.96), ICH volume (ED 31.4 +/- 37.6; IHT 33.5 +/- 42.8, P = 0.76), IVH volume (ED 6.0 +/- 11.2; IHT 8.0 +/- 14.5, P = 0.38), and GCS (ED 11.3 +/- 3.7, IHT 10.9 +/- 3.5; P = 0.44). 57.2% ED patients had good outcomes (mRS 0-3) at discharge compared to 37.5% IHT. This difference was statistically significant following univariate (P = 0.034, 95% CI .2151-.9416) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.028, 95% CI .1338-.8896). Odds (adjusted) of ED admissions having good outcomes was three times higher than IHT. Neurological deterioration (GCS decline 2 or more) was more common in IHT and, in subgroup analysis of IHT patients with warfarin-associated ICH, hematoma enlargement was significantly more likely than in direct ED admissions.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICH brought directly to our ED had significantly better outcomes than IHT; we hypothesize this may be caused by delays in optimizing management prior to arrival at the facility with a dedicated Neuro-ICU. Nevertheless, other equally plausible hypotheses need to be prospectively tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19915983     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-009-9302-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  21 in total

1.  Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical intensive care unit is associated with reduced mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  M N Diringer; D F Edwards
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Volume of ventricular blood is an important determinant of outcome in supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  S Tuhrim; D R Horowitz; M Sacher; J H Godbold
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  J C Hemphill; D C Bonovich; L Besmertis; G T Manley; S C Johnston
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Early presentation of hemispheric intracerebral hemorrhage: prediction of outcome and guidelines for treatment allocation.

Authors:  D R Lisk; W Pasteur; H Rhoades; R D Putnam; J C Grotta
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Neurosurgical emergency transfers to academic centers in Cook County: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Richard W Byrne; Bradley T Bagan; Konstantin V Slavin; Daniel Curry; Tyler R Koski; Thomas C Origitano
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Acute seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage: a factor in progressive midline shift and outcome.

Authors:  P M Vespa; K O'Phelan; M Shah; J Mirabelli; S Starkman; C Kidwell; J Saver; M R Nuwer; J G Frazee; D A McArthur; N A Martin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Intracerebral haemorrhage.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; A David Mendelow; Daniel F Hanley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Intracerebral hemorrhage more than twice as common as subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  J P Broderick; T Brott; T Tomsick; R Miller; G Huster
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial.

Authors:  Craig S Anderson; Yining Huang; Ji Guang Wang; Hisatomi Arima; Bruce Neal; Bin Peng; Emma Heeley; Christian Skulina; Mark W Parsons; Jong Sung Kim; Qing Ling Tao; Yue Chun Li; Jian Dong Jiang; Li Wen Tai; Jin Li Zhang; En Xu; Yan Cheng; Stephane Heritier; Lewis B Morgenstern; John Chalmers
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 44.182

10.  Hydrocephalus: a previously unrecognized predictor of poor outcome from supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  M N Diringer; D F Edwards; A R Zazulia
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of interhospital transfer on complications and outcome after intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ashley R Catalano; H R Winn; Errol Gordon; Jennifer A Frontera
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  The excess cost of interisland transfer of intracerebral hemorrhage patients.

Authors:  Kazuma Nakagawa; Alexandra Galati; Deborah Taira Juarez
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Geographic access to US Neurocritical Care Units registered with the Neurocritical Care Society.

Authors:  Michael J Ward; Lori A Shutter; Charles C Branas; Opeolu Adeoye; Karen C Albright; Brendan G Carr
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  The effect of secular trends and specialist neurocritical care on mortality for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage, myasthenia gravis and Guillain-Barré syndrome admitted to critical care : an analysis of the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) national United Kingdom database.

Authors:  Maxwell S Damian; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Robin Howard; Tony Bellotti; David Harrison; Kathryn Griggs; Kathryn Rowan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Which factors influence decisions to transfer and treat patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage and which are associated with prognosis? A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kamran A Abid; Andy Vail; Hiren C Patel; Andrew T King; Pippa J Tyrrell; Adrian R Parry-Jones
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Transferring Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Does Not Increase In-Hospital Mortality.

Authors:  Farhaan Vahidy; Claude Nguyen; Karen C Albright; Amelia K Boehme; Osman Mir; Kara A Sands; Sean I Savitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.