BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with the highest mortality of all strokes. Admission to a Neurosciences Critical Care Unit (NCCU) compared to a general ICU has been associated with reduced mortality following ICH. Such association has led to several hospitals transferring ICH patients to Neuro-ICUs in tertiary care centers. However, delays in optimizing ICH management prior to and during transfer can lead to deleterious consequences. To compare functional outcomes in ICH patients admitted to our NCCU directly from the ED versus inter-hospital transfer admissions. METHODS: Records of consecutive spontaneous supratentorial ICH patients admitted to The Johns Hopkins Hospital NCCU were reviewed. Patients with ICH related to trauma or underlying lesions (brain tumors, aneurysms, AVM) were excluded. We compared outcomes at discharge in patients admitted directly from the ED and inter-hospital transfers (IHT) using dichotomized modified Rankin Scale (Good outcomes: mRS 0-3). Other factors potentially impacting outcomes such as age, ICH volume, IVH volume, and admission GCS were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: 125 patients were included in the analysis (ED 61.6%; IHT 38.4%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean age (ED 63.4 +/- 13.1; IHT 63.4 +/- 15.2, P = 0.96), ICH volume (ED 31.4 +/- 37.6; IHT 33.5 +/- 42.8, P = 0.76), IVH volume (ED 6.0 +/- 11.2; IHT 8.0 +/- 14.5, P = 0.38), and GCS (ED 11.3 +/- 3.7, IHT 10.9 +/- 3.5; P = 0.44). 57.2% ED patients had good outcomes (mRS 0-3) at discharge compared to 37.5% IHT. This difference was statistically significant following univariate (P = 0.034, 95% CI .2151-.9416) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.028, 95% CI .1338-.8896). Odds (adjusted) of ED admissions having good outcomes was three times higher than IHT. Neurological deterioration (GCS decline 2 or more) was more common in IHT and, in subgroup analysis of IHT patients with warfarin-associated ICH, hematoma enlargement was significantly more likely than in direct ED admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICH brought directly to our ED had significantly better outcomes than IHT; we hypothesize this may be caused by delays in optimizing management prior to arrival at the facility with a dedicated Neuro-ICU. Nevertheless, other equally plausible hypotheses need to be prospectively tested.
BACKGROUND:Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with the highest mortality of all strokes. Admission to a Neurosciences Critical Care Unit (NCCU) compared to a general ICU has been associated with reduced mortality following ICH. Such association has led to several hospitals transferring ICHpatients to Neuro-ICUs in tertiary care centers. However, delays in optimizing ICH management prior to and during transfer can lead to deleterious consequences. To compare functional outcomes in ICHpatients admitted to our NCCU directly from the ED versus inter-hospital transfer admissions. METHODS: Records of consecutive spontaneous supratentorial ICHpatients admitted to The Johns Hopkins Hospital NCCU were reviewed. Patients with ICH related to trauma or underlying lesions (brain tumors, aneurysms, AVM) were excluded. We compared outcomes at discharge in patients admitted directly from the ED and inter-hospital transfers (IHT) using dichotomized modified Rankin Scale (Good outcomes: mRS 0-3). Other factors potentially impacting outcomes such as age, ICH volume, IVH volume, and admission GCS were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: 125 patients were included in the analysis (ED 61.6%; IHT 38.4%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean age (ED 63.4 +/- 13.1; IHT 63.4 +/- 15.2, P = 0.96), ICH volume (ED 31.4 +/- 37.6; IHT 33.5 +/- 42.8, P = 0.76), IVH volume (ED 6.0 +/- 11.2; IHT 8.0 +/- 14.5, P = 0.38), and GCS (ED 11.3 +/- 3.7, IHT 10.9 +/- 3.5; P = 0.44). 57.2% ED patients had good outcomes (mRS 0-3) at discharge compared to 37.5% IHT. This difference was statistically significant following univariate (P = 0.034, 95% CI .2151-.9416) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.028, 95% CI .1338-.8896). Odds (adjusted) of ED admissions having good outcomes was three times higher than IHT. Neurological deterioration (GCS decline 2 or more) was more common in IHT and, in subgroup analysis of IHT patients with warfarin-associated ICH, hematoma enlargement was significantly more likely than in direct ED admissions. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with ICH brought directly to our ED had significantly better outcomes than IHT; we hypothesize this may be caused by delays in optimizing management prior to arrival at the facility with a dedicated Neuro-ICU. Nevertheless, other equally plausible hypotheses need to be prospectively tested.
Authors: Richard W Byrne; Bradley T Bagan; Konstantin V Slavin; Daniel Curry; Tyler R Koski; Thomas C Origitano Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: P M Vespa; K O'Phelan; M Shah; J Mirabelli; S Starkman; C Kidwell; J Saver; M R Nuwer; J G Frazee; D A McArthur; N A Martin Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-05-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Craig S Anderson; Yining Huang; Ji Guang Wang; Hisatomi Arima; Bruce Neal; Bin Peng; Emma Heeley; Christian Skulina; Mark W Parsons; Jong Sung Kim; Qing Ling Tao; Yue Chun Li; Jian Dong Jiang; Li Wen Tai; Jin Li Zhang; En Xu; Yan Cheng; Stephane Heritier; Lewis B Morgenstern; John Chalmers Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-04-07 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Michael J Ward; Lori A Shutter; Charles C Branas; Opeolu Adeoye; Karen C Albright; Brendan G Carr Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Maxwell S Damian; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Robin Howard; Tony Bellotti; David Harrison; Kathryn Griggs; Kathryn Rowan Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Kamran A Abid; Andy Vail; Hiren C Patel; Andrew T King; Pippa J Tyrrell; Adrian R Parry-Jones Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Farhaan Vahidy; Claude Nguyen; Karen C Albright; Amelia K Boehme; Osman Mir; Kara A Sands; Sean I Savitz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 3.240