Literature DB >> 19915714

Extent of Fentanyl Accumulation Following Multiple Doses of Fentanyl Buccal Tablet 400 microg in Healthy Japanese Volunteers.

Mona Darwish, Kenneth Tempero, John G Jiang, Philip G Simonson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics, including extent of accumulation, and safety and tolerability of fentanyl following multiple doses of fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) in healthy Japanese volunteers.
METHODS: Healthy Japanese adults received 10 successive doses of open-label FBT 400 microg at 6-hour intervals. Naltrexone was given to minimize the opioid effects of fentanyl. FBT was placed above a molar tooth between the gum and cheek. Peak serum fentanyl concentration (C(max)), time to C(max) (t(max)), and area under the serum fentanyl concentration-time curve from 0 to 6 hours (AUC(0-6)) were summarized using descriptive statistics. Accumulation ratio was calculated as C(max) for dose 10/C(max) for dose 1, and was calculated similarly for AUC(0-6).
RESULTS: Fourteen volunteers (mean age 33 years) were enrolled, and 13 completed the study. After doses 1 and 10, respectively, mean (SD) C(max) was 1.70 (0.49) ng/mL and 1.97 (0.42) ng/mL, AUC(0-6) was 4.46 (1.14) ng.h/mL and 6.81 (0.90) ng.h/mL, and median (range) t(max) was 50 (30-110) minutes and 30 (15-120) minutes. Following 10 successive doses, systemic exposure (AUC(0-6)) was 55% higher than after dose 1, and C(max) was 23% higher. Steady state was achieved within 3 days of dosing at 6-hour intervals, i.e., prior to dose 10. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were somnolence (N = 9), decreased oxygen saturation (N = 4), headache (N = 3), application-site pain (N = 8), application-site erythema (N = 6), and application-site reaction (N = 5). All AEs were mild or moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: Following administration of FBT at 6-hour intervals to healthy Japanese volunteers, at steady state, fentanyl exposure was higher by 55% (AUC(0-6)) and 23% (C(max)) than after a single dose of FBT. Adverse events were mild or moderate.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19915714      PMCID: PMC2773539          DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-5174.2008.00008.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Drug Inf        ISSN: 1753-5174


Introduction

Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT; FENTORA®, Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA, USA) is approved for marketing by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer who are already receiving and who are tolerant to around-the-clock opioid therapy for their underlying persistent cancer pain [1-3]. FBT employs OraVescent® technology to enhance the rate and extent of absorption of fentanyl across the buccal mucosa [4]. The pharmacokinetic profile of FBT has been examined in several studies, primarily involving healthy white volunteers [5-9]. The current study was conducted to support the submission of a new drug application for FBT in Japan. The objectives of this study were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl, including the extent of accumulation, and to assess the safety and tolerability of fentanyl following multiple doses of FBT 400 µg in healthy Japanese volunteers.

Methods

Study Population

Healthy, adult Japanese volunteers residing in the United States who were aged 20 to 55 years, had lived fewer than 10 years outside of Japan, and had a body mass index of 17.6 to 29 kg/m2were eligible for this study. Volunteers agreed to refrain from using tobacco products throughout the study. Women of childbearing potential were required to practice abstinence or use a reliable form of contraception for 14 days prior to screening and throughout the study. Exclusion criteria included a history or presence of clinically significant concomitant disease, including clinically significant laboratory, electrocardiogram (ECG), or physical examination results at screening; history or presence of alcoholism or drug abuse; hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to fentanyl or related compounds; history of frequent or widespread bilateral canker sores or current oral pathology; or participation in another clinical study within the previous 30 days. Volunteers were also excluded if they had smoked >10 cigarettes per day within 3 months, taken prescription medications within 14 days or over-the-counter medications within 7 days, or used drugs known to be strong inhibitors or strong inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes within 10 and 30 days, respectively, prior to administration of the first dose of study drug. In addition, women were excluded if they were pregnant or lactating.

Study Design

This study was conducted at a single center (Radiant Research, Honolulu, HI). The protocol was approved by the Quorum Review, Inc., Institutional Review Board. All volunteers provided written informed consent. Volunteers received 10 successive single doses of open-label FBT 400 µg, administered at 6-hour intervals. Because healthy volunteers are not opioid tolerant, the volunteers in this study also received oral naltrexone 50 mg (Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pomona, NY) 15 hours and 3 hours before the first FBT dose, and every 12 hours after the first dose (for a total of 7 doses) to minimize the opioid receptor–mediated effects of fentanyl. Coadministration of naltrexone with fentanyl would not be expected to affect the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl because fentanyl is a substrate of CYP3A4 [10], and naltrexone is not an inhibitor or inducer of CYP3A4 [11]. Volunteers self-administered FBT by placing a single tablet buccally above a molar tooth and allowing it to disintegrate for 10 minutes. If any portion of the tablet remained after 10 minutes, the volunteer gently massaged the adjacent cheek area for 5 minutes, at which time study center personnel visually inspected the volunteer's mouth to note whether tablet particles were present. (It should be noted that massage is no longer recommended in the prescribing information [2].) Any remaining material was allowed to disintegrate. Volunteers refrained from drinking any liquids until complete disappearance of the tablet residue, and remained seated for 2 hours following administration of each of the first 3 FBT doses.

Dwell Time Assessment

Buccal dwell time, the time elapsed between placement of FBT and complete disappearance of tablet residue, was verified visually and recorded by study personnel.

Sample Collection

Venous blood samples (5 mL each) were collected for determination of fentanyl serum concentrations. Collection times were just before placement of each dose and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, and 110 minutes, and 2, 4, and 6 hours after placement of dose 1. Samples were also collected 15, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, and 110 minutes, and 2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 18, 24, and 32 hours after placement of dose 10. Blood samples were kept at room temperature until they fully clotted. They were then centrifuged at 2,500 revolutions per minute at 4°C for 15 minutes to separate the serum, which was stored in polypropylene containers at or below −20°C until assayed.

Analytical Methods

Fentanyl concentrations were quantitated in serum samples using a validated assay for high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS; PE Sciex API 3,000, API 365, and API III Plus with an ESI interface). The analyte and internal standard (d5-fentanyl) were extracted from serum under basic conditions. Serum extracts were evaporated to dryness and reconstituted before injection onto the HPLC-MS/MS. Detection was accomplished using multiple-reaction monitoring in positive ion mode. The linear range for the assay was 10 to 5,000 pg/mL (0.01–5.0 ng/mL). The lower limit of quantitation was set at 50 pg/mL (0.05 ng/mL), and fentanyl concentrations below this level were given a value of 0.0 in the computation of mean concentration values. For quality control samples, interbatch precision (% coefficient of variation) was ≤4.6% and accuracy ranged from 95.5% to 102.0%.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis

For doses 1 and 10, maximum serum fentanyl concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and area under the serum fentanyl concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 6 hours (AUC0–6) were determined. Additional pharmacokinetic parameters determined for dose 10 included minimum serum fentanyl concentration (Cmin), AUC from time 0 to last quantifiable serum concentration (AUC0–last), and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0–∞). Trough concentrations (Ctrough) were analyzed in blood samples obtained immediately preceding each dose. Cmax, Cmin, and tmax were obtained by inspection. AUC0–6was obtained by linear trapezoidal summation from time 0 to 6 hours post dose, and AUC0–last was obtained by linear trapezoidal summation from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration after the last dose. AUC0–∞ was obtained as AUC0–last + Clast/λz, where Clast is the last quantifiable serum fentanyl concentration and λz is the terminal elimination rate constant. The half-life (t½) could not be calculated after dose 1 because there were insufficient analysis time points, i.e., only up to 6 hours. The t½ and λz were determined from the terminal phase of the last dose administered. In addition, the accumulation ratio was calculated as the AUC0–6 ratio for dose 10 to dose 1 and as the Cmax ratio for dose 10 to dose 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from concentration-time data using noncompartmental methods with WinNonlin® Professional software Version 4.1 (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA).

Safety and Tolerability Assessments

Clinical laboratory tests, 12-lead ECG, and physical examinations including vital signs were performed at screening and at study completion or early termination. Serial vital signs were measured before and through 6 hours after the first tablet placement, and prior to all blood sampling times. Continuous pulse oximetry was conducted, though not recorded, for the first 4 hours post dose and whenever the volunteers attempted to sleep during the study in the clinic. In addition, the oral mucosa was examined by the investigator 1 hour after tablet placement; any abnormality or untoward or uncomfortable sensations in the mouth were recorded as adverse events (AEs). Other AEs observed by study personnel or reported by volunteers also were recorded.

Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the calculated pharmacokinetic parameters. Unless otherwise stated, statistical tests were 2-sided with an α level of 0.05. The accumulation ratio was calculated as AUC0–6 for dose 10/AUC0–6 for dose 1, and as Cmax for dose 10/Cmax for dose 1. To assess the attainment of steady state, analysis of variance (anova) was performed on the natural log of pre-dose concentrations for dose 8, 9, and 10, as well as the 6-hour post-dose concentration after the last dose. Both the pharmacokinetic population and safety population were defined as all volunteers who received FBT. It was planned that 14 subjects would be enrolled such that, after dropouts, 10 subjects would complete the study. The planned final sample size of 10 subjects was not based on a statistical power calculation.

Results

Fourteen healthy Japanese adults (7 men, 7 women) aged 20 to 50 years were enrolled in the study (Table 1) and were included in both the pharmacokinetic and safety populations. One volunteer was discontinued after the eighth FBT dose because of AEs; thus, 13 volunteers completed the study.
Table 1

Demographic variables

N = 14
Age, year (mean [SD])33 (8)
Sex, female (N [%])7 (50)
Weight, kg (mean [SD])57.0 (9.1)
Height, cm (mean [SD])163.9 (9.2)
Body mass index, kg/m2 (mean [SD])21.2 (2.1)

SD = standard deviation.

Demographic variables SD = standard deviation.

Pharmacokinetic Results

The serum fentanyl distribution/elimination pattern was triphasic after dose 10 (Figure 1). Pharmacokinetic parameters after dose 1 and dose 10 are presented in Table 2. Median tmax occurred 50 minutes after dose 1 and 30 minutes after dose 10. Mean Cmax and systemic exposure (AUC0–6) were higher after dose 10 than after dose 1. After dose 10, the AUC0–last and AUC0–∞ values were similar (Table 2). Accumulation of serum fentanyl from dose 1 to dose 10 was shown by the calculated accumulation ratios for AUC0–6 (1.55) and Cmax (1.23). The mean t½ after dose 10 was 10.29 hours (Table 2). Mean (SD) trough values after dose 7, 8, and 9 were 0.71 (0.17), 0.68 (0.15), and 0.58 (0.12) ng/mL, respectively, and the mean (SD) value at 6 hours after dose 10 was 0.62 (0.10) ng/mL. Steady state was achieved within 3 days of dosing at 6-hour intervals, i.e., prior to dose 10 (Table 3).
Figure 1

Mean (standard error of the mean) serum fentanyl concentrations after administration of 1 dose and 10 doses of fentanyl buccal tablet 400 µg at 6-hour intervals (inset shows the first 6 hours).

Table 2

Pharmacokinetic parameters following administration of 1 dose of fentanyl buccal tablet 400 µg and 10 doses at 6-hour intervals

Dose 1Dose 10
(N = 14)(N = 13)
ParameterMean (SD)Mean (SD)
Cmax (ng/mL)1.70 (0.49)1.97 (0.42)
tmax (min)*50 (30, 110)30 (15, 120)
AUC0–6 (ng·h/mL)4.46 (1.14)6.81 (0.90)
Accumulation ratio, CmaxNA1.23 (0.53)
Accumulation ratio, AUC0–6NA1.55 (0.35)
AUC0–∞(ng·h/mL)NA16.09 (2.26)
AUC0–last (ng·h/mL)NA14.41 (1.83)
Cmin (ng/mL)NA0.58 (0.11)
λz (1/h)NA0.07 (0.01)
t½ (h)NA10.29 (1.53)

tmax is presented as the median (range).

For multiple versus single dosing, calculated as Cmax dose 10/Cmax dose 1 and as AUC0–6 dose 10/AUC0–6 dose 1.

Cmax = maximum serum fentanyl concentration; tmax = time to Cmax; AUC0–6 = area under the serum fentanyl concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 6 hours; AUC0–∞ = AUC from time 0 to infinity; AUC0–last = AUC from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable serum fentanyl concentration; Cmin = minimum serum fentanyl concentration; NA = not applicable; λz = terminal elimination rate constant; t½ = elimination half-life.

Table 3

Statistical evaluation of steady state after buccal administration of fentanyl buccal tablet 400 µg every 6 hours for 10 doses

Steady state Pvalue*
Sample timeNLeast squares mean (ng/mL)Sample time effectvs. predose 9vs. predose 10vs. postdose 10
Predose 8140.68770.00070.32930.00020.0057
Predose 9130.65490.00290.0604
Predose 10130.55860.2162
Postdose 10130.5947

Equivalence across listed samples was assumed if P ≥ 0.05.

Sample taken 6 hours following dose 10.

Note:Pre-dose concentration analysis was performed with an anova model, ln(concentration) = subject + sample time, where subject was a random effect and sample time was a fixed effect.

Statistical evaluation of steady state after buccal administration of fentanyl buccal tablet 400 µg every 6 hours for 10 doses Equivalence across listed samples was assumed if P ≥ 0.05. Sample taken 6 hours following dose 10. Note:Pre-dose concentration analysis was performed with an anova model, ln(concentration) = subject + sample time, where subject was a random effect and sample time was a fixed effect. Pharmacokinetic parameters following administration of 1 dose of fentanyl buccal tablet 400 µg and 10 doses at 6-hour intervals tmax is presented as the median (range). For multiple versus single dosing, calculated as Cmax dose 10/Cmax dose 1 and as AUC0–6 dose 10/AUC0–6 dose 1. Cmax = maximum serum fentanyl concentration; tmax = time to Cmax; AUC0–6 = area under the serum fentanyl concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 6 hours; AUC0–∞ = AUC from time 0 to infinity; AUC0–last = AUC from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable serum fentanyl concentration; Cmin = minimum serum fentanyl concentration; NA = not applicable; λz = terminal elimination rate constant; t½ = elimination half-life. Mean (standard error of the mean) serum fentanyl concentrations after administration of 1 dose and 10 doses of fentanyl buccal tablet 400 µg at 6-hour intervals (inset shows the first 6 hours).

Buccal Dwell Time

The recorded dwell time of FBT in the buccal cavity ranged from 9 to 60 minutes.

Safety and Tolerability

As stated previously, naltrexone was administered to these healthy volunteers to minimize the opioid effects of fentanyl. Fourteen volunteers had at least 1 AE, all of which were mild or moderate. No serious AEs occurred during the study. One volunteer was discontinued from the study after administration of FBT dose 8 and naltrexone dose 6 because of nausea and vomiting considered by the investigator to have been related to study drug. The most frequently reported AEs (incidence ≥10% of volunteers) that were not related to the application site of FBT were somnolence (N = 9 [64.3%]), decreased oxygen saturation (N = 4 [28.6%]), headache (N = 3 [21.4%]), fatigue (N = 2 [14.3%]), nausea (N = 2 [14.3%]), and venipuncture-site pain (N = 2 [14.3%]). The 4 instances of decreased oxygen saturation, which were based on the clinical judgment of the investigator, were reported as mild and related to study drug, and all resolved with no action taken. The most frequently reported application-site AEs (incidence ≥10% of volunteers) were pain (N = 8 [57.1%]), erythema (N = 6 [42.9%]), and unspecified site reactions (N = 5 [35.7%]). In addition, there was 1 occurrence of each of the following application-site AEs: bleeding, irritation, ulcer, and vesicles. The incidence of changes in the oral mucosa increased in proportion to the number of doses administered. There were no clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory test results, vital sign values, ECG parameters, or physical examination findings during this study.

Discussion

The primary objectives of this study were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl, including its accumulation, and the safety and tolerability following administration of FBT 400 µg every 6 hours for a total of 10 doses. Accumulation of fentanyl was noted from doses 1 to 10, with systemic exposure (AUC0–6) 55% higher and Cmax 23% higher after the tenth dose compared with the first dose. Steady state was reached within 3 days of dosing at 6-hour intervals, i.e., prior to dose 10. Fentanyl was rapidly absorbed following buccal administration of FBT 400 µg, with a median tmax of approximately 50 minutes following a single dose and 30 minutes after multiple doses. Dwell time of FBT in the buccal mucosa varied from 9 to 60 minutes; however, it has been shown that the pharmacokinetic profile of fentanyl is not affected by the dwell time [12]. Fourteen volunteers had AEs, all of which were mild or moderate, with no serious AEs. The most common AEs not related to the application site of FBT were generally consistent with those previously reported in healthy volunteers who received FBT and naltrexone [5,6,8,13]. The 4 instances of decreased oxygen saturation were reported as mild and related to study drug, and all resolved with no action taken. The frequency of changes in the oral mucosa increased as the number of administered doses increased; therefore, patients should alternate dosing between the two sides of the mouth if they have mucosal irritation. Limitations of this study include the enrollment of healthy volunteers, who may not represent a patient population. In particular, safety and tolerability findings would not be expected to reflect those in patients because the healthy volunteers in this study were administered oral naltrexone to minimize the opioid effects of fentanyl. In conclusion, in healthy Japanese volunteers who received FBT 400 µg every 6 hours for 10 doses, fentanyl steady state was achieved prior to dose 10 (i.e., approximately 3 days of dosing at 6-hour intervals), and systemic exposure was 55% (AUC0–6) and 23% (Cmax) higher at steady state than after a single dose.
  11 in total

1.  Comparison of equivalent doses of fentanyl buccal tablets and arteriovenous differences in fentanyl pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Mona Darwish; Mary Kirby; Philmore Robertson; Edward Hellriegel; John G Jiang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of fentanyl effervescent buccal tablets in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Mona Darwish; Kenneth Tempero; Mary Kirby; Jeffrey Thompson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal tablet in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Mona Darwish; Mary Kirby; Philmore Robertson; Edward Hellriegel; John G Jiang
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  Identification of human liver cytochrome P-450 3A4 as the enzyme responsible for fentanyl and sufentanil N-dealkylation.

Authors:  T Tateishi; Y Krivoruk; Y F Ueng; A J Wood; F P Guengerich; M Wood
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Absolute and relative bioavailability of fentanyl buccal tablet and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.

Authors:  Mona Darwish; Mary Kirby; Philmore Robertson; William Tracewell; John G Jiang
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  Oxymorphone extended release does not affect CYP2C9 or CYP3A4 metabolic pathways.

Authors:  Michael Adams; Henry J Pieniaszek; Arnold R Gammaitoni; Harry Ahdieh
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.126

7.  Pharmacokinetic properties of fentanyl effervescent buccal tablets: a phase I, open-label, crossover study of single-dose 100, 200, 400, and 800 microg in healthy adult volunteers.

Authors:  Mona Darwish; Mary Kirby; Philmore Robertson; William Tracewell; John G Jiang
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Relative bioavailability of the fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet (FEBT) 1,080 pg versus oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate 1,600 pg and dose proportionality of FEBT 270 to 1,300 microg: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, three-period study in healthy adult volunteers.

Authors:  Mona Darwish; Kenneth Tempero; Mary Kirby; Jeffrey Thompson
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 9.  Effect of buccal dwell time on the pharmacokinetic profile of fentanyl buccal tablet.

Authors:  M Darwish; M Kirby; J G Jiang
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.889

10.  Fentanyl buccal tablet for relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer-related chronic pain.

Authors:  Neal E Slatkin; Fang Xie; John Messina; Thalia J Segal
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug
View more
  1 in total

1.  Rapid acting fentanyl formulations in breakthrough pain in cancer. Drug selection by means of the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis.

Authors:  Robert Janknegt; Marieke van den Beuken; Sjouke Schiere; Michael Überall; Roger Knaggs; Jaquie Hanley; Morten Thronaes
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-01-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.