Literature DB >> 19915067

Prenatal care utilization in excess of recommended levels: trends from 1985 to 2004.

Diane S Lauderdale1, Tyler J Vanderweele, Juned Siddique, John D Lantos.   

Abstract

Indexes of prenatal care adequacy distinguish care that includes more than the recommended number of visits because extra visits may signal a high-risk pregnancy. Using Natality files from 1985 to 2004, the authors found such "superadequate" care increased from 19.5% of pregnancies in 1985 to 30.0% in 2004. Although there were dramatic changes in the demographics of childbearing over the same 20 years, those changes do not explain the increase in extra prenatal visits: Superadequate care increased within every stratum defined by maternal birthplace, race, age, education, gravidity, marital status, and multiple birth. Had the demographics of childbearing not changed since 1985, the superadequate rate would be just as high in 2004. Although randomized controlled trials have found that reduced visit schedules for low-risk women do not lead to worse maternal or perinatal outcomes, the cost-effectiveness of more intense visit schedules is not known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19915067     DOI: 10.1177/1077558709351530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  8 in total

1.  Examining the spatially non-stationary associations between the second demographic transition and infant mortality: A Poisson GWR approach.

Authors:  Tse-Chuan Yang; Carla Shoff; Stephen A Matthews
Journal:  Spat Demogr       Date:  2013

2.  Trends in self-reported spontaneous abortions: 1970-2000.

Authors:  Kevin Lang; Ana Nuevo-Chiquero
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-08

3.  African American and Latino patient versus provider perceptions of determinants of prenatal care initiation.

Authors:  Allan A Johnson; Barbara D Wesley; M Nabil El-Khorazaty; Julie M Utter; Brinda Bhaskar; Barbara J Hatcher; Renee Milligan; Barbara K Wingrove; Leslie Richards; Margaret F Rodan; Haziel A Laryea
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-12

4.  What has geography got to do with it? Using GWR to explore place-specific associations with prenatal care utilization.

Authors:  Carla Shoff; Tse-Chuan Yang; Stephen A Matthews
Journal:  GeoJournal       Date:  2012-06-01

5.  Health status and health insurance coverage of women with live-born infants: an opportunity for preventive services after pregnancy.

Authors:  Denise V D'Angelo; Letitia Williams; Leslie Harrison; Indu B Ahluwalia
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-12

6.  Medically induced preterm birth and the associations between prenatal care and infant mortality.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Diane S Lauderdale; John D Lantos
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Prenatal care in combination with maternal educational level has a synergetic effect on the risk of neonatal low birth weight: new findings in a retrospective cohort study in Kunshan City, China.

Authors:  Lin-Lin Dai; Yuan-Yuan Mao; Xiao-Ming Luo; Yue-Ping Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The utilization of antenatal care among rural-to-urban migrant women in Shanghai: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Qi Zhao; Zhihuan Jennifer Huang; Sijia Yang; Jie Pan; Brian Smith; Biao Xu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.