Literature DB >> 19913897

Vitrification and warming of in vivo-derived porcine embryos in a chemically defined medium.

J Sanchez-Osorio1, C Cuello, M A Gil, I Parrilla, C Maside, C Almiñana, X Lucas, J Roca, J M Vazquez, E A Martinez.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to design a protocol for vitrification and warming of porcine embryos in a chemically defined medium. A total of 663 morulae and blastocysts were collected from weaned crossbred sows (Large White-Landrace) 5 to 6 d after estrus and vitrified with the Superfine Open Pulled Straw method. In Experiment 1, embryos were vitrified using as a basic medium TCM-199-HEPES supplemented with 20% newborn calf serum (NBCS) or with 0, 0.1%, 0.5%, or 1% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Nonvitrified embryos were used as a fresh control group. Survival and hatching rates were evaluated after 72 h of in vitro culture to assess embryo viability. In addition, some hatched blastocysts derived from morulae and blastocysts were processed to determine the total cell number and the cell proliferating index as measures of their quality. Within each stage of embryo development, the different vitrification groups and the fresh control group showed similar high embryo survival (range, 70.5+/-7.1% to 84.9+/-8.1% and 85.3+/-8.1% to 98.4+/-8.2% for morulae and blastocysts, respectively) and hatching rate (range, 46.3+/-10.1% to 66.7+/-11.2% and 73.7+/-11.3% to 89.4+/-11.2% for morulae and blastocysts, respectively) and quality after in vitro culture. In Experiment 2, embryos were vitrified using 0.1% PVA and warmed with TCM-199-HEPES-0.13 M sucrose supplemented with 20% NBCS or either 0 or 0.1% PVA. Nonvitrified embryos were used as a fresh control group. As in Experiment 1, no significant differences were detected in embryo survival (range, 67.9+/-6.6% to 74.5+/-6.6% and 91.9+/-7.0% to 99.5+/-6.3% for morulae and blastocysts, respectively) and hatching rate (range, 47.0+/-7.2% to 64.8+/-9.9% and 89.4+/-7.4% to 98.2+/-6.9% for morulae and blastocysts, respectively) and quality among the warming groups or among vitrified and fresh control embryos. In both experiments, the developmental embryo stage influenced the survival and hatching rates, as well as the number of cells (P<0.01), with the blastocyst stage yielding the best results. In conclusion, PVA can be used as a substitute for serum in vitrification and warming solutions without detrimental effects on the in vitro development of in vivo-derived porcine morulae and blastocysts. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19913897     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  9 in total

1.  Vitrification of Rattus norvegicus immature cumulus-oocyte complexes using hyaluronic acid.

Authors:  L M G Paim; L L Gal; R F F Lopes; A T D Oliveira
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Perinatal outcomes for transfer of blastocysts vitrified and warmed in defined solutions with recombinant human albumin: 374 babies born after 898 embryo transfers.

Authors:  Masao Murakami; Akiyoshi Egashira; Keiko Tanaka; Chizuru Mine; Hitomi Otsubo; Takeshi Kuramoto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Nonsurgical deep uterine transfer of vitrified, in vivo-derived, porcine embryos is as effective as the default surgical approach.

Authors:  Emilio A Martinez; Cristina A Martinez; Alicia Nohalez; Jonatan Sanchez-Osorio; Juan M Vazquez; Jordi Roca; Inmaculada Parrilla; Maria A Gil; Cristina Cuello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Successful production of piglets derived from expanded blastocysts vitrified using a micro volume air cooling method without direct exposure to liquid nitrogen.

Authors:  Koji Misumi; Yuri Hirayama; Sachiko Egawa; Shoko Yamashita; Hiroyoshi Hoshi; Kei Imai
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  An efficiency comparison of different in vitro fertilization methods: IVF, ICSI, and PICSI for embryo development to the blastocyst stage from vitrified porcine immature oocytes.

Authors:  Fahiel Casillas; Miguel Betancourt; Cristina Cuello; Yvonne Ducolomb; Alma López; Lizbeth Juárez-Rojas; Socorro Retana-Márquez
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-08-13

6.  Unveiling how vitrification affects the porcine blastocyst: clues from a transcriptomic study.

Authors:  C Almiñana; F Dubuisson; S Bauersachs; E Royer; P Mermillod; E Blesbois; F Guignot
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-15

7.  The Open Cryotop System Is Effective for the Simultaneous Vitrification of a Large Number of Porcine Embryos at Different Developmental Stages.

Authors:  Alejandro Gonzalez-Plaza; Josep M Cambra; Inmaculada Parrilla; Maria A Gil; Emilio A Martinez; Cristina A Martinez; Cristina Cuello
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-22

Review 8.  Review of the Current Research on Fetal Bovine Serum and the Development of Cultured Meat.

Authors:  Da Young Lee; Seung Yun Lee; Seung Hyeon Yun; Jae Won Jeong; Jae Hyeon Kim; Hyun Woo Kim; Jung Seok Choi; Gap-Don Kim; Seon Tea Joo; Inho Choi; Sun Jin Hur
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2022-09-01

9.  Effective vitrification and warming of porcine embryos using a pH-stable, chemically defined medium.

Authors:  Cristina Cuello; Cristina A Martinez; Alicia Nohalez; Inmaculada Parrilla; Jordi Roca; Maria A Gil; Emilio A Martinez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.