Farzeen Firoozi1, Howard B Goldman. 1. Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. farzeenfiroozi@aol.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To present our initial experience with a pure transvaginal approach for the removal of mesh erosion involving the bladder secondary to placement of transvaginal mesh for management of pelvic organ prolapse using a prolapse kit. METHODS: Transvaginal excision of mesh erosion involving the bladder after mesh placement using a prolapse kit was performed in 2 patients. A U-shaped incision is made in the anterior vaginal wall forming a vaginal wall flap. Mesh is identified, divided in the midline, and then dissected from the bladder. The bladder is closed via a transvaginal approach in 3 layers. RESULTS: Removal of mesh erosion within the bladder was completed, with all operative steps performed transvaginally in 2 patients. No intraoperative complications occurred. Both patients were discharged with bilateral JJ stents and an 18F Foley catheter. Follow-up cystogram was normal in both patients. There were no major postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal removal of mesh erosion involving the bladder is technically feasible. Additional experience is needed to better define patient selection criteria and indications for transvaginal excision of mesh erosion involving pelvic structures. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: To present our initial experience with a pure transvaginal approach for the removal of mesh erosion involving the bladder secondary to placement of transvaginal mesh for management of pelvic organ prolapse using a prolapse kit. METHODS: Transvaginal excision of mesh erosion involving the bladder after mesh placement using a prolapse kit was performed in 2 patients. A U-shaped incision is made in the anterior vaginal wall forming a vaginal wall flap. Mesh is identified, divided in the midline, and then dissected from the bladder. The bladder is closed via a transvaginal approach in 3 layers. RESULTS: Removal of mesh erosion within the bladder was completed, with all operative steps performed transvaginally in 2 patients. No intraoperative complications occurred. Both patients were discharged with bilateral JJ stents and an 18F Foley catheter. Follow-up cystogram was normal in both patients. There were no major postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal removal of mesh erosion involving the bladder is technically feasible. Additional experience is needed to better define patient selection criteria and indications for transvaginal excision of mesh erosion involving pelvic structures. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.