Literature DB >> 19913731

Translating evidence-based decision making into practice: appraising and applying the evidence.

Syrene A Miller1, Jane L Forrest.   

Abstract

This is the second of 2 articles that focus on strategies to integrate an evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) approach into your practice. The previous article provided an overview of EBDM concepts and identified strategies for finding evidence to answer clinical questions, the first 2 steps in the evidence-based process. The next steps are to determine the credibility and usefulness of the evidence and to apply the evidence to patient care. The purpose of this article is to discuss those steps by reviewing the critical appraisal criteria used to assess the methodological quality of a study. A case scenario will be used to demonstrate how appraising the evidence helps to answer questions and how to translate the evidence into everyday practice. Characteristics of an evidence-based practice and educational tips are provided along with a glossary of terms related to appraising the literature. Together, the two articles can serve as a primer for integrating EDBM into your practice. Generally, the most frequently asked clinical questions are related to the effectiveness of a certain technique, medication, diagnostic test, treatment, material, or product. The type of scientific evidence may include systematic reviews and critically appraised topics; clinical practice guidelines and protocols; article reviews; pharmaceutical and drug interaction information; and individual studies addressing questions about therapy, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and harm/etiology. Once the most current evidence has been found, the next step in the EBDM process is to understand what you have and its relevance to your patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19913731     DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract        ISSN: 1532-3382            Impact factor:   5.267


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Potential Role of Dental Patient-Reported Outcomes (dPROs) in Evidence-Based Prosthodontics and Clinical Care: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Cláudio Rodrigues Leles; Jésio Rodrigues Silva; Thalita Fernandes Fleury Curado; Martin Schimmel; Gerald McKenna
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 2.  Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda.

Authors:  Andrew Goldstein; Eric Venker; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Application of the principles of evidence-based practice in decision making among senior management in Nova Scotia's addiction services agencies.

Authors:  Matthew Murphy; M Jayne MacCarthy; Lynda McAllister; Robert Gilbert
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2014-12-05

4.  Necrotizing fasciitis in three university hospitals in Korea: a change in causative microorganisms and risk factors of mortality during the last decade.

Authors:  Shi Nae Yu; Tae Hyong Kim; Eun Jung Lee; Eun-Joo Choo; Min Hyok Jeon; Yung Gyu Jung; Tae Jin Kim; In Ki Mun; Ji Sung Lee
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2013-12-27

5.  Effect of smear layer deproteinization on bonding of self-etch adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Khaldoan H Alshaikh; Hamdi H H Hamama; Salah H Mahmoud
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2018-03-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.