Literature DB >> 19913516

Investigating the interaction of McN-A-343 with the M2 muscarinic receptor using its nitrogen mustard derivative.

Hinako Suga1, Frederick J Ehlert.   

Abstract

We investigated whether the aziridinium ion formed from a nitrogen mustard derivative (4-[(2-bromoethyl)methyl-amino]-2-butynyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate; BR384) structurally related to McN-A-343 (4-(trimethyl-amino)-2-butynyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate) interacts allosterically or orthosterically with the M(2) muscarinic receptor. Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the human M(2) muscarinic receptor were incubated with the aziridinium ion of BR384 in combination with McN-A-343 or other known orthosteric and allosteric ligands for various incubation times. After removing unreacted ligands, we measured the binding of [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine to residual unalkylated receptors. Affinity constants, rate constants for alkylation, and cooperativity constants were estimated for the interacting ligands using a mathematical model. Receptor alkylation by BR384 was consistent with a two-step process. After rapidly equilibrating with the receptor (step one), the aziridinium ion-receptor complex became covalently linked with a first order rate constant of about 0.95min(-1) (step two). McN-A-343, acetylcholine and N-methylscopolamine competitively protected the M(2) receptor from irreversible alkylation by BR384. In contrast, the allosteric modulators, gallamine and WIN 51,708 (17-beta-hydroxy-17-alpha-ethynyl-5-alpha-androstano[3,2-beta]pyrimido[1,2-alpha]benzimidazole), allosterically inhibited or had no effect on, respectively, receptor alkylation by BR384. There was good agreement between affinity constants estimated from the kinetics of receptor alkylation and by displacement of [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine binding. Our results suggest that BR384 covalently binds to the orthosteric site of the M(2) receptor and that McN-A-343 binds reversibly at the same locus. Our method of analyzing allosteric interactions does not suffer from the limitations of more conventional approaches and can be adapted to detect allosteric interactions at receptors other than the muscarinic subtypes. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19913516      PMCID: PMC2815195          DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  25 in total

Review 1.  Structural mimicry in G protein-coupled receptors: implications of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin for structure-function analysis of rhodopsin-like receptors.

Authors:  J A Ballesteros; L Shi; J A Javitch
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 2.  Structure and activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  E C Hulme; Z L Lu; J W Saldanha; M S Bee
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.407

3.  Two-state models and the analysis of the allosteric effect of gallamine at the M2 muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  Frederick J Ehlert; Michael T Griffin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Evidence for a tandem two-site model of ligand binding to muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  J Jakubik; E E El-Fakahany; S Tucek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-06-23       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Analogs of WIN 62,577 define a second allosteric site on muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  S Lazareno; A Popham; N J M Birdsall
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  Selectivity of agonists for the active state of M1 to M4 muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Authors:  Katherine W Figueroa; Michael T Griffin; Frederick J Ehlert
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Use of acetylcholine mustard to study allosteric interactions at the M(2) muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  Hinako Suga; Katherine W Figueroa; Frederick J Ehlert
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Comparison of the pharmacological antagonism of M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors expressed in isolation and in combination.

Authors:  Michael T Griffin; Jake Ching-Hsuan Hsu; Darakhshanda Shehnaz; Frederick J Ehlert
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 5.858

9.  The inhibitory effect of gallamine on muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  A L Clark; F Mitchelson
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Structure-function studies of allosteric agonism at M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Lauren T May; Vimesh A Avlani; Christopher J Langmead; Hugh J Herdon; Martyn D Wood; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.436

View more
  3 in total

1.  Allosteric modulation of seven transmembrane spanning receptors: theory, practice, and opportunities for central nervous system drug discovery.

Authors:  Bruce J Melancon; Corey R Hopkins; Michael R Wood; Kyle A Emmitte; Colleen M Niswender; Arthur Christopoulos; P Jeffrey Conn; Craig W Lindsley
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Mutagenesis of nucleophilic residues near the orthosteric binding pocket of M1 and M2 muscarinic receptors: effect on the binding of nitrogen mustard analogs of acetylcholine and McN-A-343.

Authors:  Hinako Suga; Gregory W Sawyer; Frederick J Ehlert
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  Effects of asparagine mutagenesis of conserved aspartic acids in helix 2 (D2.50) and 3 (D3.32) of M1-M4 muscarinic receptors on the irreversible binding of nitrogen mustard analogs of acetylcholine and McN-A-343.

Authors:  Hinako Suga; Frederick J Ehlert
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.162

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.