Literature DB >> 19913376

Evaluation of on-site oral fluid screening using Drugwipe-5(+), RapidSTAT and Drug Test 5000 for the detection of drugs of abuse in drivers.

Sarah M R Wille1, Nele Samyn, Maria del Mar Ramírez-Fernández, Gert De Boeck.   

Abstract

Driving under the influence of drugs is a major problem worldwide. At the moment, several countries have adopted a 'per se' legislation to address this problem. One of the key elements in the enforcement process is the possibility of rapid on-site screening tests to take immediate administrative measures. In this study, the reliability of three oral fluid screening devices (Mavand RapidSTAT, Securetec Drugwipe-5(+), and Dräger DrugTest 5000) was assessed by comparing their on-site results with confirmatory GC-MS plasma analysis. Our results demonstrate that for amphetamine screening, the oral fluid on-site devices on the market today are certainly sensitive enough. RapidSTAT, Drugwipe-5(+), and DrugTest 5000 demonstrated respectively a sensitivity of 93%, 100% and 92% for amphetamine/MDMA. For cocaine screening, sensitivities of 75%, 78% and 67% were obtained for the RapidSTAT, Drugwipe-5(+), and DrugTest 5000 devices, respectively. The studied devices were able to detect about 70% of all cannabis users in a roadside setting. However, a newer version of the DrugTest 5000 test cassette demonstrated a sensitivity of 93%, indicating an increased detection of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol using 'new generation' oral fluid screening tests with lowered cut-offs. Due to these promising results police officers and judicial experts are keen to use oral fluid screening devices. They believe that their ease of use and diminished amount of false positive results in comparison with urine screening will lead to more roadside tests and more appropriate juridical measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19913376     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  12 in total

1.  Oral fluid with three modes of collection and plasma methamphetamine and amphetamine enantiomer concentrations after controlled intranasal l-methamphetamine administration.

Authors:  Matthew N Newmeyer; Marta Concheiro; Jose Luiz da Costa; Ronald Flegel; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.345

2.  Orally administered cannabidiol does not produce false-positive tests for Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol on the Securetec DrugWipe® 5S or Dräger DrugTest® 5000.

Authors:  Danielle McCartney; Richard C Kevin; Anastasia S Suraev; Christopher Irwin; Ronald R Grunstein; Camilla M Hoyos; Iain S McGregor
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  On-site test for cannabinoids in oral fluid.

Authors:  Nathalie A Desrosiers; Dayong Lee; David M Schwope; Garry Milman; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 4.  Current knowledge on cannabinoids in oral fluid.

Authors:  Dayong Lee; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 3.345

5.  Cannabinoids in oral fluid by on-site immunoassay and by GC-MS using two different oral fluid collection devices.

Authors:  Nathalie A Desrosiers; Garry Milman; Damodara R Mendu; Dayong Lee; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  Rapid detection and quantitation of drugs-of-abuse by wooden-tip electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tsz-Tsun Ng; Pui-Kin So; Bin Hu; Zhong-Ping Yao
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.157

7.  Detection of Δ9 THC in oral fluid following vaporized cannabis with varied cannabidiol (CBD) content: An evaluation of two point-of-collection testing devices.

Authors:  Thomas R Arkell; Richard C Kevin; Jordyn Stuart; Nicholas Lintzeris; Paul S Haber; Johannes G Ramaekers; Iain S McGregor
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.345

8.  Preliminary Evidence for Cannabis and Nicotine Urinary Metabolites as Predictors of Verbal Memory Performance and Learning Among Young Adults.

Authors:  Natasha E Wade; Rachel Baca; Kelly E Courtney; Connor J McCabe; M Alejandra Infante; Marilyn A Huestis; Joanna Jacobus
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  A placebo-controlled study to assess Standardized Field Sobriety Tests performance during alcohol and cannabis intoxication in heavy cannabis users and accuracy of point of collection testing devices for detecting THC in oral fluid.

Authors:  W M Bosker; E L Theunissen; S Conen; K P C Kuypers; W K Jeffery; H C Walls; G F Kauert; S W Toennes; M R Moeller; J G Ramaekers
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  A Study on the Reliability of an On-Site Oral Fluid Drug Test in a Recreational Context.

Authors:  Stefano Gentili; Renata Solimini; Roberta Tittarelli; Giulio Mannocchi; Francesco Paolo Busardò
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.