Literature DB >> 19913274

Comparative assessment of genotoxicity of mineral water packed in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and glass bottles.

Elisabetta Ceretti1, Claudia Zani, Ilaria Zerbini, Licia Guzzella, Mauro Scaglia, Vanda Berna, Francesco Donato, Silvano Monarca, Donatella Feretti.   

Abstract

The potential migration of genotoxic compounds into mineral water stored in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles was evaluated by an integrated chemical/biological approach using short-term toxicity/genotoxicity tests and chemical analysis. Six commercial brands of still and carbonated mineral water bottled in PET and in glass were stored at 40 degrees C for 10 days in a stove according to the standard EEC total migration test (82/711/EEC), or at room temperature in the dark. After treatment, the samples were analysed using gas-chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to detect volatile and non-volatile compounds, the Microtox test to evaluate potential toxicity of the samples, and three mutagenicity tests -Tradescantia and Allium cepa micronucleus tests and the Comet assay on human leukocytes - to detect their genotoxic activity. GC/MS analysis did not detect phthalates or acetaldehyde in the water samples. The Microtox test found no toxic effects. Mutagenicity tests detected genotoxic properties of some samples in both PET and glass bottles. Statistical analyses showed a positive association between mineral content and mutagenicity (micronuclei in A. cepa and DNA damage in human leukocytes). No clear effect of treatment and PET bottle was found. These results suggest the absence of toxic compounds migrating from PET regardless of time and conditions of storage. In conclusion, bottle material and stove treatment were not associated with the genotoxic properties of the water; the genotoxic effects detected in bottled water may be related to the characteristics of the water (minerals and CO(2) content). Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19913274     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  Calcite precipitates in Slovenian bottled waters.

Authors:  Tamara Ferjan Stanič; Miloš Miler; Mihael Brenčič; Mateja Gosar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The Effect of Storage Time, Temperature and Type of Packaging on the Release of Phthalate Esters into Packed
Acidic Liquids.

Authors:  Noushin Rastkari; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Masud Yunesian; Reza Ahmadkhaniha
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.918

3.  Is a Plastic or Glass Feeding Bottle Easier to Be Cleaned?

Authors:  Yi-Lang Chen; Wen-Hui Kuan
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  Phthalate Esters and Their Potential Risk in PET Bottled Water Stored under Common Conditions.

Authors:  Xiangqin Xu; Gang Zhou; Kun Lei; Gerald A LeBlanc; Lihui An
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Occurrence and removal characteristics of phthalate esters from bottled drinking water using silver modified roasted date pits.

Authors:  Fedae A Alhaddad; Mohammed Abu-Dieyeh; Dana Da'ana; Murad Helaleh; Mohammad A Al-Ghouti
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-03-20

Review 6.  Evaluation of the Suitability of Mammalian In Vitro Assays to Assess the Genotoxic Potential of Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pinter; Bernhard Rainer; Thomas Czerny; Elisabeth Riegel; Benoît Schilter; Maricel Marin-Kuan; Manfred Tacker
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-02-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.