Literature DB >> 19913226

An audit of failed non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds.

D L Clarke1, N L Allorto, S R Thomson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Selective non-operative management based on clinical assessment has been shown to be a generally safe approach in the management of penetrating stab wounds of the torso. However there will be a subset of patients who fail selective non-operative management. This audit focuses on the failures.
METHODS: The metropolitan surgical service in Pietermaritzburg covers 3 hospitals. At the weekly metropolitan morbidity and mortality meeting all trauma patients are reviewed. All cases of failed selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal stab wounds are discussed. Failed non-operative management is usually defined as any patient who ultimately requires surgical exploration. We do not subscribe to this as we feel as long as the need for surgical intervention is recognised within a short period of time (<12h) there is little additional morbidity. Recognition of the need for surgical intervention after 12h would be regarded by us as failed non-operative management as we feel the risk of delay associated morbidity begins to increase significantly after this time.
RESULTS: A total of 340 patients with a penetrating anterior abdominal stab wound were managed over the 2 year period under review. A total of 192 (56%) of these patients were subjected to mandatory laparotomy. Of these mandatory laparotomies 98% were positive. The remaining 148 (44%) patients were observed. Of the 148 observed patients a total of 30 (20%) subsequently underwent surgery. A total of 13 patients were only taken to surgery after 12h of observation. In this group of 13 patients the average delay between admission and recognition of injury was 40 h. There were six gastric injuries, one pyloric and pancreatic injury, two gallbladder injuries, one liver, one colon and two small bowel injuries. There were no deaths. 9 patients recovered with no additional morbidity. In the remainder, morbidity included, relaparotomy (1), open abdomen (1), renal failure (1) and prolonged stay in ICU (3).
CONCLUSION: Clinical assessment accurately predicts the need for mandatory laparotomy following a stab wound to the torso. In patients who do not meet the indications for mandatory laparotomy and who are subjected to non-operative management 20% will come to surgery. A subgroup may only be recognised as requiring surgery after more than 12h. These patients are at risk of delay associated morbidity. There are particular anatomical sites and structures which are prone to error. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19913226     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  14 in total

1.  The management of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration: The results of a clinical trial.

Authors:  Metin Yücel; Adnan Özpek; Sema Yüksekdağ; İsmail Kabak; Fatih Başak; Ali Kılıç; Gürhan Baş; Orhan Alimoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 2.  Management guidelines for penetrating abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Walter L Biffl; Ari Leppaniemi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Selective non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds is a safe and cost effective strategy: A South African experience.

Authors:  Kss Dayananda; V Y Kong; J L Bruce; G V Oosthuizen; G L Laing; D L Clarke
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Predicting the Outcome of Non-operative Management of Splenic Trauma in South Africa.

Authors:  Matthew C Hernandez; Michael D Traynor; Ariel W Knight; Victor Y Kong; Grant L Laing; John L Bruce; Wanda Bekker; Martin D Zielinski; Damian L Clarke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The predictive value of physical examination in the decision of laparotomy in penetrating anterior abdominal stab injury.

Authors:  Metin Yucel; Gurhan Bas; Adnan Ozpek; Fatih Basak; Abdullah Sisik; Aylin Acar; Buket Altun Ozdemir; Sema Yuksekdag; Orhan Alimoglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

6.  Management of haemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal stab injuries: review of practice at an Australian major trauma centre.

Authors:  J Kevric; G M O'Reilly; R A Gocentas; O Hasip; C Pilgrim; B Mitra
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Selective non-operative management for penetrating abdominal injury in a Dutch trauma centre.

Authors:  Ojf Van Waes; Emm Van Lieshout; Dj Van Silfhout; J A Halm; Mme Wijffels; Mg Van Vledder; Hp De Graaff; Mhj Verhofstad
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Peritoneal Breach as an Indication for Exploratory Laparotomy in Penetrating Abdominal Stab Injury: Operative Findings in Haemodynamically Stable Patients.

Authors:  Jasmina Kevric; Victor Aguirre; Kate Martin; Dinesh Varma; Mark Fitzgerald; Charles Pilgrim
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.112

9.  Do patients with penetrating abdominal stab wounds require laparotomy?

Authors:  Behnam Sanei; Mohsen Mahmoudieh; Hamid Talebzadeh; Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri; Zahra Aghaei
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2013-06-01

10.  The demographics and outcome of patients with penetrating abdominal trauma admitted to emergency medicine department: A descriptive cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hojjat Derakhshanfar; Reza Azizkhani; Babak Masoumi; Azam Hashempour; Afshin Amini
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2013-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.