Literature DB >> 1991260

Patient-controlled analgesic administration. A comparison of steady-state morphine infusions with bolus doses.

H F Hill1, A M Mackie, B A Coda, K Iverson, C R Chapman.   

Abstract

The authors have shown previously that bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients who self-administered bolus doses of morphine gained equal oral mucositis pain relief while using less drug compared with similar patients receiving morphine by staff-controlled continuous infusion. In a follow-up study they compared the efficacy and side effects of morphine in two groups of marrow transplant patients who controlled their own analgesic administration either by conventional bolus-dose, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or by adjusting the rate of continuous morphine infusion to increase or decrease their plasma morphine concentration. Patients controlling their morphine infusion rates (pharmacokinetically based patient-controlled analgesia [PKPCA] group) obtained more relief from oral mucositis pain than did patients using conventional PCA. Patients in the PKPCA group used more morphine than PCA patients and achieved superior pain relief without significant increases in side effects (e.g., nausea, mood changes, sedation). The authors conclude that PKPCA improves the management of prolonged, severe pain in marrow transplant patients and that this approach to patient-controlled analgesia may be useful in other types of persistent pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1991260     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910215)67:4<873::aid-cncr2820670403>3.0.co;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

Review 1.  Target-controlled infusion systems: role in anaesthesia and analgesia.

Authors:  M C van den Nieuwenhuyzen; F H Engbers; J Vuyk; A G Burm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  Jan E Clarkson; Helen V Worthington; Susan Furness; Martin McCabe; Tasneem Khalid; Stefan Meyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

Review 3.  Systematic review of antimicrobials, mucosal coating agents, anesthetics, and analgesics for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Deborah P Saunders; Joel B Epstein; Sharon Elad; Justin Allemano; Paolo Bossi; Marianne D van de Wetering; Nikhil G Rao; Carin Potting; Karis K Cheng; Annette Freidank; Michael T Brennan; Joanne Bowen; Kristopher Dennis; Rajesh V Lalla
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Patient-controlled analgesia. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  H F Hill; L E Mather
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  [Pharmacotherapy of cancer pain : 2. Use of opioids.].

Authors:  N I Cherny; R K Portenoy; M Raber; M Zenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a pharmacokinetically-based patient-controlled analgesia system.

Authors:  H Hill; A Mackie; B Coda; R Schaffer; R Jacobson; C Benedetti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Overview of current development in patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  C Lindley
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.603

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.