INTRODUCTION: The area of the functional sinus node complex exceeds that of the anatomical sinus node; however, reasons for this discrepancy are unknown. We aimed to characterize the functional sinus node complex in health and disease with high-density simultaneous mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sinus node activity was characterized in 15 reference patients after ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. A further 16 patients were studied following ablation of chronic atrial flutter to determine effects of atrial remodeling. High-density simultaneous mapping of the sinus node complex was performed using a multi-electrode array. In reference patients, distance from superior vena cava-right atrial (SVC-RA) junction to earliest activation (EA) was 4 +/- 4 mm and sinus break-out (SBO) 9 +/- 6 mm. Preferential pathways of conduction were observed between EA and SBO. For patients with flutter, these distances were greater (EA: 15 +/- 12 mm, P = 0.003; SBO: 23 +/- 11 mm, P < 0.001). Conduction time along preferential pathways was 15 +/- 5 ms for reference patients and 23 +/- 8 ms for patients with flutter (P = 0.005). Following pacing, distance from SVC-RA junction to EA and SBO lengthened to 13 +/- 8 mm (P = 0.006) and 16 +/- 10 mm (P = 0.02), respectively, in reference patients, and 19 +/- 12 mm (P = 0.045), 28 +/- 9 mm (P = 0.02) in patients with flutter. This resulted in caudal shifts in EA and SBO of 10 +/- 9 mm and 7 +/- 8 mm in reference patients but diminished shifts in patients with flutter; 4 +/- 7 mm and 4 +/- 6 mm. CONCLUSION: The functional sinus node complex demonstrates dynamic changes in activation. There are preferential pathways of conduction from sinus node to atrial myocardium. The remodeled atria demonstrate longer conduction times along preferential pathways and a restricted functional sinus node complex.
INTRODUCTION: The area of the functional sinus node complex exceeds that of the anatomical sinus node; however, reasons for this discrepancy are unknown. We aimed to characterize the functional sinus node complex in health and disease with high-density simultaneous mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sinus node activity was characterized in 15 reference patients after ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. A further 16 patients were studied following ablation of chronic atrial flutter to determine effects of atrial remodeling. High-density simultaneous mapping of the sinus node complex was performed using a multi-electrode array. In reference patients, distance from superior vena cava-right atrial (SVC-RA) junction to earliest activation (EA) was 4 +/- 4 mm and sinus break-out (SBO) 9 +/- 6 mm. Preferential pathways of conduction were observed between EA and SBO. For patients with flutter, these distances were greater (EA: 15 +/- 12 mm, P = 0.003; SBO: 23 +/- 11 mm, P < 0.001). Conduction time along preferential pathways was 15 +/- 5 ms for reference patients and 23 +/- 8 ms for patients with flutter (P = 0.005). Following pacing, distance from SVC-RA junction to EA and SBO lengthened to 13 +/- 8 mm (P = 0.006) and 16 +/- 10 mm (P = 0.02), respectively, in reference patients, and 19 +/- 12 mm (P = 0.045), 28 +/- 9 mm (P = 0.02) in patients with flutter. This resulted in caudal shifts in EA and SBO of 10 +/- 9 mm and 7 +/- 8 mm in reference patients but diminished shifts in patients with flutter; 4 +/- 7 mm and 4 +/- 6 mm. CONCLUSION: The functional sinus node complex demonstrates dynamic changes in activation. There are preferential pathways of conduction from sinus node to atrial myocardium. The remodeled atria demonstrate longer conduction times along preferential pathways and a restricted functional sinus node complex.
Authors: Ali J Khiabani; Jason W Greenberg; Vivek H Hansalia; Richard B Schuessler; Spencer J Melby; Ralph J Damiano Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Ning Li; Brian J Hansen; Thomas A Csepe; Jichao Zhao; Anthony J Ignozzi; Lidiya V Sul; Stanislav O Zakharkin; Anuradha Kalyanasundaram; Jonathan P Davis; Brandon J Biesiadecki; Ahmet Kilic; Paul M L Janssen; Peter J Mohler; Raul Weiss; John D Hummel; Vadim V Fedorov Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Thomas A Csepe; Jichao Zhao; Brian J Hansen; Ning Li; Lidiya V Sul; Praise Lim; Yufeng Wang; Orlando P Simonetti; Ahmet Kilic; Peter J Mohler; Paul M L Janssen; Vadim V Fedorov Journal: Prog Biophys Mol Biol Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Thomas A Csepe; Jichao Zhao; Lidiya V Sul; Yufeng Wang; Brian J Hansen; Ning Li; Anthony J Ignozzi; Anna Bratasz; Kimerly A Powell; Ahmet Kilic; Peter J Mohler; Paul M L Janssen; John D Hummel; Orlando P Simonetti; Vadim V Fedorov Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: G Garret; D G Laţcu; S S Bun; B Enache; K Hasni; A Moustfa; N Saoudi Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Elisabeth M J P Mouws; Eva A H Lanters; Christophe P Teuwen; Lisette J M E van der Does; Charles Kik; Paul Knops; Ameeta Yaksh; Jos A Bekkers; Ad J J C Bogers; Natasja M S de Groot Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: M Choudhury; N Black; A Alghamdi; A D'Souza; R Wang; J Yanni; H Dobrzynski; P A Kingston; H Zhang; M R Boyett; G M Morris Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-10-13 Impact factor: 5.182