Literature DB >> 19912281

Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three African countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania.

Jérôme Ateudjieu1, John Williams, Marie Hirtle, Cédric Baume, Joyce Ikingura, Alassane Niaré, Dominique Sprumont.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As actors with the key responsibility for the protection of human research participants, Research Ethics Committees (RECs) need to be competent and well-resourced in order to fulfil their roles. Despite recent programs designed to strengthen RECs in Africa, much more needs to be accomplished before these committees can function optimally.
OBJECTIVE: To assess training needs for biomedical research ethics evaluation among targeted countries.
METHODS: Members of RECs operating in three targeted African countries were surveyed between August and November 2007. Before implementing the survey, ethical approvals were obtained from RECs in Switzerland, Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire in English and in French.
RESULTS: A total of 74 respondents participated in the study. The participation rate was 68%. Seventy one percent of respondents reported having received some training in research ethics evaluation. This training was given by national institutions (31%) and international institutions (69%). Researchers and REC members were ranked as the top target audiences to be trained. Of 32 topics, the top five training priorities were: basic ethical principles, coverage of applicable laws and regulations, how to conduct ethics review, evaluating informed consent processes and the role of the REC.
CONCLUSION: Although the majority of REC members in the targeted African countries had received training in ethics, they expressed a need for additional training. The results of this survey have been used to design a training program in research ethics evaluation that meets this need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19912281     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00266.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev World Bioeth        ISSN: 1471-8731            Impact factor:   2.294


  8 in total

1.  Reflections on running training workshops for research ethics committee members in Spain between 2001 and 2008.

Authors:  Josep-E Baños; M Isabel Lucena; Elisabet Serés; Fèlix Bosch
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  A Rare Opportunity: Examining the Experience of a New Institutional Review Board.

Authors:  Linda Parreco; Lisa Rooney; Sharon Hampp; Amanda Brown; Lori Minasian
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Consensus standards for introductory e-learning courses in human participants research ethics.

Authors:  John R Williams; Dominique Sprumont; Marie Hirtle; Clement Adebamowo; Paul Braunschweiger; Susan Bull; Christian Burri; Marek Czarkowski; Chien Te Fan; Caroline Franck; Eugenjius Gefenas; Antoine Geissbuhler; Ingrid Klingmann; Bocar Kouyaté; Jean-Pierre Kraehenbhul; Mariana Kruger; Keymanthri Moodley; Francine Ntoumi; Thomas Nyirenda; Alexander Pym; Henry Silverman; Sara Tenorio
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Are students kidding with health research ethics? The case of HIV/AIDS research in Cameroon.

Authors:  Nchangwi Syntia Munung; Godfrey B Tangwa; Chi Primus Che; Laurent Vidal; Odile Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 5.  Clinical trials have gone global: is this a good thing?

Authors:  Trudie Lang; Sisira Siribaddana
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  Strengthening stakeholder engagement through ethics review in biomedical HIV prevention trials: opportunities and complexities.

Authors:  Catherine Slack; Abigail Wilkinson; Jessica Salzwedel; Paul Ndebele
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.396

7.  The features and qualities of online training modules in research ethics: a case study evaluating their institutional application for the University of Botswana.

Authors:  Dolly Mogomotsi Ntseane; Joseph Ali; Kristina Hallez; Boikanyo Mokgweetsi; Mary Kasule; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Glob Bioeth       Date:  2019-03-26

8.  A Scoping Review of Empirical Research Relating to Quality and Effectiveness of Research Ethics Review.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Tavis P Hayes; Jamie C Brehaut; Michael McDonald; Charles Weijer; Raphael Saginur; Dean Fergusson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.