Literature DB >> 19912212

Changes in alkaline phosphatase levels in patients with prostate cancer receiving degarelix or leuprolide: results from a 12-month, comparative, phase III study.

Fritz H Schröder1, Bertrand Tombal, Kurt Miller, Laurent Boccon-Gibod, Neal D Shore, E David Crawford, Judd Moul, Tine Kold Olesen, Bo-Eric Persson.   

Abstract

Study Type - Therapy (RCT) Level of Evidence 1b OBJECTIVE To compare the activity of degarelix, a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) blocker, with leuprolide depot 7.5 mg in the control of total serum alkaline phosphatase (S-ALP) levels in patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the randomized, phase III trial (CS21), patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages), were randomized to one of three regimens: degarelix subcutaneous 240 mg for 1 month followed by monthly maintenance doses of 80 mg or 160 mg, or intramuscular leuprolide 7.5 mg/month. Patients receiving leuprolide could also receive antiandrogens for flare protection. We report exploratory S-ALP analyses from CS21, focusing on the comparison of degarelix 240/80 mg with leuprolide 7.5 mg, in line with the recent approvals of this dose by the USA Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. RESULTS Overall, 610 patients were included, with a median age of 73 years and median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 19.0 ng/mL. Baseline S-ALP levels were high in metastatic patients and highest in patients with metastatic disease and a haemoglobin level of <13 g/dL. In metastatic disease, after initial peaks in both groups, S-ALP levels were suppressed below baseline with degarelix but were maintained around baseline with leuprolide. The late rise in S-ALP seen with leuprolide was not apparent with degarelix. The pattern of S-ALP response was similar in patients with a baseline PSA level of > or =50 ng/mL. Between-treatment differences in patients with metastatic disease and those with a PSA level of > or =50 ng/mL were significant at day 364 (P = 0.014 and 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSION Patients with metastatic disease or those with PSA levels of > or =50 ng/mL at baseline had greater reductions in S-ALP levels with degarelix than with leuprolide. Patients in the degarelix group maintained S-ALP suppression throughout the study, in contrast to those in the leuprolide group. This suggests that degarelix might offer better S-ALP control than leuprolide and might prolong control of skeletal metastases, compared with GnRH agonists, over a 1-year treatment period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19912212     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08981.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  28 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: making the switch from LHRH antagonist to LHRH agonist.

Authors:  Judd W Moul
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Prostate cancer: Degarelix controls serum alkaline phosphatase better than leuprolide.

Authors:  Nick Warde
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Degarelix: a review of its use in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Natalie J Carter; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Re: 'Use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: indications and prevalence' by Connolly et al.

Authors:  Bo-Eric Persson
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  [Docetaxel or abiraterone in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer].

Authors:  P Hammerer; L Manka
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Degarelix versus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy N Clinton; Solomon L Woldu; Ganesh V Raj
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 7.  Non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a call for improved guidance on clinical management.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Thierry Roumeguère; Martin Spahn; Dirk Beyersdorff; Peter Hammerer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  An update on the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurent Boccon-Gibod; Egbert van der Meulen; Bo-Eric Persson
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-06

9.  Efficacy of degarelix in prostate cancer patients following failure on luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist treatment: results from an open-label, multicentre, uncontrolled, phase II trial (CS27).

Authors:  Kurt Miller; Gabriele Simson; Sandra Goble; Bo-Eric Persson
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-06

10.  Experience with degarelix in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Neal D Shore
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.