Literature DB >> 19912085

Treatment disparities and effect on late mortality in patients with diabetes presenting with acute myocardial infarction: observations from the ACACIA registry.

Joseph Hung1, David B Brieger, John V Amerena, Steven G Coverdale, James M Rankin, Carolyn M Astley, Ashish Soman, Derek P Chew.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of evidence-based pharmacological and invasive treatments and 12-month mortality rates between patients with and without diabetes who present with acute myocardial infarction (MI), and to explore the relationship between these treatments and late clinical outcomes. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective, nationwide multicentre registry: the Acute Coronary Syndrome Prospective Audit (ACACIA). PATIENTS: Patients presenting to 24 metropolitan and 15 non-metropolitan hospitals with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and a final discharge diagnosis of acute MI between November 2005 and July 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause mortality at 12 months.
RESULTS: Nearly a quarter of 1744 patients with a final diagnosis of acute MI had a history of diabetes on presentation. Patients with diabetes were older, with a greater prevalence of comorbidities than non-diabetic patients, and were less likely to be treated at discharge with evidence-based medications (aspirin, clopidogrel, a statin and/or a beta-blocker) or to receive early invasive procedures. After adjusting for baseline characteristics and therapeutic interventions, diabetes at presentation was independently associated with a higher mortality at 12 months after MI (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.18-2.72; P=0.007). Early invasive management and discharge prescription of guideline-recommended medications were associated with a significantly reduced hazard of mortality at 12 months.
CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes have a higher risk than non-diabetic patients of late mortality following an acute MI, yet receive fewer guideline-recommended medications and early invasive procedures. Increased application of proven pharmacotherapies and an early invasive management strategy in patients with diabetes presenting with ACS might improve their outcomes. STUDY PROTOCOL NUMBER (SANOFI-AVENTIS): PML-0051.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19912085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  4 in total

1.  Is there an additional benefit from coronary revascularization in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes or stable angina who are already on optimal medical treatment?

Authors:  Vasilios G Athyros; Thomas D Gossios; Konstantinos Tziomalos; Matilda Florentin; Asterios Karagiannis; Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.318

2.  Statin initiation and treatment non-adherence following a first acute myocardial infarction in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease versus the general population.

Authors:  Megan Bohensky; Mark Tacey; Caroline Brand; Vijaya Sundararajan; Ian Wicks; Sharon Van Doornum
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.156

3.  Impact of patient's health-related quality of life on physicians' therapy and perceived benefit in acute coronary syndromes: protocol for a systemic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

Authors:  Billingsley Kaambwa; Hailay Gesesew; Matthew Horsfall; Derek P Chew
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Trends from 1996 to 2007 in incidence and mortality outcomes of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction: a population-based study of 20,812 patients with first acute myocardial infarction in Western Australia.

Authors:  Joseph Hung; Tiew-Hwa Katherine Teng; Judith Finn; Matthew Knuiman; Thomas Briffa; Simon Stewart; Frank M Sanfilippo; Steven Ridout; Michael Hobbs
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.