Literature DB >> 19911181

Lumbar spine spondylolysis in the adult population: using computed tomography to evaluate the possibility of adult onset lumbar spondylosis as a cause of back pain.

Benjamin K Brooks1, Samuel L Southam, Gary W Mlady, Jeremy Logan, Matthew Rosett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if new onset of low back pain in adults could be secondary to lumbar spondylolysis by establishing the age-related prevalence in the general population by examining patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) for reasons unrelated to back pain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 2,555 patients who had undergone abdominal and pelvic CT in 2008 were reviewed electronically. In order to determine a true representation of the general population, we reviewed all indications for CT, excluding patients with a primary complaint of low back pain as the primary indication for imaging. Equal numbers of patients were separated into age groups by decade to ensure an even distribution of ages for statistical analysis. Patients older than 70 years were grouped together to provide case numbers comparable to those of the other decades. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the significance of the results. Three board-certified radiologists, including two musculoskeletal fellows and a radiology resident, retrospectively evaluated CT scans for lumbar spondylolysis, including unilateral and bilateral defects.
RESULTS: Of the 2,555 cases evaluated, there were 203 positive cases of defects of the lumbar pars interarticularis. This corresponded to an overall prevalence of 8.0%. Prevalence per decade was fairly evenly distributed and ranged from 7.0%( ages 30-39 years) to 9.2% (ages 70 years and above). Prevalence of ages 20-49 years was 7.9%, and that of ages 50 years and older was 8.0%. Male to female ratio was 1.5:1. Logistic regression showed no significant increase in spondylolysis based on age.
CONCLUSION: No significant increase in the prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was demonstrated in patients older than 20 years. This suggests that the development of symptomatic lumbar pars defects do not occur in this population and should not be considered as a rare but potentially treatable cause of new onset low back pain in adults. This study demonstrated an overall prevalence of pars defects of 8.0% in our population. As demonstrated in previous studies, the male to female ratio of 1.5:1 was a statistically significant difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19911181     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-009-0825-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  9 in total

Review 1.  Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in the athlete.

Authors:  David A Lundin; Diana B Wiseman; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents.

Authors:  R N Hensinger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Relationship between radiographic abnormalities of lumbar spine and incidence of low back pain in high school rugby players: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Iwamoto; H Abe; Y Tsukimura; K Wakano
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Computed tomography evaluation of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Lily M Belfi; A Orlando Ortiz; Douglas S Katz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  The radiological investigation of lumbar spondylolysis.

Authors:  C J Harvey; J L Richenberg; A Saifuddin; R L Wolman
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Diagnosis and evaluation of spondylolisthesis and/or spondylolysis on axial CT.

Authors:  J G Teplick; P A Laffey; A Berman; M E Haskin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  B E Fredrickson; D Baker; W J McHolick; H A Yuan; J P Lubicky
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Lumbar spondylolysis: a life long dynamic condition? A cross sectional survey of 4.151 adults.

Authors:  Stig Sonne-Holm; Steffen Jacobsen; H C Rovsing; Henrik Monrad; Peter Gebuhr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; David H Kim; Ling Li; Ali Guermazi; Valery Berkin; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

  9 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: various imaging features and natural courses.

Authors:  Tetsuo Nakayama; Shigeru Ehara
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Lumbar spondylolysis: a review.

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Alessandro Cianfoni; Alfonso Cerase; Nicola Magarelli; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Spondylolysis and spina bifida occulta in pediatric patients: prevalence study using computed tomography as a screening method.

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Jorge Cuellar; Tomas Zamora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Spondylolysis.

Authors:  Nathan Li; Sam Amarasinghe; Kyle Boudreaux; Waddih Fakhre; William Sherman; Alan Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-30

5.  Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a risk factor for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a case-control study.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Feng Wang; Yan-Long Gao; Jia-Qi Li; Jing-Tao Zhang; De-Chao Miao; Yong Shen
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Utility of Physical Examination Findings for Predicting Low-Back Pain in Adolescent Patients with Early-Stage Spondylolysis: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shiro Sugiura; Yasuchika Aoki; Takeshi Toyooka; Tetsuo Shiga; Takato Oyama; Tohru Ishizaki; Yasutaka Omori; Yasumi Kiguchi; Akito Takata; Tetsuya Otsuki; Ayako Kote; Yukio Matsushita; Yuzuru Okamoto; Seiji Ohtori; Satoru Nishikawa
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-10

7.  Facture of the Pars Interarticularis with or without Spondylolisthesis in an Adult Population in a Developing Country: Evaluation by Multidetector Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Sohail Ahmed Khan; Amjad Sattar; Usman Khanzada; Hatem Adel; Syed Omair Adil; Munawar Hussain
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15

8.  Sacropelvic Parameters and L5 Spondylolysis: Computed Tomography Analysis.

Authors:  Joseph Frederick Baker
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-03-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.