Literature DB >> 19910856

Outcomes and patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction with bilateral pedicled TRAM flaps in 105 consecutive patients.

Yoon S Chun1, Indranil Sinha, Arthur Turko, Stuart Lipsitz, Julian J Pribaz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction using pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps has come under increasing scrutiny secondary to presumed abdominal wall morbidity. This study analyzes morbidity and patient satisfaction in a consecutive series of breast reconstructions performed using bilateral pedicled TRAM flaps.
METHODS: Between 1991 and 2007, 105 women underwent bilateral pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction performed by the senior author (J.J.P.). Charts were reviewed for postoperative complications and demographic data. Minimum 11-month follow-up survey data were obtained through the Michigan Breast Satisfaction Questionnaire, the Qualitative Assessment of Back Pain Questionnaire, and the Short Form-36 questionnaire.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up interval was 6 years. Abdominal wall complications included three abdominal hernias (2.9 percent), three abdominal wall bulges (2.9 percent), and four partial donor-site skin dehiscences (3.8 percent). Fat necrosis was the most common flap complication, present in 24 flaps (11.4 percent). The survey response rate was 61.9 percent. Short Form-36 data demonstrated no significant difference from a mean age-matched female population in general well-being, although patients with a body mass index greater than or equal to 30 reported significantly lower emotional well-being (p = 0.01), social functioning (p = 0.03), and overall energy scores (p = 0.03) in comparison with patients with a body mass index less than 30. Thirteen of the 65 patients who completed the survey (20 percent) complained of postoperative back pain, although most of these patients reported their symptoms to be mild in nature.
CONCLUSIONS: Low complication rates were demonstrated and patients were generally satisfied in this series of 105 consecutive bilateral pedicled TRAM flaps. This suggests that the bilateral pedicled TRAM flap remains a viable option for breast reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19910856     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  Update 2010 of the German AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer - Chapter A: Surgery, Pathology and Prognostic Factors, Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy, Adjuvant Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssena; Nadia Harbeckb
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Mastectomy With and Without Immediate Reconstruction Using Private Insurer Claims Data.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox; Julie A Margenthaler; Kelly E Ball; Daniel Mines; Anna E Wallace; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  The versatility of the pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in oncologic patients.

Authors:  Adrien Daigeler; Maria Simidjiiska-Belyaeva; Daniel Drücke; Ole Goertz; Tobias Hirsch; Christian Soimaru; Marcus Lehnhardt; Hans-Ulrich Steinau
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Late Surgical-Site Infection in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Indranil Sinha; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins; Jennifer B Hamill; Xiaoxue Chen; Hyungjin M Kim; Gretchen Guldbrandsen; Yoon S Chun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.

Authors:  Jessica Erdmann-Sager; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Gretchen E Guldbrandsen; Yoon S Chun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Clinical application of a silk fibroin protein biologic scaffold for abdominal wall fascial reinforcement.

Authors:  Mark W Clemens; Susan Downey; Frank Agullo; Max R Lehfeldt; Gabriel M Kind; Humberto Palladino; Deirdre Marshall; Mark L Jewell; Anshu B Mathur; Bradley P Bengtson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-12-05

7.  Considering the Optimal Timing of Breast Reconstruction With Abdominal Flaps With Adjuvant Irradiation in 370 Consecutive Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap and Free Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Performed in a Chinese Oncology Center: Is There a Significant Difference Between Immediate and Delayed?

Authors:  Shanshan He; Jian Yin; Geoffrey L Robb; Jingyan Sun; Xuehui Zhang; Haixin Li; Jing Liu; Chunyong Han
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Technique for Minimizing Donor-site Morbidity after Pedicled TRAM-Flap Breast Reconstruction: Outcomes by a Single Surgeon's Experience.

Authors:  Mario Rietjens; Francesca De Lorenzi; Manconi Andrea; Jean-Yves Petit; Prakasit Chirappapha; Alaa Hamza; Stefano Martella; Benedetta Barbieri; Alessandra Gottardi; Lomeo Giuseppe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-03

9.  Unilateral and Bilateral Breast Reconstruction with Pedicled TRAM Flaps: An Outcomes Analysis of 188 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Jordan E Ireton; Jon A Kluft; Jeffrey A Ascherman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2013-06-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.