Literature DB >> 19910823

Comparison of resistance and concurrent resistance and endurance training regimes in the development of strength.

Brandon S Shaw1, Ina Shaw, Gregory A Brown.   

Abstract

Resistance and endurance training are often performed concurrently in most exercise programs and in rehabilitative settings in an attempt to acquire gains in more than 1 physiologic system. However, it has been proposed that by simultaneously performing these 2 modes of exercise training, the strength gains achieved by resistance training alone may be impaired. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the effects of 16 weeks of resistance training and concurrent resistance and endurance training on muscular strength development in 38 sedentary, apparently healthy males (25 yr +/- 8 mo). Subjects were age-matched and randomly assigned to either a control (Con) group (n = 12), resistance training (Res) group (n = 13), or concurrent resistance and endurance training (Com) group (n = 13). After 16 weeks, no changes were found in the strength of the subjects in the Con group. Resistance training and concurrent resistance and endurance training significantly (p < or = 0.05) improved strength in all of the 8 prescribed exercises. The data also indicated that 16 weeks of concurrent resistance training and endurance training was as effective in eliciting improvements in strength as resistance training alone in previously sedentary males. As such, concurrent resistance and endurance training does not impede muscular strength gains and can be prescribed simultaneously for the development of strength in sedentary, apparently healthy males and thus may invoke all the physiologic adaptations of resistance and endurance training at once.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19910823     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bc191e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization: block periodization: new horizon or a false dawn?

Authors:  John Kiely
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The Effect of Two Different Concurrent Training Programs on Strength and Power Gains in Highly-Trained Individuals.

Authors:  Henrik Petré; Pontus Löfving; Niklas Psilander
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Establishing a proof of concept for the effects of low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet (LCHFD) and physical activity on body composition in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Gerrit J Breukelman; Albertus K Basson; Trayana G Djarova; Brandon S Shaw; Cornelia J du Preez; Ina Shaw
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-02-16

4.  Efficacy of a whole-body vibration intervention to effect exercise tolerance and functional performance of the lower limbs of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Trentham Furness; Nicole Bate; Liam Welsh; Geraldine Naughton; Christian Lorenzen
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.317

5.  Strength training and detraining in different populations: case studies.

Authors:  Mário C Marques; Adam Zajac; Ana Pereira; Aldo M Costa
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Satellite cell response to concurrent resistance exercise and high-intensity interval training in sedentary, overweight/obese, middle-aged individuals.

Authors:  Jamie K Pugh; Steve H Faulkner; Mark C Turner; Myra A Nimmo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Adaptations to strength training differ between endurance-trained and untrained women.

Authors:  Olav Vikmoen; Truls Raastad; Stian Ellefsen; Bent R Rønnestad
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.078

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.