Literature DB >> 19910816

Kinematic analysis of the powerlifting style squat and the conventional deadlift during competition: is there a cross-over effect between lifts?

Michael E Hales1, Benjamin F Johnson, Jeff T Johnson.   

Abstract

Many individuals involved in the sport of powerlifting believe that the squat and deadlift have such similar lifting characteristics that the lifts yield comparable training results. The aim of this study was to compare and contrast biomechanical parameters between the conventional style deadlift and the back squat performed by 25 lifters competing in regional powerlifting championship. The 3-dimensional analysis incorporated 4 60 Hz synchronized video cameras for collecting data from 25 participants. Parameters were quantified at the sticking point specific to each lift. Kinematic variables were calculated at the hip, knee, and ankle. Paired (samples) t-tests were used to detect significant differences in the kinematic mean scores for the different lift types. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences exist between the squat (0.09 m/s) and the deadlift (0.20 m/s) vertical bar velocities. Differences were found for angular position of the hip, knee, and ankle between lifts. The sticking point thigh angles were quantified as 32.54 +/- 3.02 and 57.42 +/- 4.57 for the squat and deadlift, respectively. Trunk angles were 40.58 +/- 6.29 (squat) and 58.30 +/- 7.15 (deadlift). The results indicate the back squat represents a synergistic or simultaneous movement, whereas the deadlift demonstrates a sequential or segmented movement. The kinematic analysis of the squat and the conventional deadlift indicate that the individual lifts are markedly different (p < 0.01), implying that no direct or specific cross-over effect exists between the individual lifts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19910816     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bc1d2a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  12 in total

1.  Optimal effort investment for overcoming the weakest point: new insights from a computational model of neuromuscular adaptation.

Authors:  Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Barbell Hip Thrust, Muscular Activation and Performance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Walter Krause Neto; Thais Lima Vieira; Eliane Florencio Gama
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Relationships Between Anthropometry and Maximal Strength in Male Classic Powerlifters.

Authors:  Pierre-Marc Ferland; Antoine Laurier; Alain Steve Comtois
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 4.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Adding the Load Just Above Sticking Point Using Elastic Bands Optimizes Squat Performance, Perceived Effort Rate, and Cardiovascular Responses.

Authors:  Javier Gene-Morales; Andrés Gené-Sampedro; Rosario Salvador; Juan C Colado
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  The existence of a sticking region in free weight squats.

Authors:  Roland van den Tillaar; Vidar Andersen; Atle Hole Saeterbakken
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 7.  Understanding and Overcoming the Sticking Point in Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Justin Kompf; Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  The Sticking Point in the Bench Press, the Squat, and the Deadlift: Similarities and Differences, and Their Significance for Research and Practice.

Authors:  Justin Kompf; Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men.

Authors:  Vidar Andersen; Marius S Fimland; Dag-Andrè Mo; Vegard M Iversen; Tommy M Larsen; Fredrik Solheim; Atle H Saeterbakken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Long-Term Strength Adaptation: A 15-Year Analysis of Powerlifting Athletes.

Authors:  Christopher Latella; Wei-Peng Teo; Jemima Spathis; Daniel van den Hoek
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.415

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.